Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation: The Experience of the University of Bologna and the Case of Preoperative Positive Cross-Match

Peripheral phenotype and gene expression profiles of combined liver-kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The beneficial effect of one graft on another has been reported in combined transplantation but the associated mechanisms and biological influence of each graft have not yet been established.

METHODS

In multiple analyses, we explored the PBMC phenotype and signature of 45 immune-related messenger RNAs and 754 microRNAs from a total of 235 patients, including combined liver-kidney transplant recipients (CLK), patients with a liver (L-STA) or kidney (K-STA) graft only under classical immunosuppression and patients with tolerated liver (L-TOL) or kidney grafts (K-TOL).

RESULTS

CLK show an intermediary phenotype with a higher percentage of peripheral CD19(+) CD24(+) CD38(Low) memory B cells and Helios(+) Treg cells, two features associated with tolerance profiles, compared to L-STA and K-STA (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Very few miRNA were significantly differentially expressed in CLK vs. K-STA and even fewer when compared to L-STA (35 and 8, P < 0.05). Finally, CLK are predicted to share common miRNA targets with K-TOL and even more with L-TOL (344 and 411, P = 0.005). Altogether CLK display an intermediary phenotype and gene profile, which is closer to that of liver transplant patients, with possible similarities with the profiles of tolerant patients.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that CLK patients show the immunological influence of both allografts with liver having a greater influence.

The role of B cells in solid organ transplantation

The role of antibodies in chronic injury to organ transplants has been suggested for many years, but recently emphasized by new data. We have observed that when immunosuppressive potency decreases either by intentional weaning of maintenance agents or due to homeostatic repopulation after immune cell depletion, the threshold of B cell activation may be lowered. In human transplant recipients the result may be donor-specific antibody, C4d+ injury, and chronic rejection. This scenario has precise parallels in a rhesus monkey renal allograft model in which T cells are depleted with CD3 immunotoxin, or in a CD52-T cell transgenic mouse model using alemtuzumab to deplete T cells. Such animal models may be useful for the testing of therapeutic strategies to prevent DSA. We agree with others who suggest that weaning of immunosuppression may place transplant recipients at risk of chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and that strategies to prevent this scenario are needed if we are to improve long-term graft and patient outcomes in transplantation. We believe that animal models will play a crucial role in defining the pathophysiology of antibody-mediated rejection and in developing effective therapies to prevent graft injury. Two such animal models are described herein.

Donor-directed MHC class I antibody is preferentially cleared from sensitized recipients of combined liver/kidney transplants

For patients with chronic renal and liver diseases, simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) is the best therapeutic option. The role of a pretransplant donor-specific antibody (DSA) in SLKT is unclear. We report the results of a retrospective review from 7/08 to 10/09 of SLKT at our institution. Monitoring of DSA was performed using single antigen bead assay. Between 7/08 and 10/09, there were six SLKT who had preformed DSA and positive XM (four class I and II DSA, one class I DSA only, one class II only). One-year patient and renal graft survival was 83%. Death-censored liver allograft survival was 100%. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) of the kidney occurred in 66% (three with both class I and II DSA and one with only class II DSA) of patients. In those with AHR, class I antibodies were rapidly cleared (p < 0.01) while class II antibodies persisted (p = 0.25). All patients who had humoral rejection of their kidney had preformed anticlass II antibodies. Liver allografts may not be fully protective of the renal allograft, especially with pre-existing MHC class II DSA. Long-term and careful follow-up will be critical to determine the impact of DSA on both allografts.

A single center experience of combined liver kidney transplantation

With advancements in the operative techniques, patient survival following liver transplantation (LTx) has increased substantially. This has led to the acceleration of pre-existing kidney disease because of immunosuppressive nephrotoxicity making additional kidney transplantation (KTx) inevitable. On the other hand, in a growing number of patients on the waiting list to receive liver, long waiting time has resulted in adverse effect of decompensated liver on the kidney function. During the last two decades, the transplant community has considered combined liver kidney transplantation (CLKTx) to overcome this problem. The aim of our study is to present an overview of our experience as well as a review of the literature in CLKTx and to discuss the controversy in this regard. All performed CLKTx (n = 22) at our institution as well as all available reported case series focusing on CLKTx are extracted. The references of the manuscripts were cross-checked to implement further articles into the review. The analyzed parameters include demographic data, indication for LTx and KTx, duration on the waiting list, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, immunosuppressive regimen, post-transplant complications, graft and patient survival, and cause of death. From 1988 to 2009, a total of 22 CLKTx were performed at our institution. The median age of the patients at the time of CLKTx was 44.8 (range: 4.5-58.3 yr). The indications for LTx were liver cirrhosis, hyperoxaluria type 1, polycystic liver disease, primary or secondary sclerosing cholangitis, malignant hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, cystinosis, and congenital biliary fibrosis. The KTx indications were end-stage renal disease of various causes, hyperoxaluria type 1, polycystic kidney disease, and cystinosis. The mean follow-up duration for CLKTx patients were 4.6 +/- 3.5 yr (range: 0.5-12 yr). Overall, the most important encountered complications were sepsis (n = 8), liver failure leading to retransplantation (n = 4), liver rejection (n = 3), and kidney rejection (n = 1). The overall patient survival rate was 80%. Review of the literature showed that from 1984 to 2008, 3536 CLKTx cases were reported. The main indications for CLKTx were oxalosis of both organs, liver cirrhosis and chronic renal failure, polycystic liver and kidney disease, and liver cirrhosis along with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). The most common encountered complications following CLKTx were infection, bleeding, biliary complications, retransplantation of the liver, acute hepatic artery thrombosis, and retransplantation of the kidney. From the available data regarding the need for post-operative dialysis (n = 673), a total of 175 recipients (26%) required hemodialysis. During the follow-up period, 154 episodes of liver rejection (4.3%) and 113 episodes of kidney rejection (3.2%) occurred. The cumulative 1, 2, 3, and 5 yr survival of both organs were 78.2%, 74.4%, 62.4%, and 60.9%, respectively. Additionally, the cumulative 1, 2, 3, and 5 yr patient survival were 84.9%, 52.8%, 45.4%, and 42.6%, respectively. The total number of reported deaths was 181 of 2808 cases (6.4%), from them the cause of death in 99 (55%) cases was sepsis. It can be concluded that there is still no definitive evidence of better graft and patient survival in CLKTx recipients when compared with LTx alone because of the complexity of the exact definition of irreversible kidney function in LTx candidates. Additionally, CLKTx is better to be performed earlier than isolated LTx and KTx leading to the avoidance of deterioration of clinical status, high rate of graft loss, and mortality. Shorter graft ischemia time and more effective immunosuppressive regimens can reduce the incidence of graft malfunctioning in CLKTx patients. Providing a model to reliably determine the need for CLKTx seems necessary. Such a model can be shaped based upon new and precise markers of renal function, and modification of MELD system.

Acute humoral rejection in an ABO compatible combined liver-kidney transplant--the kidney is not always protected

Combined liver-kidney transplantation has become a common practice for the treatment of patients with concurrent end-stage renal disease and end-stage liver disease. Liver transplantation in the setting of multiorgan transplantation is thought to have a protective effect against humoral rejection even when a positive crossmatch is obtained prior to surgery. In most centers, a pre liver-kidney transplant crossmatch is rarely performed because of the known immunoprotective effect of the liver allograft. In this report, a case of acute humoral rejection in the kidney allograft after a combined liver-kidney transplant is described. Although humoral rejection was treated using plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab, the kidney required 3 months to recover function and finally progressed to chronic allograft nephropathy. A heightened index of suspicion for acute humoral rejection of the renal allograft is necessary when performing combined liver-kidney transplants to highly sensitized patients due to previous organ transplants.

Kidney transplantation combined with other organs in Bologna: an update

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively reviewed our experience in combined liver-kidney (L-KT) and heart-kidney (H-KT) transplantations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1997 and April 2007, we performed 25 L-KT and 5 H-KT. Patient mean age was 51+/-8 years in L-KT and 43+/-11 years in H-KT. The main cause of liver failure was chronic viral hepatitis (14 cases). Etiology of heart failure was dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (4 and 1 patients, respectively). The main causes of renal failure in L-KT were chronic glomerulonephritis (n=8) and polycystic disease (n=7). Etiology of renal failure in H-KT was interstitial nephropathy (n=2), vascular nephropathy (n=2), and chronic glomerulonephritis (n=1).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 32+/-26 months in L-KT and 24+/-17 months in H-KT. Immunosuppression was cyclosporine-based (n=4) or tacrolimus-based (n=21) in L-KT and cyclosporine-based in H-KT. Acute rejection rate was 8% for both liver and kidney in L-KT; 80% (mild) for heart and 40% for kidney in H-KT. In the L-KT group, there was no primary graft nonfunction (PGNF). Two patients experienced liver delayed graft function (DGF); 1 patient required postoperative dialysis. One-year graft and patient survivals were both 84% and overall graft and patient survival was 76%. In the H-KT group, 3 patients needed postoperative dialysis and 1 required a cardiac assistance device for 48 hours; overall graft and patient survival was 100% with good cardiac and renal functions.

CONCLUSION

Our experience confirmed that H-KT and L-KT are safe procedures, offering good long-term results.

[Renal graft outcome in patients with associated liver transplant]

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 50% of liver transplant recipients have some degree of renal failure; patients in haemodialysis treatment have a higher risk of suffering hepatic diseases related to viral infections or concomitant pathologies. Improvement in surgical and organ preservation techniques and immunosuppressive therapy has permitted multiorganic transplants in patients needing both liver and kidney organs.

OBJECTIVES

To review our results in renal transplants in those patients with liver and kidney transplants.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Retrospective study of the 15 patients with liver and kidney transplants performed in our Hospital. We have reviewed patients main characteristics, liver and renal failure causes, renal graft and patient outcome and complications relate to renal transplant.

RESULTS

Between 1975 and December 2006 we performed 1483 kidney transplants and between 1991 and December 2006, 409 liver transplants. We performed multiorganic liver and kidney transplants to 15 patients (4 women and 11 men). The average for liver transplant recipients was 52.5+/-9.3 years (range 37-61) and for kidney transplant recipients was 51+/-12.5 years (35-66). Cold ischemia was 6.4+/-5.4 hours (6-8) in simultaneous liver-kidney transplant and 20.5+/-5.4 (8-27 hours) in non-simultaneous ones. Three patients had a renal transplant before the liver one (two functioning which had no changes after hepatic transplant but the other was lost due to IgA glomeruloneprhitis relapse and received a simultaneous kidney-liver transplant). Six patients received a simultaneous kidney-liver transplant and eight patients a renal transplant between 16 and 83 months (x=50.5+/-25.9 months) after the liver transplant. A renal graft was lost due to renal vein thrombosis and two due to IgA relapse; the others were functioning between 6 and 264 months of follow-up (x=92.5+/-66.7) with creatinine levels of 1.86+/-mg/100, (range 1-4.5). Four patients died due to hepatic failure between 8 months and 21 years after renal transplant and another died of oesophagus cancer 14 years after the kidney transplant, in all cases with functioning renal graft. There were no cases of kidney graft acute rejection in simultaneous transplants but there were five in non-simultaneous ones. Immunotherapy was based on steroids and tacrolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver-kidney transplants are worthy options in patients with hepatic and renal end failure. Acute rejection seems to have fewer incidences in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation.

Combined liver and kidney transplantation: analysis of Padova experience

BACKGROUND/AIM

The main indications for combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) are as follows: (1) cirrhosis with renal damage dependent or not upon liver disease, (2) renal failure with dialysis and concomitant liver end-stage disease, (3) congenital diseases, and (4) enzymatic liver deficiency with concomitant renal failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate our results with CLKT both in adult and pediatric patients.

METHODS

From September 1995 to September 2006, 15 CLKT (2.8%) among 541 liver transplantations included 4 pediatric patients (27%). The main indications for CLKT were hepatitis C virus (HCV) and polycystic diseases in adult patients, and primary hyperoxaluria in pediatric patients.

RESULTS

The double transplantation was performed from the same donor in all cases. All adult patients received whole liver grafts, whereas 3 split transplants and 1 whole liver graft were transplanted in the pediatric patients. Median liver and kidney cold ischemia times were 468 and 675 minutes, respectively. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 1-125), the overall survival rate was 80%. Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 100% for adult CLKT, whereas they were 50% for pediatric patients. We observed only 2 cases (18%) of delayed renal function, requiring temporary hemodialysis with progressive graft improvement. There was only 1 case of kidney retransplantation due to early graft nonfunction in a pediatric patient.

CONCLUSION

Although CLKT is related to major surgical risks, results after transplantation are satisfactory with an evident immunological advantage.