No induction versus anti-IL2R induction therapy in simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation: a comparative analysis

A Single-center Experience on the Value of Pancreas Graft Biopsies and HLA Antibody Monitoring After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

In simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT), monitoring of the pancreas allograft is more complex than the kidney allograft due to difficulties in obtaining pancreas histology and weak clinical evidence supporting the role of donor-specific antibodies (DSA).

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of all 17 SPKT recipients who underwent a total of 22 pancreas allograft indication biopsies from October 2009 to September 2012. Fifteen patients had at least 2 DSA measurements: pretransplantation and at the time of biopsy.

RESULTS

All 7 patients (100%) with post-transplantation DSA-positivity (de novo: n = 6; persistent: n = 1) at biopsy had at least 1 rejection episode either of the pancreas (n = 4) or the kidney (n = 3), with 3 antibody-mediated rejections (AMR). In contrast, only 4 of 8 patients (50%) without post-transplantation DSA had evidence of rejection, with 1 AMR. Findings during pancreas allograft biopsy procedures led to a change of immunosuppressive therapy in 11 of 15 (73%) patients. Patient survival, graft survival, and function were not adversely affected by the presence of post-transplantation DSA. One major and 2 minor procedure-related complications occurred during the pancreas biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small retrospective analysis, pancreas allograft histology provided the most therapeutically relevant information, rather than the kidney histology or DSA monitoring.

Immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation with an emphasis on antibody induction strategies: review and perspective

A review of recent literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with respect to immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation (PTX). In the past decade, the majority of PTXs were performed with depleting antibody induction, particularly in the setting of either calcineurin inhibitor minimization, corticosteroid withdrawal or both. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of predominantly tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolatemofetil, TAC/mycophenolic acid or TAC/sirolimus with or without corticosteroids. Depending on PTX category, donor and recipient risk factors, case mix and immunosuppressive regimen, the 1-year incidence of acute rejection has decreased to 5-20%. Current 1-year rates of immunological pancreas graft loss range between 1.8 and 6%. Depleting antibody induction and either TAC/mycophenolatemofetil or TAC/sirolimus maintenance therapy with early steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of immunosuppression in PTX. However, the development of non-nephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimens is highly desirable to improve quality of life in all solid organ transplant recipients.

Trends in immunosuppression after pancreas transplantation: what is in the pipeline?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of currently available immunosuppressive strategies and novel therapeutic developments in pancreas transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

From 1966 through 2012 more than 30 000 pancreas transplantations have been performed around the world with excellent patient and graft survival. However, drug-related side effects and toxicities remain to negatively affect long-term outcomes. At present, more than 90% of pancreas transplant recipients receive induction therapy with depleting or nondepleting antibodies. The most widely used maintenance protocols are based on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with early or delayed corticosteroid withdrawal. In case of documented side effects related to this standard protocol, several regimens are actively pursued to switch to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors as well as to attempt initial calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and immunosuppression minimization. In addition, the recent documented negative impact of donor-specific antibodies on pancreas transplantation outcome has resulted in new treatment protocols for antibody-mediated rejection including intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-CD20 antibodies and protease inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Implementation of novel therapeutic strategies and combination protocols to reduce or avoid drug toxicities and immune-related complications that are evaluated in prospective and randomized trials is requested to improve outcomes after pancreas transplantation.

Immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: progress to date

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal failure due to type 1 diabetes mellitus. With advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppression management, outcomes have improved, with current 1- and 10-year pancreas graft survival rates of 86% and 53%, respectively. Induction therapy with either alemtuzumab or rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus appears to be safe and effective in the setting of rapid steroid withdrawal (RSW), with excellent graft survival and low rejection rates. There are no large randomized trials between alemtuzumab and rATG to determine whether one is better than the other. Anti-interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antibody induction and no induction in combination with a CNI, MMF or sirolimus, and prednisone have demonstrated excellent graft survival rates but are associated with a higher incidence of acute rejection. The efficacy of anti-IL-2 receptor antibodies or no induction in the setting of RSW is unproven. Both of the CNIs, ciclosporin and tacrolimus, are effective in preventing acute rejection in SPKT recipients; however, pancreas allograft survival may be better with tacrolimus. MMF is more effective than azathioprine in preventing acute rejection. Sirolimus appears to be effective in preventing acute rejection, but the combination of sirolimus with a CNI may accentuate the nephrotoxicity of the CNI. RSW with induction therapy is safe and effective in SPKT recipients, but longer follow-up data on outcomes are needed. Recent analysis of registry data shows that most transplant centres are using an induction agent followed by a combination of tacrolimus, MMF and corticosteroids in SPKT recipients.

Advances in immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A review of current literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with regard to clinical immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Through 2006, over 20 000 pancreas transplantations were performed in the US. Since 2000, the 1-year patient survival rates for the three pancreas transplantation categories--simultaneous pancreas-kidney, sequential pancreas after kidney, and pancreas alone--were 95-97% and the 1-year pancreas graft survival (complete insulin independence) rates were 85%, 78%, and 77%, respectively. One-year rates of rejection have steadily decreased and are currently in the 10-20% range depending on case mix and immunosuppressive regimen. At present, 88% of recipients receive antibody induction, 65% receive maintenance therapy with the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil combination, and 40-50% undergo corticosteroid withdrawal without adverse consequences. Limited data with tacrolimus/sirolimus reveal excellent short-term outcomes, whereas initial attempts with calcineurin inhibitor avoidance or minimization are less promising.

SUMMARY

Antibody induction and either tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus/sirolimus maintenance therapy with steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of contemporary immunosuppression in clinical pancreas transplantation. The development of a nonnephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimen, however, is highly desirable to improve outcomes and quality of life in recipients.

Daclizumab

Daclizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody which binds to the IL-2 receptor on activated lymphocytes and blocks the production of IL-2. Its use is well established in solid organ transplantation as induction therapy, especially in high-risk patients where reduction or delayed dose of standard immunosuppression would be beneficial. It has been used effectively in both 2-dose and 5-dose regimens in conjunction with other standard immunosuppressive agents. The incidence of acute rejection appears reduced without increasing the rates of infection or post-transplant lympho-proliferative disorders. The agent is generally well tolerated in adults and children and there is no need for additional monitoring. Daclizumab has also been used outside the transplant arena in a variety of immune-mediated diseases with limited success.