Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: Influence of Immunosuppressive Regimens on Viral Load and Liver Histology

Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection post liver transplantation: impact of choice of calcineurin inhibitor

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection following liver transplantation (LT) for hepatitis C is universal. After LT, hepatitis C is associated with accelerated fibrosis progression and reduced graft and patient survival. Furthermore, responses to antiviral therapy in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus post-transplant are consistently sub-optimal. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) like cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus continue to dominate immunosuppressive regimens in this population; however, there is still uncertainty as to whether either offers an advantage in terms of patient outcomes. Although tacrolimus demonstrates improved efficacy in the general LT population, differences have begun to emerge between these agents regarding diabetogenic potential, antiviral activity, and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C. This review critically evaluates the existing literature, providing an overview of the reported differences, concluding that despite conflicting evidence, a potential benefit of CsA in patients with hepatitis C is supported by the data and warrants further investigation. Future studies examining the role of CNIs in hepatitis C virus-positive LT recipients are required to accurately examine the effects of CNIs on outcomes such as fibrosis progression, survival, and effects on response to antiviral therapy, to provide robust information that allows clinicians to make an informed choice concerning which CNI is best for their patients.

The adverse pharmacology of calcineurin inhibitors and their impact on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation: implications for clinical practice

Calcineurin inhibitors are widely used as maintenance immunosuppressants in solid-organ transplantation to minimize the risk of allograft rejection. Although the use of these agents has transformed the outcomes for patient and graft survival, this has come at a cost, notably the well-known adverse events of nephrotoxicity and metabolic abnormalities, to name a few. Over the last decade, tremendous interest has also focused on the impact of these medications on the replication of hepatitis C virus (HCV), with cyclosporine in particular having a negative effect on viral replication in vitro. Although small retrospective studies suggested that there may be a beneficial effect with cyclosporine on the progression of recurrent HCV and response to interferon, these findings have not been validated in several well-designed randomized controlled trial studies. The authors will review the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of these well-known drugs and discuss the impact of these medications on the natural history of HCV recurrence after liver transplantation.

Inflammatory bowel disease and hepatitis B and C

The risk of viral B and C hepatitis has long been considered to be increased in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Blood transfusion and surgery have been identified as the two main risk factors, suggesting nosocomial transmission could be involved. However, recent epidemiologic surveys have found that prevalence in IBD patients is similar to or even lower than that in the general population. Part of the explanation of these recent data may lie in the application of protective measures against viral infection (hepatitis B virus [HBV] vaccination and hepatitis C virus [HCV]-free blood transfusions). Sometimes fatal viral reactivations have been reported in patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Two periods can be distinguished: a) during therapy, a rise in viremia associated with a decrease of immune-mediated hepatic lesions; b) after cessation of therapy, an immune rebound with a destruction of virus-infected hepatocytes. For HBV, preemptive strategy consisting of an antiviral analog is efficient in chronic HBs antigen carriers. For HCV, the impact of immunosuppressive drugs on the natural history is unclear. Most studies report improved comfort although no biopsies were performed before and after immunosuppressive treatment. Physicians managing IBD patients should be aware of the need for screening and institute preventive measures against B and C hepatitis.

Cyclosporine and psoriasis: 2008 National Psoriasis Foundation Consensus Conference

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine is a valuable option for the treatment of psoriasis. This report summarizes studies regarding the use of cyclosporine since the last guidelines were published in 1998.

OBJECTIVE

A task force of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board was convened to evaluate treatment options. Our aim was to achieve a consensus on new updated guidelines for the use of cyclosporine in the treatment of psoriasis.

METHODS

Reports in the literature were reviewed regarding cyclosporine therapy.

LIMITATIONS

There are few evidence-based studies on the treatment of psoriasis with cyclosporine.

RESULTS

A consensus was achieved on the use of cyclosporine in psoriasis including specific recommendations on dosing, monitoring, and use of cyclosporine in special situations. The consensus received approval from members of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of psoriasis. It has a particularly useful role in managing psoriatic crises, treating psoriasis unresponsive to other modalities, bridging to other therapies, and treating psoriasis within a rotational scheme of other medications. Appropriate patient selection and monitoring will significantly decrease the risks of side effects.

Treatment of psoriasis in patients with hepatitis C: from the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation

BACKGROUND

Treating psoriasis in patients with concomitant hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection presents a special challenge. Not only is psoriasis exacerbated by interferon therapy, the standard of care for HCV, but many psoriasis therapies are potentially hepatotoxic, immunosuppressive, or both, which has been generally thought to be a contraindication in chronic infections such as HCV.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to arrive at a consensus on treating psoriasis in patients with concomitant HCV infection.

METHODS

Reports in the literature were reviewed regarding common psoriasis therapies and liver toxicity.

RESULTS

Topical therapies are first-line therapy for patients with limited psoriasis and HCV. Ultraviolet B phototherapy may be considered as a second-line treatment when needed. Ultraviolet B phototherapies in combination with topical therapies are first line for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, and are considered safe in those patients with concomitant HCV infection. Other systemic therapies, such as acitretin, etanercept, and, possibly, other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, are considered second line. Psoralen plus ultraviolet A should also be considered a second-line therapy.

LIMITATIONS

There are few evidence-based studies on treating psoriasis with systemic therapy in patients with pre-existing liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no large double-blind clinical trials addressing the treatment of psoriasis in patients with HCV infection and more studies are needed.

Efficacy of interferon Beta combined with cyclosporine induction and intensified therapy for retreatment of chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major burden after liver transplantation. There is no effective treatment for these patients, therefore management is challenging. Cyclophilins are essential host factors for HCV replication. We have reported herein the efficacy of divided administration of interferon (IFN) beta plus cyclosporine for chronic hepatitis C patients who failed pegylated (Peg)-IFN or IFN combined ribavirin treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 59 patients (median age, 63 years) with genotype 1b who failed to respond to the combinations of IFN plus ribavirin or Peg-IFN plus ribavirin. Our treatment involved induction, intensified, and maintenance therapies. The induction therapy prescribed intravenous 1 MU IFN beta every 4 hours for the first 3 days, 1.5 MU IFN beta every 6 hours for the next 4 days, and then 2 MU IFN beta every 8 hours for 3 weeks. The intensified therapy was the induction therapy shortened to 2 weeks. The maintenance therapy involved Peg-IFN alpha 2b and ribavirin. Cyclosporine was given 4 times daily during the induction and intensified therapies. Ribavirin was given twice daily during the maintenance phase.

RESULTS

The end treatment and sustained virological response rates in the present study were 73% (43/59) and 59% (35/59), respectively. The relapse rate was 19% (8/43). Sixteen percent of patients (3/19) were nonresponders. All adverse effects were reversible. The treatment protocol was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Our protocol should be effective for patients who have failed previous combination therapies.