Ten Years of Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Retrospect and Prospect From the Nephrologist’s Point of View

Single-port live donor nephrectomy using a novel Curved Radius r2 Surgical System in an in vivo model

OBJECTIVE

Single-port laparoscopic donor nephrectomy provides low morbidity and satisfactory cosmetic results for patients. The aim of this animal study was to establish a surgical technique of single-site (LESS) living donor nephrectomy using novel curved r2 CURVE manipulators specially designed for single-port access.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of six LESS nephrectomies were performed in three female pigs. r2 CURVE-instruments (Tuebingen Scientific Medical GmbH) were used providing a curved rotatable shaft, endless tip rotation, as well as 90° tip deflection. A 10 mm 30° extra long laparoscope, r2-curved Grasper, Maryland dissector and bipolar scissors were used for mobilization and dissection.

RESULTS

All LESS nephrectomies were performed successfully. Average operative time was 80 min (range, 42-149 min). No technical problems were observed. Insertion and extraction of the instruments through the single-port were easy to conduct. The diameter of the used single-port was sufficient for safe manual organ harvesting. Potential conflict between the laparoscope and the instrument handles was avoided by using an extra long laparoscope.

CONCLUSIONS

The new curved and deflectable instruments showed that single-port nephrectomy using the R2 manipulators is feasible. Single-port laparoscopic nephrectomy might be more patient-friendly and improve the willingness of potential donors to donate live organs.

Transperitoneal laparoscopic heminephrectomy in duplex kidney: our initial experience

OBJECTIVES

To study the feasibility, safety, and effect of transperitoneal laparoscopic heminephrectomy in the duplex kidney.

METHODS

From December 2003 to January 2008, 18 patients with urinary tract duplex anomalies underwent laparoscopic heminephrectomy using a transperitoneal approach. The sites of surgery consisted of 6 right upper, 2 right lower, 9 left upper, and 1 left lower heminephrectomy. Follow-up studies were performed using renal ultrasonography in all patients.

RESULTS

All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery successfully without conversion to open surgery or intraoperative complications. The mean operative time was 142.8 minutes (range 90-195). The mean estimated blood loss was 196.1 mL (range 20-600), and the mean hospital stay was 6.1 days (range 4-10). In 1 patient, a minor postoperative urine leak resolved spontaneously with prolonged catheter drainage. The radiologic assessment showed normal ipsilateral renal growth in 18 patients at a mean follow-up of 25.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial clinical experience suggests that laparoscopic heminephrectomy using a transperitoneal approach for the duplex kidney is feasible, safe, and effective. Therefore, the transperitoneal approach for moiety excision, which offers a technically simple approach for complete ureterectomy, is recommended.