Transarterial Chemoembolization Before Liver Transplantation in 60 Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A 2020 update on liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most frequent liver tumor and is associated with chronic liver disease in 90% of cases. In selected cases, liver transplantation represents an effective therapy with excellent overall survival.

AREA COVERED

Since the introduction of Milan criteria in 1996, numerous alternative selection systems to LT for HCC patients have been proposed. Debate remains about how best to select HCC patients for transplant and how to prioritize them on the waiting list.

EXPERT OPINION

The selection of the best scoring system to propose in the context of LT for HCC is far to be identified. In this review, we analyze and categorize the various selection systems, assessing their roles in the different decisional phases.

Re-evaluating transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Consensus recommendations and review by an International Expert Panel

Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) usually receive transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic therapies with intermediate and advanced-stage disease. However, intermediate-stage HCC patients often have unsatisfactory clinical outcomes with repeated TACE and there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the criteria for repeating or stopping TACE treatment. In July 2012, an Expert Panel Opinion on Interventions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (EPOIHCC) was re-convened in Shanghai in an attempt to provide a consensus on the practice of TACE, particularly in regard to evaluating TACE 'failure'. To that end, current clinical practice throughout Asia was reviewed in detail including safety and efficacy data on TACE alone as well as in combination with targeted systemic therapies for intermediate HCC. This review summarizes the evidence discussed at the meeting and provides expert recommendations regarding the use of TACE for unresectable intermediate-stage HCC. A key consensus of the Expert Panel was that the current definitions of TACE failure are not useful in differentiating between situations where TACE is no longer effective in controlling disease locally vs. systemically. By redefining these concepts, it may be possible to provide a clearer indication of when TACE should be repeated and more importantly, when TACE should be discontinued.

Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation - an emerging clinical challenge

In western countries, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major reason for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with estimated recurrence rates between 15% and 20%. This selective literature review addresses follow-up care after OLT in HCC and current treatment options. Recurrence prediction is based on pathological tumor stage, vascular invasion, serum alfafetoprotein levels, and histological differentiation, but further advances are expected by molecular profiling techniques. Lower levels of immunosuppressive agents are associated with a lower risk for HCC recurrence. Retrospective studies indicate that mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors as immunosuppression reduce the risk of HCC recurrence. However, prospective studies supporting this potential advantage of mTOR inhibitors are still lacking, and higher rejection rates were reported for sirolimus after OLT in HCC. Prognosis is poor in recurrent HCC, a longer interval between OLT and recurrence and feasibility of surgical resection are associated with improved survival. Systemic treatment with sorafenib is the current standard of care in patients with advanced-stage HCC not suitable for locoregional therapy. After OLT, combination of an mTOR inhibitor with sorafenib is feasible and frequently used in clinical practice. As safety and efficacy data are still limited, close clinical monitoring is mandatory.

Effectiveness of locoregional therapy before living donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who meet the Milan criteria

BACKGROUND

Many patients are diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria. In Korea, these patients are preferentially treated with locoregional therapy (LRT) instead of living donor liver transplantation. We investigated the effectiveness of LRT in liver transplant recipients who met the Milan criteria at the time of HCC diagnosis and investigated risk factors for HCC recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with HCC who met the Milan criteria between 2002 and 2008.

RESULTS

We performed 101 liver transplants for HCC during the study period. Seventy-one patients (70%) underwent pretransplant LRT. The disease-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in patients who received LRT were 96.6%, 93.1%, and 93.1%, and in those who did not receive LRT, 94.2%, 83.4%, and 83.4%, respectively. There were no differences between the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis showed that a low Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and microvascular invasion were independent predictors of HCC recurrence after transplantation. The MELD scores and rate of microvascular invasion were not statistically different in patients with or without previous LRT.

CONCLUSION

Pretransplant LRT for patients with HCC who met the Milan criteria at the time of diagnosis did not provide a clear benefit with respect to HCC recurrence after transplantation. If patients have suitable living donors, those who meet the Milan criteria should undergo a liver transplantation as soon as possible.

Current status of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing worldwide. A multi-disciplinary approach is required for its management. Screening high-risk patients allows for earlier diagnosis and the use of potentially curative therapies. Current recommendations for HCC screening for patients with cirrhosis are an abdominal ultrasound and serum alpha fetoprotein level every 6 to 12 months. Treatment choice depends on tumor stage, liver function and the patient's overall functional status. Curative therapies include surgical resection, liver transplantation (LT), transarterial chemoembolization, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Surgical resection, either primary resection or LT, is the treatment most likely to result in cure of HCC. Which option to pursue is based on multiple factors. LT has the potential benefit of treating both HCC and the underlying cirrhosis; however, long wait times incur the risk of tumor progression. Firm recommendations regarding the role of living donor LT for HCC are not yet possible because of conflicting data. HCC recurrence after LT is 8-11% and several adjuvant therapies have been investigated to reduce this. Bridging therapy and tumor downsizing are techniques that also may be considered to deal with long waiting periods and qualification for LT, respectively. If neither LT nor primary resection is possible, loco-regional therapies such as RFA and TACE should be considered. Systemic chemotherapies have proved disappointing for the treatment of HCC; however, newer targeted therapies such as sorafenib and cetuximab have provided new hope for the future.

Transarterial chemoembolisation: effect of selectivity on tolerance, tumour response and survival

AIMS

To compare selective and non-selective TACE techniques in the treatment of HCC with a special emphasis on clinical and liver tolerance, tumour response and survival.

METHODS

184 patients with advanced HCC were retrospectively included. Three different TACE techniques were compared: non selective lipiodol-chemotherapy + non selective embolisation (TACE-technique group 1), non selective lipiodol-chemotherapy + selective embolisation (group 2), and selective lipiodol-chemotherapy + selective embolisation (group 3).

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis TACE-technique group is an independently significant prognostic factor for poor clinical tolerance, poor liver tolerance and tumour response. The rate of patients with poor clinical tolerance was lower in group 3 (27.0%) than in groups 1 (64.1%, p < 10(-3)) or 2 (66.7%, p < 10(-3)). The rate of patients with poor liver tolerance was higher in group 2 (34.0%) than in groups 1 (17.6%, p = 0.050) or 3 (6.9%, p = 0.011). The rate of patients with tumour response was higher when embolisation was selective versus non-selective, i.e., group 2 + 3 (78.7%) versus group 1 (62.5%, p = 0.054). Overall survival was not significantly different between the three groups (p = 0.383).

CONCLUSION

Both selective techniques resulted in better tumour response. As for improving tolerance, our study suggests that the main technical factor is the use of selective lipiodol-chemotherapy injection.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma as a bridge to liver transplantation: a retrospective study

Background. Transcatheter arterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) can be used in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma to avoid tumor progression before transplantation. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE used as a bridge to liver transplantation. Methods. TACE was performed in 30 cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Milan criteria were used to select patients for transplant. Patients had a good or moderately impaired liver function, no arterioportal fistulae, and a good portal perfusion. Results. 48 TACE were performed in 30 patients. Before transplantation, 4 patients were dropped off the list due to tumor extension or liver failure. Complete necrosis of the tumor was observed in 11 patients and partial necrosis in 15 patients. After transplantation, 6 patients died and tumor recurrence was observed in 5 patients with a tumor beyond Milan criteria or no response to TACE. Conclusion. TACE is useful as a bridge to liver transplantation in a selected group of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. A combined therapeutic approach before surgery might improve the prognosis in these patients.

Chemoembolization decreases drop-off risk of hepatocellular carcinoma patients on the liver transplant list

INTRODUCTION

The drop-off risk for patients awaiting liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is 22%. Transplant liver availability is expected to worsen, resulting in longer waiting times and increased drop-off rates. Our aim was to determine whether chemoembolization can decrease this risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-seven consecutive HCC patients listed for liver transplant (Milan criteria) underwent statistical comparability adjustments using the propensity score (Wilcoxon, Fisher's, and chi-square tests). Forty-three nonchemoembolization patients and 22 chemoembolization patients were comparable for Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, tumor size and number, alpha fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and cause of cirrhosis. We calculated the risk of dropping off the transplant list by assigning a transplant time to those who dropped off (equal probability with patients who were on the list longer than the patient in question). The significance level was obtained by calculating the simulation distribution of the difference compared with the permutations of chemoembolization versus nonchemoembolization assignment of the patients. Kaplan-Meier estimators (log-rank test) were used to determine survival rates.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 187 ± 110 weeks (range 38 to 435, date of diagnosis). The chemoembolization group had an 80% drop-off risk decrease (15% nonchemoembolization versus 3% chemoembolization, p = 0.04). Although survival was better for the chemoembolization group, it did not reach statistical significance. Two-year survival for the nonchemoembolization and chemoembolization group was 57.3% ± 7.1% and 76.0% ± 7.9%, respectively (p = 0.078).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoembolization appears to result in a significant decrease in the risk of dropping off liver transplant list for patients with HCC and results in a tendency toward longer survival.

Chemoembolization follow-up of hepatocellular carcinoma with MR imaging: usefulness of evaluating enhancement features on one-month posttherapy MR imaging for predicting residual disease

PURPOSE

To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging performed 1 month after localized chemotherapy as a measure of tumor response, before detectable changes in size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This trial was approved by the authors' institutional review board and was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Inclusion criteria selected patients receiving chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with MR imaging within 2 months before treatment, in addition to MR imaging after treatment at 1 month and 6 months. Pathology was used as a surrogate for 6-month follow-up if the patient underwent interval transplantation. The final population consisted of 23 tumors (occurring within 21 patients). MR imaging studies were evaluated separately by two radiologists. Tumors were scored as showing complete loss of enhancement or as showing some residual tissue enhancement. Changes in T1 and T2 signal and perilesional enhancement were tabulated and recorded. Lesion size was also measured on all MR imaging studies by using a one-dimensional measure of the longest dimension. Increase in tumor size from 1-6 months of 20% or greater was used as confirmation of residual disease. In 5 of 23 tumors, review of pathology served as the surrogate standard. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were computed for each rater.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 1-month follow-up MR imaging were 71.4-85.7%, 100%, and 91.3-95.7%. There was a high degree of agreement between the two readers for both the 1-month (kappa = 0.88) and 6-month (kappa = 1.0) MR imaging studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation shows high accuracy for using tumor enhancement features on 1-month posttherapy MR imaging to predict residual disease after chemoembolization of HCC.

Beyond Milan criteria--chances and risks of expanding transplantation criteria for HCC patients with liver cirrhosis

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is, apart from resection, one important curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in liver cirrhosis, and especially attractive because it eliminates both the tumor and the underlying liver disease. The application of restrictive inclusion criteria for OLT in HCC patients resulted in favorable long-term recurrence-free survival. These criteria, however, exclude a subgroup of patients which, despite advanced tumor size, demonstrate an acceptable outcome. As a consequence, expansion of the strict Milan criteria has been discussed. However, this will also deteriorate the average outcome of OLT in HCC patients. Considering that we run short of donor organs, more sophisticated prediction models for survival after OLT for HCC patients are needed to identify patients who benefit best from OLT. Neoadjuvant treatment that is frequently applied as a bridging technique for patients on the waiting list for OLT could provide useful information on tumor behavior to better predict the risk of post-OLT tumor recurrence. This might also allow expansion of the Milan criteria to patients with good response to downstaging methods without negatively affecting post-OLT survival. Furthermore, alternative scoring systems have been suggested to identify HCC patients that might still benefit from resection instead of OLT, and molecular tools are being explored to provide predictive information on HCC biology. This review discusses the advantages and risks of extended inclusion criteria for OLT and the currently available data on alternative prediction models and bridging methods in HCC patients.

Bridging locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The impact of locoregional therapy prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma utilizing either transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), yttrium-90 ((90)Y), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or resection prior to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is largely unknown. We sought to examine locoregional therapies and their effect on survival compared with transplantation alone.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database.

RESULTS

123 patients were included. Patients were analyzed in two groups. Group I consisted of 50 patients that received therapy (20 TACE; 16 (90)Y; 13 RFA, 3 resections). Group II consisted of 73 patients transplanted without therapy. Median list time was 28 days (range 2-260 days ) in group I, and 24 days (range 1-380 days) in group II. Median time from therapy to OLT was 3.8 months (range 9 days to 68 months). Twelve patients (24%) were successfully downstaged (8 TACE, 2 (90)Y, 2 RFA/resection). Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival were 81%, 74%, and 74%, respectively. Survival was not statistically significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.53). The 12 patients downstaged did not have a significant difference in survival as compared with the patients who received therapy but did not respond or the patients who were transplanted without therapy (P = 0.76).

CONCLUSION

Our report addresses locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma as a bridge to transplant. There was no statistical difference in overall survival between patients treated and those not treated prior to transplant. We provide further evidence that locoregional therapy is a safe tool for patients on the transplant list, does not impact survival, and can downstage selected patients to allow life-saving liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation: an update 2008

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Expansion of the donor pool for liver transplantation is a priority. Management of hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma has focused on decreasing recurrence rates after transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Expansion of the pool of donors has focused on live donor liver transplantation and extended criteria donor grafts. The results of live donor liver transplantation are equivalent to those of deceased donor liver transplantation. The use of extended criteria donor grafts has increased significantly. The results are associated with decreased graft survival with the use of grafts that have multiple factors considered as extended criteria for transplantation, particularly in high-risk individuals such as critically ill recipients. Judicious matching of extended criteria donors with recipients is essential to reduce waiting list mortality without reducing posttransplantation survival. The role of pretransplant ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma is evolving to reduce tumor progression and dropout on the list as well as to influence posttransplant recurrence rates. Antiviral and immunosuppressive strategies in reducing the severity of hepatitis C virus recurrence are discussed as is retransplantation for the disease.

SUMMARY

Expansion of the donor pool with the use of extended criteria donors and live donor liver transplantation is a major challenge. Transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C virus relapse are major areas of research.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: latest developments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review primarily focuses on new developments in the field of hepatocellular carcinoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Potential preventive strategies in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma are being recognized. Novel molecular markers identified may aid in the diagnosis of early hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus. Prognostic information gained by preoperative tumor biopsy is being investigated. Treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma with resection versus primary or salvage transplantation continues to be debated. Expansion of selection criteria beyond the Milan criteria appears feasible. The role of living donor liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma will require further study to determine the risk of recurrence. Improvements in chemoembolization with drug eluting beads appear promising.

SUMMARY

Further insight into the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma will result in the continued evolution of our approach and management of the disease. Tailored therapies based on tumor biology are needed to improve treatment response and ultimately patient survival.

Correlation of multislice CT and histomorphology in HCC following TACE: predictors of outcome

The purpose of this study was to correlate histopathological with CT findings in patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) eligible for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), with a special focus on the antitumoral effect of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy. A total of 42 consecutive patients suffering from HCC had been treated prior to OLT by means of TACE. TACE was carried out with a mixture of Lipiodol (10-20 ml) and mitomycin C (max. dosage, 10 mg). TACE was performed at 6- to 8-week intervals. Follow-up investigation included contrast-enhanced multislice CT controls and laboratory control. Liver explants were evaluated macroscopically and microscopically to determine the number and size of the tumor lesions as well as the degree of tumor necrosis. Necrosis was investigated in H&E-stained sections. The degree of necrosis was classified as follows: 0-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, 75-99%, and complete necrosis. Two hundred thirty-one TACE procedures (5.5 +/- 2.9; range, 1-14) were performed. Mean tumor size in CT before and after TACE was 4.1 +/- 2.4 (range, 1.0-12.0 cm) and 2.7 +/- 1.2 (range, 1.0-6.0 cm; p < 0.001). Mean tumor number before and after TACE in CT was 2.5 +/- 1.5 (n = 105; range, 1-8) and 2.4 +/- 2.0 (n = 103; range, 1-6; p = 0.99). In the surgical specimen tumor size and tumor number were 2.8 +/- 1.6 (range, 1.0-7.0 cm; p = 0.78) and 1.9 +/- 1.2 (range, 1-7; p = 0.003). Mean tumor necrosis was 67.8% +/- 28.1%. Tumor necrosis was subtotal or complete in 17 of 42 (40.5%) patients. Tumor necrosis correlated significantly with the degree of arterial devascularization in CT (p = 0.001), the amount of Lipiodol washout (p = 0.002), and the number of tumor lesions (i.e., unifocal vs. multifocal). Furthermore, elevated serum levels of bilirubin (p = 0.005) and decreased albumin (p = 0.004) affected the local antitumoral effect. A poor necrosis rate (< 25%) significantly correlated with the number of TACE procedures accomplished (p = 0.023). In conclusion, TACE provided an acceptable local antitumoral effect in patients scheduled for liver transplantation. Tumor necrosis depended significantly on the degree of arterial devascularization and the accumulation of Lipiodol within the HCC lesions. Unifocal tumors and preserved liver function were positive predictors for a more favorable local antitumoral effect. Poor necrosis rates were found in patients with significant Lipiodol washout and who received a limited number of TACE procedures.