Cytomegalovirus Infections in Cardiac Transplant Patients: An Experience at a Clinical Hospital, University of Chile

Incidence and severity of cytomegalovirus infection in seropositive heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The frequency and significance of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in seropositive (R+) heart transplant recipients (HTR) is unclear, with preventative recommendations mostly extrapolated from other groups. We evaluated the incidence and severity of CMV infection in R+ HTR, to identify risk factors and describe outcomes.

METHODS

R+ HTR from 2010 to 2019 were included. Antiviral prophylaxis was not routinely used, with clinically guided monitoring the local standard of care. The primary outcome was CMV infection within one-year post-transplant; secondary outcomes included other herpesvirus infections and mortality.

RESULTS

CMV infection occurred in 27/155 (17%) R+ HTR. Patients with CMV had a longer hospitalization (27 vs. 20 days, unadjusted HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, p = .01), higher rate of intensive care readmission (26% vs. 9%, unadjusted HR 3.46, 1.46-8.20, p = .005), and increased mortality (33% vs. 8%, unadjusted HR 10.60, 4.52-24.88, p < .001). The association between CMV and death persisted after adjusting for multiple confounders (HR 24.19, 95% CI 7.47-78.30, p < .001). Valganciclovir prophylaxis was used in 35/155 (23%) and was protective against CMV (infection rate 4% vs. 27%, adjusted HR .07, .01-.72, p = .025), even though those receiving it were more likely to have received thymoglobulin (adjusted OR 10.5, 95% CI 2.01-55.0, p = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

CMV infection is common in R+ HTR and is associated with a high burden of disease and increased mortality. Patients who received valganciclovir prophylaxis were less likely to develop CMV infection, despite being at higher risk. These findings support the routine use of antiviral prophylaxis following heart transplantation in all CMV R+ patients.

Management of ganciclovir resistance cytomegalovirus infection with CMV hyperimmune globulin and leflunomide in seven cardiothoracic transplant recipients and literature review

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease caused by genetically resistant CMV poses a major challenge in solid organ transplant recipients, and the development of resistance is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Antiviral resistance affects 5%-12% of patients following ganciclovir (GCV) therapy, but is more common in individuals with specific underlying risk factors. These include the CMV D+R- serostatus, type of transplanted organ, dose and duration of (Val)GCV ([V]GCV) prophylaxis, peak viral loads, and the intensity of immunosuppressive therapy. Guideline recommendations for the management of GCV resistance (GanR) in solid organ transplant recipients are based on expert opinion as there is a lack of data from controlled trials. Second-line options to treat GanR include foscarnet (FOS) and cidofovir (CDV), but these drugs are often poorly tolerated due to high rates of toxicity, such as renal dysfunction and neutropenia. Here, we report seven cardiothoracic transplant recipients with GCV resistance CMV infection from our centre treated with CMV immunoglobulin (CMVIG) +/- leflunomide (LEF) and reviewed the literature on the use of these agents in this therapeutic setting.

[Prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplantation]

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common complication after heart transplantation, affecting almost half of all recipients. The clinical spectrum of this infection includes, in order of greater to lesser severity, latent infection, asymptomatic viremia, CMV syndrome and CMV disease. CMV is associated with rejection and vascular graft disease and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The factors most frequently involved in susceptibility to this infection and its severity are donor and recipient CMV serological status, the intensity of immunosuppression and the type of immunosuppressive agents used. The management strategies of this infection include universal or targeted prophylaxis, preemptive therapy and treatment of established disease. The use of preventive measures significantly reduces the incidence of symtomatic infection or CMV disease, which has been reported to be less than 3% in some recent series.

Viral pneumonias in immunocompromised adult hosts

Viral infections have always been considered pediatric diseases. However, viral pneumonia has become an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immuncompromised adults. Improved diagnostic techniques, such as the introduction of highly sensitive nucleic acid amplification tests, have not only allowed us to discover new viruses but also to determine the etiology of viral pneumonia in immunocompromised adult hosts. Unfortunately, only a few antiviral agents are available. Thus, early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to patient outcome. In this article, we review the most common viruses that have been implicated as etiologic agents of viral pneumonia in immunocompromised adults. We discuss the epidemiologic characteristics and clinical presentation of these viral infections and the most appropriate diagnostic approaches and therapies when available.

T10B9 monoclonal antibody: a short-acting nonstimulating monoclonal antibody that spares gammadelta T-cells and treats and prevents cellular rejection

T10B9.1A-31/MEDI-500 is a nonmitogenic immunoglobulin M kappa murine monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against the alpha-beta (αβ) heterodimer of the T-lymphocyte receptor complex. The hybridoma was first produced by fusing spleen cells from BALB/C mice immunized with human peripheral blood T-lymphocytes with SP2/O-Ag14 mutant myeloma cells. The mAb is produced and purified using multistep ion exchange and molecular sieve chromatography protocols. T10B9 has been used successfully to treat acute cellular rejection in renal transplantation and as an immunosuppression induction agent in heart and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Because T10B9 is nonmitogenic and causes minimal cytokine release, both treatment of rejection and induction of immunosuppression were accomplished with significantly fewer and milder untoward effects (cytokine release syndrome) than its comparator OKT3. Since T10B9 is directed against the αβ heterodimer of the CD3 epitope, it spares the gamma delta (γδ) region. These gamma delta (γδ) T cells have a unique role in the immune response controlling many serious human diseases and perhaps facilitating the development of immunologic tolerance. T10B9 has a relatively short duration of action, depleting T cells for only 10 to 14 days, unlike the protracted depletion seen with thymoglobulin and Campath-1H. There is no B-lymphocyte depletion with T10B9 as there is with both of the aforementioned reagents. The lack of prolonged lymphocyte depletion may account for less infection observed with T10B9 treatment.