1
|
Gowda M, Dilipbhai DM, Jalihal U, Kumar MP, Gowda S B, Jain A, Ganjoo N. Efficacy and Safety of Terlipressin Infusion in Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury (HRS-AKI): A Retrospective Observational Study. Cureus 2024; 16:e66581. [PMID: 39252705 PMCID: PMC11382811 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is an event that occurs in chronic liver disease (CLD) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Terlipressin, a vasopressin analog, is used for the treatment of portal hypertension-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and is found to be effective in the management of HRS-AKI. Continuous infusion of terlipressin maintains a high mean arterial pressure while reducing adverse events. It is better tolerated and equally effective at lower doses than intravenous boluses in patients with HRS-AKI. Aim of the study This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of terlipressin infusion at the rate of 4 mg/day in the treatment of HRS-AKI. Methods This retrospective study included patients who had HRS-AKI according to the modified International Club of Ascites (ICA) definition. Patients were started on a continuous intravenous infusion. The included patients received terlipressin 1 mg stat followed by a 4 mg infusion over 24 hours, and the infusion was continued until specific response criteria were met or for a maximum of seven days. Results In total, 136 patients were included in this study. The mean age of the study group was 45 years, the mean Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score was 11, the mean model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 30, and the mean serum creatinine was 2.46 mg/dl. A response to treatment in the form of reduction of serum creatinine was observed in 94 (69.1%) patients, 30 (22%) patients showed no response, and worsening of creatinine was seen in 12 (8.8%) patients. The mean duration of hospital stay was 7.6 days, the mean serum creatinine was 1.17 mg/dl at the end of treatment, and the mean CTP and MELD scores in treatment responders were nine and 27, respectively. A total of 29 (21.3%) of 136 patients had adverse events during the terlipressin infusion therapy. Conclusion Terlipressin infusion has sustained effects on splanchnic hemodynamics with fewer and less severe adverse events than intravenous bolus doses. Terlipressin infusion at a dose of 4 mg/day appeared to be well tolerated, with similar outcomes to that of 2 mg/day with a significantly lower albumin dose. These findings emphasize the importance of optimizing treatment protocols, particularly those favoring infusion methods, to enhance efficacy and minimize adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj Gowda
- Medical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, IND
| | - Dave Manan Dilipbhai
- Medical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, IND
| | - Umesh Jalihal
- Medical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, IND
| | - Madduri Pavan Kumar
- Medical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, IND
| | - Bharath Gowda S
- Medical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, IND
| | - Anil Jain
- Medical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, IND
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernández-Carrillo C, Li Y, Ventura-Cots M, Argemi J, Dai D, Clemente-Sánchez A, Duarte-Rojo A, Behari J, Ganesh S, Jonassaint NL, Tevar AD, Hughes CB, Humar A, Molinari M, Landsittel DP, Bataller R. Poor Outcomes of Patients With NAFLD and Moderate Renal Dysfunction or Short-Term Dialysis Receiving a Liver Transplant Alone. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10443. [PMID: 36568138 PMCID: PMC9784907 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The outcomes of patients with moderate renal impairment and the impact of liver disease etiology on renal function recovery after liver transplant alone (LTA) are largely unknown. We explored whether NAFLD patients with pre-LTA moderate renal dysfunction (GFR 25-45 ml/min/1.73 m2) may be more susceptible to develop post-LTA severe renal dysfunction (GFR<15 ml/min/1.73 m2) than ALD patients, as well as other overall outcomes. Using the UNOS/OPTN database, we selected patients undergoing liver transplant for NAFLD or ALD (2006-2016), 15,103 of whom received LTA. NAFLD patients with moderate renal dysfunction were more likely to develop subsequent GFR<15 ml/min/1.73 m2 than ALD patients (11.1% vs. 7.38%, p < 0.001). Patients on short-term dialysis pre-LTA (≤12 weeks) were more likely to develop severe renal dysfunction (31.7% vs. 18.1%), especially in NAFLD patients, and were more likely to receive a further kidney transplant (15.3% vs. 3.7%) and had lower survival (48.6% vs. 50.4%) after LTA (p < 0.001 for all). NAFLD was an independent risk factor for post-LTA severe renal dysfunction (HR = 1.2, p = 0.02). NAFLD patients with moderate renal dysfunction and those receiving short-term dialysis prior to LTA are at a higher risk of developing subsequent severe renal dysfunction. Underlying etiology of liver disease may play a role in predicting development and progression of renal failure in patients receiving LTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Fernández-Carrillo
- Center for Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States,CIBERehd. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain,Gastroenterología y Hepatología, IDIPHISA, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yaming Li
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Meritxell Ventura-Cots
- Center for Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States,CIBERehd. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Josepmaria Argemi
- Center for Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States,CIBERehd. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dongling Dai
- Center for Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Ana Clemente-Sánchez
- Center for Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States,CIBERehd. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andres Duarte-Rojo
- Center for Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States,Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Jaideep Behari
- Center for Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Swaytha Ganesh
- Center for Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States,Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Naudia L. Jonassaint
- Center for Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States,Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Amit D. Tevar
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Christopher B. Hughes
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Michele Molinari
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Douglas P. Landsittel
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Ramon Bataller
- Center for Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States,*Correspondence: Ramon Bataller,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lum EL, Cárdenas A, Martin P, Bunnapradist S. Current Status of Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation in the United States. Liver Transpl 2019; 25:797-806. [PMID: 30861294 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
On August 10, 2017, a formal policy was enacted in the United States that defined listing criteria for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation and priority for patients who received a liver transplantation (LT) and subsequently developed significant kidney disease after LT. This article reviews and summarizes the rationale for such policies, the policies themselves, and the potential impact on LT candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik L Lum
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrés Cárdenas
- Institute of Digestive Diseases and Metabolism, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul Martin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Suphamai Bunnapradist
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gupta K, Rani P, Rohatgi A, Verma M, Handa S, Dalal K, Jain A. Noradrenaline for reverting hepatorenal syndrome: a prospective, observational, single-center study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2018; 11:317-324. [PMID: 30271187 PMCID: PMC6151092 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s153858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of noradrenaline for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Background HRS represents the development of renal failure in cirrhotic patients. The standard treatment for HRS is terlipressin, which, as opposed to noradrenaline, is more expensive and less accessible in most tertiary care centers. Patients and methods Thirty consecutive patients with HRS type 1 received noradrenaline (1–4.0 mg/hour) and albumin for 14 days. The parameters recorded were: serum creatinine levels, creatinine clearance, mean arterial pressure (MAP), urine output, and serum sodium levels evaluated at baseline and on treatment days 1, 3, 7, and 14. Results Most patients achieved serum creatinine levels <1.5 mg/dL and were considered responders (22/30, 73%), whereas eight patients (27%) were nonresponders. At baseline, responders and nonresponders differed only regarding initial bilirubin levels and international normalized ratio values. Treatment duration was 7.5±3.2 days. Responders experienced a significant (p<0.05) decrease in serum creatinine levels (from 3.26±0.48 to 1.28±0.14 mg/dL), as well as a significant increase (p<0.05) in creatinine clearance (from 21±4.1 to 67.7±12.1 mL/min), urine output (from 583±41.1 to 1163±105 mL/day), MAP (from 79.2±2.94 to 93.9±2.34 mmHg), and serum sodium levels (from 125±2.01 to 132.3±1.39 mEq/L). In nonresponders, the MAP increased, but serum creatinine levels also increased, reflecting a decrease in creatinine clearance and urine output, with no significant change in serum sodium levels over the duration of the treatment. Conclusion In most patients, noradrenaline treatment induced systemic vasoconstriction resulting in HRS reversal, with acceptable safety, in agreement with previously reported outcomes of terlipressin treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamesh Gupta
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India,
| | - Pooja Rani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India,
| | - Anurag Rohatgi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India,
| | - Mukesh Verma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India,
| | - Shivani Handa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Associates of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keemi Dalal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India,
| | - Anand Jain
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Utako P, Emyoo T, Anothaisintawee T, Yamashiki N, Thakkinstian A, Sobhonslidsuk A. Clinical Outcomes after Liver Transplantation for Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:5362810. [PMID: 29992152 PMCID: PMC5994306 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5362810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) decreases survival of cirrhotic patients. The outcomes of HRS after liver transplantation (LT) were inconsistently reported. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis study to estimate the post-LT rates of death and HRS reversal. METHODS A thorough search of literatures was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and conference abstracts for reports on post-LT survival and HRS reversal. Data for the posttransplant rates of HRS reversal, death, and acute rejection were extracted. The rates were pooled using inverse variance method if there was no heterogeneity between studies. Otherwise, the random effect model was applied. RESULTS Twenty studies were included. Pooling HRS reversal rates indicated high heterogeneity with a pooled rate of 0.834 (95% CI: 0.709-0.933). The pooled overall death rates for HRS and non-HRS after LT were 0.25 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18-0.33) and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.14-0.26). The risk ratio of death between HRS and non-HRS patients was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.14-1.47, P < 0.001). The probability of death at 1, 3, and 5 years tended to be higher among HRS. CONCLUSIONS HRS is reversible in about 83% of patients after LT. However, the posttransplant mortality rate of HRS patients is still increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piyapon Utako
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thapanakul Emyoo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thunyarat Anothaisintawee
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Noriyo Yamashiki
- Organ Transplantation Unit, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ammarin Thakkinstian
- Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Abhasnee Sobhonslidsuk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sundaram SS, Mack CL, Feldman AG, Sokol RJ. Biliary atresia: Indications and timing of liver transplantation and optimization of pretransplant care. Liver Transpl 2017; 23:96-109. [PMID: 27650268 PMCID: PMC5177506 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2016] [Accepted: 09/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Biliary atresia (BA) is a progressive, fibro-obliterative disorder of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts in infancy. The majority of affected children will eventually develop end-stage liver disease and require liver transplantation (LT). Indications for LT in BA include failed Kasai portoenterostomy, significant and recalcitrant malnutrition, recurrent cholangitis, and the progressive manifestations of portal hypertension. Extrahepatic complications of this disease, such as hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension, are also indications for LT. Optimal pretransplant management of these potentially life-threatening complications and maximizing nutrition and growth require the expertise of a multidisciplinary team with experience caring for BA. The timing of transplant for BA requires careful consideration of the potential risk of transplant versus the survival benefit at any given stage of disease. Children with BA often experience long wait times for transplant unless exception points are granted to reflect severity of disease. Family preparedness for this arduous process is therefore critical. Liver Transplantation 23:96-109 2017 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shikha S. Sundaram
- Digestive Health Institute and Pediatric Liver Center, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Cara L. Mack
- Digestive Health Institute and Pediatric Liver Center, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Amy G. Feldman
- Digestive Health Institute and Pediatric Liver Center, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Ronald J. Sokol
- Digestive Health Institute and Pediatric Liver Center, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Won Y, Kim H, Lim B, Ahn H, Hwang M, Lee I. Effect of Perioperative Terlipressin on Postoperative Renal Function in Patients Who Have Undergone Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Transplant Proc 2015; 47:1917-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2015] [Revised: 04/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/16/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
8
|
Iglesias J, Frank E, Mehandru S, Davis JM, Levine JS. Predictors of renal recovery in patients with pre-orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) renal dysfunction. BMC Nephrol 2013; 14:147. [PMID: 23849513 PMCID: PMC3717032 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2012] [Accepted: 07/08/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal dysfunction occurs commonly in patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease. The use of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation has increased in the MELD scoring era. As patients may recover renal function after OLT, identifying factors predictive of renal recovery is a critical issue, especially given the scarcity of available organs. METHODS Employing the UNOS database, we sought to identify donor- and patient-related predictors of renal recovery among 1720 patients with pre-OLT renal dysfunction and transplanted from 1989 to 2005. Recovery of renal function post-OLT was defined as a composite endpoint of serum creatinine (SCr) ≤1.5 mg/dL at discharge and survival ≥29 days. Pre-OLT renal dysfunction was defined as any of the following: SCr ≥2 mg/dL at any time while awaiting OLT or need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) at the time of registration and/or OLT. RESULTS Independent predictors of recovery of renal function post-OLT were absence of hepatic allograft dysfunction, transplantation during MELD era, recipient female sex, decreased donor age, decreased recipient ALT at time of OLT, decreased recipient body mass index at registration, use of anti-thymocyte globulin as induction therapy, and longer wait time from registration. Contrary to popular belief, a requirement for RRT, even for prolonged periods in excess of 8 weeks, was not an independent predictor of failure to recover renal function post-OLT. CONCLUSION These data indicate that the duration of renal dysfunction, even among those requiring RRT, is a poor way to discriminate reversible from irreversible renal dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Iglesias
- Department Medicine subsection of Nephrology, UMDNJ School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ 08084, USA
- Department of Medicine subsection Nephrology, Jersey Shore University Medical Center Neptune, Neptune, NJ, USA
- Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Elliot Frank
- Department of Medicine, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ, USA
| | - Sushil Mehandru
- Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - John M Davis
- Department of Surgery, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ, USA
| | - Jerrold S Levine
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
- Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Teperman L. Living donation for the very ill patient with type I hepatorenal syndrome: are we ready? Liver Transpl 2012; 18:753-4. [PMID: 22511366 DOI: 10.1002/lt.23455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
10
|
Chok KSH, Fung JYY, Chan SC, Cheung TT, Sharr WW, Chan ACY, Fan ST, Lo CM. Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation for patients with preoperative type 1 hepatorenal syndrome and acute hepatic decompensation. Liver Transpl 2012; 18:779-785. [PMID: 22290625 DOI: 10.1002/lt.23401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
This study investigated the outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients with preoperative type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and acute hepatic decompensation. Prospectively collected data for 104 patients who had fulminant hepatic failure, acute decompensation of cirrhosis, or an acute flare of chronic hepatitis B were analyzed. Thirty-three patients (31.7%) had HRS (the HRS group), and 71 patients (68.3%) did not (the non-HRS group). The median follow-up period was 60 months. The HRS group had significantly more preoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (84.8% versus 60.6%, P = 0.01), worse preoperative blood test results (creatinine, 248 versus 88 μmol/L, P < 0.001; total bilirubin, 630 versus 555 μmol/L, P = 0.001), more hemodialysis (48.5% versus 0%, P < 0.001), more blood transfusions (9 versus 4 U, P < 0.001), longer postoperative ICU stays (8 versus 4 days, P < 0.001), worse postoperative blood test results (creatinine at 1 year, 108 versus 96 μmol/L, P = 0.006), and poorer overall survival (P < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, only HRS was associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio = 8.592, 95% confidence interval = 1.782-41.431, P = 0.007). In conclusion, HRS patients had worse postoperative renal function and overall survival than non-HRS patients. However, their 5-year overall survival rate was still nearly 80%, which is satisfactory. Therefore, LDLT can be considered for patients who have acute hepatic decompensation with or without HRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth S H Chok
- Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen Y, Luo F, Luo S, Wu Z, Zhou J. The augmenter of liver regeneration protects the kidneys after orthotopic liver transplantation possibly by upregulating HIF-1α and O2-sensitive K+ channels. Surg Today 2011; 41:382-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00595-010-4282-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2009] [Accepted: 01/04/2010] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
12
|
Oliver JA, Verna EC. Afferent mechanisms of sodium retention in cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome. Kidney Int 2010; 77:669-80. [PMID: 20147888 DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Cirrhosis induces extra-cellular fluid volume expansion, which when the disease is advanced can be severe and poorly responsive to therapy. Prevention and/or effective therapy for cirrhotic edema requires understanding the stimulus that initiates and maintains sodium retention. Despite much study, this stimulus remains unknown. Work over the last several years has shown that signals originating in the liver can influence a variety of systemic functions, including extra-cellular fluid volume control. We review work on the afferent mechanisms triggering sodium retention in cirrhosis and suggest that the data are most consistent with the existence of a sensor in the hepatic circulation that contributes to normal extra-cellular fluid volume control (that is, a 'volume' sensor) and that in cirrhosis, the sensor is pathologically activated by the hepatic circulatory abnormalities caused by the disease. Detailed analysis of the hepatic circulation in normal conditions and cirrhosis is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan A Oliver
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prognostic values of serum cystatin C and β2 microglobulin, urinary β2 microglobulin and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase in early acute renal failure after liver transplantation. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008. [DOI: 10.1097/00029330-200807020-00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|