Preliminary Evaluation of the New TACR Flex Method Versus MEIA Method in the Therapeutic Monitoring of Tacrolimus in Organ Transplantation

Overview of therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs: Analytical and clinical practices

Immunosuppressant drugs (ISDs) play a key role in short-term patient survival together with very low acute allograft rejection rates in transplant recipients. Due to the narrow therapeutic index and large inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability of ISDs, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is needed to dose adjustment for each patient (personalized medicine approach) to avoid treatment failure or side effects of the therapy. To achieve this, TDM needs to be done effectively. However, it would not be possible without the proper clinical practice and analytical tools. The purpose of this review is to provide a guide to establish reliable TDM, followed by a critical overview of the current analytical methods and clinical practices for the TDM of ISDs, and to discuss some of the main practical aspects of the TDM.

Comparison of whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations measured by different immunoassay systems

INTRODUCTION

Different measured values for tacrolimus were obtained with different automated immunoassays. We aimed to examine the differences in the blood tacrolimus concentrations measured by the major immunoassay systems commercially available in Japan.

METHODS

Whole-blood samples from 118 patients were assayed by 3 commercial assays: chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLIA), affinity column-mediated immunoassay (ACMIA), and enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT). Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for reference.

KEY FINDINGS

The correlation coefficient of immunoassay vs LC-MS/MS was excellent for ACMIA (.83) and CLIA (.81) and good for EMIT (.71). The mean error was negative for ACMIA and positive for CLIA and EMIT. The mean absolute error and root-mean-square error were almost the same for ACMIA and CLIA and lower than those for EMIT.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACMIA and CLIA yield considerably better results than the EMIT for monitoring blood tacrolimus concentrations.

Performance of the Dimension TAC assay and comparison of multiple platforms for the measurement of tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus is essential for reducing organ rejection and adverse effects. The measurement of tacrolimus in whole blood is taken by many automated platforms. We evaluated the analytical performance of the Dimension TAC assay, which is an upgraded reagent from the previous Dimension TACR assay.

METHODS

The evaluations involved determination of precision, linearity, detection capability, and reagent lot-to-lot variability between three lot numbers. Correlation studies were conducted using the Dimension TACR assay, Architect, Elecsys assay, and MassTrak LC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

The total coefficient of variation was below 10%. Acceptable linearity was observed in their respective reportable ranges. The limit of blank, limit of detection, and limit of quantification were 0.29, 0.47, and 0.81 ng/mL, respectively. Correlation analysis indicated that the Dimension TAC assay results were comparable to that of the Dimension TACR assay, Architect, and Elecsys results in liver and heart transplant patients. In kidney transplant patients, the Dimension TAC assay showed the poor correlation with Architect and Elecsys. The results from these assays were slightly higher than that of MassTrak. We found little lot-to-lot reagent variation among the reagents evaluated.

CONCLUSION

The overall analytical performance of the Dimension TAC assay is acceptable for therapeutic monitoring in clinical practice. Our study that compared different platforms may provide some useful information regarding which test method to use.

Current methods of the analysis of immunosuppressive agents in clinical materials: A review

More than 100000 solid organ transplantations are performed every year worldwide. Calcineurin (cyclosporine A, tacrolimus), serine/threonine kinase (sirolimus, everolimus) and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase inhibitor (mycophenolate mofetil), are the most common drugs used as immunosuppressive agents after solid organ transplantation. Immunosuppressive therapy, although necessary after transplantation, is associated with many adverse consequences, including the formation of secondary metabolites of drugs and the induction of their side effects. Calcineurin inhibitors are associated with nephrotoxicity, cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity; moreover, they increase the risk of many diseases after transplantation. The review presents a study of the movement of drugs in the body, including the processes of absorption, distribution, localisation in tissues, biotransformation and excretion, and also their accompanying side effects. Therefore, there is a necessity to monitor immunosuppressants, especially because these drugs are characterised by narrow therapeutic ranges. Their incorrect concentrations in a patient's blood could result in transplant rejection or in the accumulation of toxic effects. Immunosuppressive pharmaceuticals are macrolide lactones, peptides, and high molecular weight molecules that can be metabolised to several metabolites. Therefore the two main analytical methods used for their determination are high performance liquid chromatography with various detection methods and immunoassay methods. Despite the rapid development of new analytical methods of analysing immunosuppressive agents, the application of the latest generation of detectors and increasing sensitivity of such methods, there is still a great demand for the development of highly selective, sensitive, specific, rapid and relatively simple methods of immunosuppressive drugs analysis.

Conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus administration in liver transplant patient

BACKGROUND

Compliance to immunosuppressive therapy is critical to prevent organ rejection and possible graft loss. A once-daily Tacrolimus formulation that may improve adherence-to-therapy while allowing the same patient care strategies, total daily dose and monitoring techniques that have been recently approved. The present study was sought to evaluate the feasibility of this formulation among liver transplantation patients (OLT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients transplanted for at least 6 months were enrolled if they had stable doses of Tacrolimus over the last 3 months. Conversion from a twice to a once-daily regimen was based on a 1 mg:1 mg proportion. Tacrolimus blood levels were assessed at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 days as well and 6 months after conversion. We recorded liver and renal function as well as adverse events.

RESULTS

Among twenty-eight patients enrolled in the study including 23 males and 5 females the overall mean age was 59 +/- 8 years and the mean distance from OLT was 39 +/- 22. 32% of patients did not require any dose adjustment. In contrast, 43% required an increase (+0.6 +/- 0.3 mg/d), while 25%, a decrease (-0.5 +/- 0.0 mg/d) in the drug dose to maintain the same tacrolimus blood concentrations as at baseline. Ninety percent of patients stabilized blood levels within 45 days. None of the patients experienced adverse events or alterations in liver function.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed that once-daily Tacrolimus is a useful therapeutic option for OLT patients; however dose adjustments are frequently needed in the short term. The drug is safe and may improve patient compliance.

Opportunities to optimize tacrolimus therapy in solid organ transplantation: report of the European consensus conference

In 2007, a consortium of European experts on tacrolimus (TAC) met to discuss the most recent advances in the drug/dose optimization of TAC taking into account specific clinical situations and the analytical methods currently available and drew some recommendations and guidelines to help clinicians with the practical use of the drug. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and more recently pharmacogenetic approaches aid physicians to individualize long-term therapies as TAC demonstrates a high degree of both between- and within-individual variability, which may result in an increased risk of therapeutic failure if all patients are administered a uniform dose. TAC has undoubtedly benefited from therapeutic drug monitoring, but interpretation of the blood concentration is confounded by the relative differences between the assays. Single time points, limited sampling strategies, and area under concentration-time curve have all been considered to determine the most appropriate sampling procedure that correlates with efficacy. Therapeutic trough TAC concentration ranges have changed since the initial introduction of the drug, while still maintaining adequate immunosuppression and avoiding drug-related adverse effects. Pharmacodynamic markers have also been considered advantageous to the clinician, which may better reflect efficacy and safety, taking into account the between-individual variability rather than whole blood concentrations. The choice of method, differences between methods, and potential pitfalls of the method should all be considered when determining TAC concentrations. The recommendations of this consensus meeting regarding the analytical methods include the following: encourage the development and promote the use of analytical methods displaying a lower limit of quantification (1 ng/mL), perform careful validation when implementing a new analytical assay, participate in external proficiency testing programs, promote the use of certified material as calibrators in high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection methods, and take account of the assay and intermethod bias when comparing clinical trial outcomes. It is also important to consider that TAC concentrations may also be influenced by other factors such as specific pharmacokinetic characteristics associated with the population, drug interactions, pharmacogenetics, adverse events that may alter TAC concentrations, and any change in the oral formulation that may result in pharmacokinetic changes. This meeting emphasized the importance of obtaining multicenter prospective trials to assess the efficacy of alternative strategies to TAC trough concentrations whether it is other single time points or area under the concentration-time curve Bayesian estimation using limited sampling strategies and to select, standardize, and validate routine biomarkers of TAC pharmacodynamics.