Better Mycophenolic Acid 12-Hour Trough Level After Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium in Patients With Gastrointestinal Intolerance to Mycophenolate Mofetil

Improvement in gastrointestinal and health-related quality of life outcomes after conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in liver transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate improvement in gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in liver transplant recipients switched from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS).

METHODS

A multicenter, open-label, single-arm study was undertaken in maintenance liver transplant recipients who reported GI complications with MMF therapy. The patients were switched to equimolar doses of EC-MPS at baseline. The primary end point was the change in the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) total score after 6 to 8 weeks of treatment with EC-MPS. Other key assessments for GI symptoms and HRQoL included the GSRS subscores, the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Psychological General Well-Being Index, and the Overall Treatment Effect (OTE). Paired t-test was used to assess the difference in the mean score changes over time.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were enrolled and switched to equimolar doses of EC-MPS. After 6 to 8 weeks of EC-MPS treatment, mean GSRS total score improved significantly from 2.88 ± 0.66 to 2.10 ± 0.78. Mean improvement in GSRS total score (-0.77 score points; P = .001) exceeded the minimal clinically important difference. Significant improvements were observed in all GSRS subscales (P < .05), GIQLI total scores (P = .001), and GIQLI subscales "GI symptoms" (P < .001) and "physical function" (0.013). Patients who continued EC-MPS reported sustained benefits compared with patients who switched back to MMF after 6 to 8 weeks of treatment with EC-MPS. On the OTE scale, improvement in symptoms was reported in 76.5% and 61.8% of the patients as perceived by the physicians and the patients. Improvement in HRQoL was reported by 41.2% of the patients. No deaths, biopsy proven acute rejections, or graft losses were reported during the study.

CONCLUSION

Conversion from MMF to EC-MPS was associated with a significant improvement in GI symptoms and HRQoL in liver transplant recipients.

Randomized trial of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in multi-system autoimmune disease

Background

The use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in autoimmune disease is often limited by adverse effects. In this single-centre, open label, parallel design study, we investigated whether enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (MS) is better tolerated and therefore more efficacious than MMF in primary systemic vasculitis (PSV) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

Forty patients with vasculitis or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) due to commence MMF for active disease or remission maintenance were randomized to receive either 1440 mg/day MS or 2000 mg/day MMF (18 PSV, 2 SLE per group) in addition to corticosteroids. Random allocation was performed by minimization for age, diagnosis and renal function using a computer algorithm. Twenty-five were treated for active disease (5 first-line therapy, 20 salvage therapy) and 15 for remission maintenance. The composite primary end point was treatment failure and/or drug intolerance over 12 months. Treatment failure was defined as failure to achieve remission by 6 months or disease relapse and treatment intolerance was defined as inability to tolerate and maintain the target dose of MS or MMF within 12 months.

Results

Forty patients were included in the analyses. MS was associated with a lower primary end point rate [hazard ratio (HR) 0.37; 95% CI 0.17–0.80; P = 0.012] (11/20, 55% patients) compared with MMF (17/20, 85% patients). Treatment failure alone was less common in the MS group (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.095–0.82; P = 0.020), although drug intolerance did not differ between groups (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.20–1.42; P = 0.21). Despite randomization, patients in the MMF group may have had a higher baseline risk for treatment failure; more MMF patients had refractory disease and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's). A glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤40 mL/min was associated with intolerance. Serious adverse events were common (55% MMF and 45% MS patients).

Conclusions

No differences in treatment tolerance were observed between the MS and MMF groups. Despite similar treatment intolerance, MS was associated with improved efficacy in PSV and SLE compared with MMF. However, baseline group imbalances in factors potentially affecting remission and relapse may have influenced the results. Treatment intolerance was common and strongly associated with low GFR. Further treatment trials are warranted to investigate the effect of GFR on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes (ISRCTN83027184; EUDRACT 2005-002207-16; Funding Novartis UK).

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium immunosuppression in renal transplant patients: efficacy and dosing

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a mycophenolic acid (MPA) formulation, has improved both short- and long-term outcomes following renal transplantation, but is often associated with gastrointestinal (GI) complications that can lead to dose reduction or discontinuation, potentially jeopardizing patient outcomes. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) delivers equivalent MPA exposure to MMF and offers the potential to reduce GI burden (while maintaining patient safety). Here we review the efficacy of EC-MPS compared with MMF in renal transplant patients in terms of biopsy-proven acute rejection and graft loss, and examine the use of EC-MPS in newer regimens such as intensified dosing and calcineurin inhibitor minimization.