Efficacy of Renal Preservation: Comparative Study of Celsior and University of Wisconsin Solutions

Lactated Ringer as Preservation Solution in Living Donor Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Optimal organ preservation remains a critical hallmark event in renal transplantation as it is the supply line. Previous studies have shown that the choice of preservation solution may affect transplant outcomes. In this study, we aimed to present the early follow-up results of the graft and patients, using lactated Ringer to preserve kidney allografts with living donors.

METHODS

The results of 97 living donor transplant operations performed in Sanko University Hospital were evaluated retrospectively. The patient's evaluation included demographics, dialysis time duration, renal replacement method, primary disease, comorbidity, surgical and clinical complications in the acute period, graft functions, blood levels of calcineurin inhibitor drugs, anastomotic renal artery, warm ischemia, and cold ischemia times.

RESULTS

Donor (49 men, 50.5%) and recipient (58 men, 59.7%) demographics, HLA compatibility (mismatch), hospitalization days, and length of warm and cold ischemic time are summarized in Table 1. Primary nonfunction was not defined in any patients, but delayed graft function was observed during the follow-up of 3 patients (3.09%), who were all hypotensive in the post-transplantation period, and positive inotropic infusion was needed for hemodynamic stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Lactated Ringer demonstrated efficacy in terms of patient and graft survival, and its lower cost represents a financial advantage, so it can be used in living donor kidney transplantation because it is safe, effective, and inexpensive. Standard preservation solutions may still be recommended in cases with long cold ischemia times, such as paired exchange transplants and cadaveric transplants. Thus, randomized controlled studies are needed for further investigation.

Renal Procurement: Techniques for Optimizing the Quality of the Graft in the Cadaveric Setting

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for end-stage renal disease. However, due to organ shortage, suboptimal grafts are increasingly being used.

RECENT FINDINGS

We carried out a review on the methods and techniques of organ optimization in the cadaveric setting. Donor care is the first link in a chain of care. Right after brain death, there is a set of changes, of which hormonal and hemodynamic changes are the most relevant. Several studies have been conducted to determine which drugs to administer, although in most cases, the results are not definitive. The main goal seems rather achieve a set of biochemical and hemodynamic objectives. The ischemia-reperfusion injury is a critical factor for kidney damage in transplantation. One of the ways found to deal with this type of injury is preconditioning. Local and remote ischemic preconditioning has been studied for various organs, but studies on the kidney are scarce. A new promising area is pharmacological preconditioning, which is taking its first steps. Main surgical techniques were established in the late twentieth century. Some minor new features have been introduced to deal with anatomical variations or the emergence of donation after circulatory death. Finally, after harvesting, it is necessary to ensure the best conditions for the kidneys until the time of transplantation. Much has evolved since static cold preservation, but the best preservation conditions are yet to be determined. Conservation in the cold has come to be questioned, and great results have appeared at temperatures closer to physiological.

Preservation solutions for static cold storage of abdominal allografts: which is best?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To update the reader on the recent literature in liver, kidney, pancreas, and intestine static cold preservation, and to identify which solutions are most advantageous for each organ.

RECENT FINDINGS

The comparison of randomized trials of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK), Celsior, and University of Wisconsin solutions has shown equivalent risk of delayed graft function after kidney transplantation. Similar outcomes have been observed after pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin, HTK, and Celsior solution. In live-donor liver transplantation, University of Wisconsin and HTK solution have shown equivalent results, whereas in the recent trials of deceased-donor liver transplantation, University of Wisconsin, HTK, and Celsior solutions have shown equivalence. Contrary to the most clinical trials, national registry data in kidney, pancreas, and liver transplantation demonstrate more detrimental effects and earlier graft loss after preservation with HTK versus University of Wisconsin solution. Early outcomes after intestinal transplantation with University of Wisconsin or HTK solution have shown no significant difference and animal studies indicate intraluminal preservation may be beneficial.

SUMMARY

The University of Wisconsin solution is the standard criterion static cold preservation for the procurement of liver, kidney, pancreas, and intestine. University of Wisconsin, HTK, and Celsior solutions all provide similar allograft outcomes in most clinical trials, but subtle differences have become more apparent in the recent studies and registry reports.

Perspectives on abdominal organ preservation solutions: a comparative literature review

Various preservation solutions are used for kidney, liver, pancreas, small intestine, and multiorgan recoveries and transplants. The effectiveness of these solutions, primarily measured by ability to preserve the organ and graft survival, was analyzed. The 2 most common solutions used for intra-abdominal organs are University of Wisconsin Solution (UW)/Viaspan and Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK)/Custodiol solution. Outcomes for liver, pancreas, and kidney allografts preserved with these 2 solutions are similar. Although HTK solution shows conflicting results with respect to pancreatic cellular edema, researchers in several studies have noted that HTK solution may be more protective than UW solution against biliary complications in liver transplant. In kidney recoveries, HTK solution may be associated with higher graft loss and increased delayed graft function in marginal deceased donors but had lower incidence of delayed graft function in living donors when compared with UW. UW remains the reference standard for use during multiorgan recoveries but is experiencing strong competition from HTK and other alternative solutions. Some researchers suggest that Celsior's comparable results in abdominal organs and viability for thoracic organs makes it a strong competitor, especially in multiorgan recoveries. Each solution has benefits accompanied by disadvantages. Although it may not be feasible, when considering single-organ recoveries, consideration of alternative solutions may be warranted.

Efficacy and safety of Celsior preservation fluid in liver transplantation: one-year follow up of a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized study

The purpose of this prospective, nine-center, non-randomized study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Celsior preservation fluid in liver transplantation using unselected donors. As data comparing allograft outcomes following liver transplantation using Celsior and University of Wisconsin (UW) preservation fluids are limited, we also compared our cohort with matched controls selected from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) who received total liver grafts preserved with UW solution during the same period. One hundred and forty patients who received livers preserved with Celsior were included. The primary endpoint, graft loss at one-yr post-transplantation, was observed in 24 patients (17.1%) which was not significantly different from the 20.0% pre-defined threshold rate (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.9, 23.4; p=0.398). Predictive factors for graft loss on univariate analysis were moderate-to-severe steatosis on the donor graft (5/22 patients with graft loss vs. 8/107 patients without, p=0.046) and duration of warm ischemia (1.4±1.1 h in patients with graft loss vs. 0.9±0.5 h in patients without, p=0.034). Hepatic artery thrombosis and stenosis occurred in seven (5.0%) and six (4.3%) patients, respectively. The comparison of our patients to 420 ELTR controls showed that one-yr graft survival rates (Celsior: 82.9%, 95% CI 75.8, 88.2; UW: 78.6%, 95% CI 74.4, 82.2) and Kaplan-Meier one-yr graft survival distributions (p=0.285) were similar. Within the cold ischemia time achieved in our study, liver preservation with Celsior appeared efficient and safe. Comparison with ELTR patients suggested that liver allograft survival was similar using Celsior or UW solution for preservation of unselected donor grafts.

Organ Preservation: Current Concepts and New Strategies for the Next Decade

SUMMARY: Organ transplantation has developed over the past 50 years to reach the sophisticated and integrated clinical service of today through several advances in science. One of the most important of these has been the ability to apply organ preservation protocols to deliver donor organs of high quality, via a network of organ exchange to match the most suitable recipient patient to the best available organ, capable of rapid resumption of life-sustaining function in the recipient patient. This has only been possible by amassing a good understanding of the potential effects of hypoxic injury on donated organs, and how to prevent these by applying organ preservation. This review sets out the history of organ preservation, how applications of hypothermia have become central to the process, and what the current status is for the range of solid organs commonly transplanted. The science of organ preservation is constantly being updated with new knowledge and ideas, and the review also discusses what innovations are coming close to clinical reality to meet the growing demands for high quality organs in transplantation over the next few years.

Machine perfusion or cold storage in organ transplantation: indication, mechanisms, and future perspectives

Most organs are currently preserved by cold storage (CS) prior to transplantation. However, as more so called marginal donor organs are utilized, machine perfusion has regained clinical interest. Recent studies have demonstrated advantages of pulsatile perfusion over CS preservation for kidney transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether there is a significant benefit of one preservation method over the other in general, or, whether the utilization of particular preservation approaches needs to be linked to organ characteristics. Proposed protective mechanisms of pulsatile perfusion remain largely obscure. It can be speculated that pulsatile perfusion may not only provide nutrition and facilitate the elimination of toxins but also trigger protective mechanisms leading to the amelioration of innate immune responses. Those aspects may be of particular relevance when utilizing grafts with suboptimal quality which may have an increased vulnerability to ischemia/reperfusion injury and compromised repair mechanisms. This review aims to enunciate the principles of organ perfusion and preservation as they relate to indication, aspects of organ protection and to highlight future developments.