Evolution of Right Cardiac Pressures During the First Year After Heart Transplantation

Perioperative Management of Heart Transplantation: A Clinical Review

In this clinical review, the authors summarize the perioperative management of heart transplant patients with a focus on hemodynamics, immunosuppressive strategies, hemostasis and hemorrage, and the prevention and treatment of infectious complications.

Impact of basal heart rate on long-term prognosis of heart transplant patients

Previous studies in patients with heart failure have shown that an elevated basal heart rate (HR) is associated with a poor outcome. Our aim with this study was to investigate if this relationship is also present in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. From 2003 until 2010, 256 HTx performed in our center were recruited. Patients who required pacemaker, heart-lung transplants, pediatrics, retransplants, and those patients with a survival of less than 1 year were excluded. The final number included in the analysis was 191. Using the HR obtained by EKG during elective admission at 1 year post-HTx and the survival rate, an ROC-curve was performed. The best point under the curve was achieved with 101 beats per minute (bpm), so patients were divided in two groups according to their HR. A comparison between survival curves of both groups was performed (Kaplan-Meier). Subsequently, a multivariate analysis considering HR and other variables with influence on survival according to the literature was carried out. A total of 136 patients were included in the group with HR ≤100 bpm, and 55 in the one with HR >100 bpm. There were no basal differences in both groups except for primary graft failure, which was more frequent in the >100 bpm group (30.9 vs. 17%, P = 0.033). Patients with ≤100 bpm had a better long prognosis (P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis proved that high HR was an independent predictor of mortality. Our study shows that HR should be considered as a prognosis factor in HTx patients.

Long-term pulmonary vascular reactivity after orthotopic heart transplantation by the biatrial versus the bicaval technique

INTRODUCTION

Advantages of the bicaval versus the biatrial technique have been reported, emphasizing atrial electrical stability and less tricuspid regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the impact of the surgical technique on long-term pulmonary pressures, contractility, and graft valvular behavior after heart transplantation.

METHODS

Among 400 orthotopic heart transplantation recipients from 1985 to 2010, we selected 30 consecutive patients who had survived beyond 3 years. The biatrial versus bicaval surgical technique groups included 15 patients each. Their preoperative clinical characteristics were similar. None of the patients displayed a pulmonary vascular resistance or pulmonary artery pressure over 6U Wood or 60 mm Hg, respectively. We evaluated invasive hemodynamic parameters during routine endomyocardial biopsies. Two-dimensional echocardiographic parameters were obtained from routine examinations.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences regarding right atrial pressure, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac index, systolic blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, and mitral regurgitation (P > .05). Tricuspid regurgitation increased significantly over the 3 years of observation only among the biatrial group (P = .0212). In both groups, the right atrial pressure, pulmonary wedge capillary pressure, transpulmonary gradient, and pulmonary vascular resistance decreased significantly (P < .05) from the pre- to the postoperative examination. In both groups cardiac index and systemic blood pressure increased significantly after transplantation (P < .05). Comparative analysis of the groups only showed significant differences regarding right atrial pressure and degree of tricuspid regurgitation; the bicaval group showing the best performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical techniques ensure adequate left ventricular function in the long term; however, the bicaval technique provided better trends in hemodynamic performance, as well as a lower incidence and severity of tricuspid valve dysfunction.