Observation of efficacy and safety of converting the calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy

Autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy: a pilot study

Background

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-based therapy has shown promising results for renal injury. In this study, the efficacy and safety of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) in treating nonspecific interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) were evaluated.

Methods

From March 2011 to January 2013, 11 renal transplanted patients with IFTA were recruited. At baseline, patients were given one intra-arterial infusion of BM-MSCs; 7 days and 1 month later, another two intravenous infusions of cells were followed. Serum creatinine, creatinine clearance rate, and serum cystatin-C at baseline and 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the intra-arterial infusion of BM-MSCs were used to assess renal function. At baseline and 6 months, histological examination based on hematoxylin-eosin, Masson’s trichrome and periodic acid-Schiff staining and immunohistochemistry for transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) was performed. Adverse events were recorded to evaluate the safety of BM-MSCs treatment.

Results

At 12 months, the renal function of 6 patients (54.5%) was improved, 3 (27.3%) were stable and 2 (18.2%) were worsened. At 6 months, the mean IFTA scores of all participators were similar with the baseline (1.73 ± 0.41 vs.1.50 ± 0.0.77, p = 0.242); however, it was significantly decreased when only 6 patients with improved renal function were analyzed (1.67 ± 0.41 vs. 1.08 ± 0.20, p = 0.013). Besides, decreased expression of TGF-β1 and CTGF were also observed at 6 months. During 1 year follow-up period, only two minor complications including infection and allergy were observed.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated that autologous BM-MSCs are safe and beneficial for IFTA patients. Abbreviations: MSCs: mesenchymal stem cells; BM-MSCs: marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells; IFTA: interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; CAN: chronic allograft nephropathy; CNIs: calcineurin inhibitors; Scr: serum creatinine; CCr: creatinine clearance rate; Cys-C: cystatin-C; TGF-β1: transforming growth factor β1; CTGF: connective tissue growth factor

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies

Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and reduces the risk of mortality. A majority of the success of kidney transplantation is attributable to the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), cyclosporine and tacrolimus, and their ability to reduce acute rejection rates. However, long-term graft survival rates have not improved over time, and although controversial, evidence does suggest a role of chronic CNI toxicity in this failure to improve outcomes. Consequently, there is interest in reducing or removing CNIs from immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to improve outcomes. Several strategies exist to spare calcineurin inhibitors, including use of agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), sirolimus, everolimus or belatacept to facilitate late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal, beyond 6 mo post-transplant; or using these agents to plan early withdrawal within 6 mo; or to avoid the CNIs all together using CNI-free regimens. Although numerous reviews have been written on this topic, practice varies significantly between centers. This review organizes the data based on patient characteristics (i.e., the baseline immunosuppressive regimen) as a means to aid the practicing clinician in caring for their patients, by matching up their situation with the relevant literature. The current review, the first in a series of two, examines the potential of immunosuppressive agents to facilitate late CNI withdrawal beyond 6 mo post-transplant, and has demonstrated that the strongest evidence resides with MMF/MPS. MMF or MPS can be successfully introduced/maintained to facilitate late CNI withdrawal and improve renal function in the setting of graft deterioration, albeit with an increased risk of acute rejection and infection. Additional benefits may include improved blood pressure, lipid profile and serum glucose. Sirolimus has less data directly comparing CNI withdrawal to an active CNI-containing regimen, but modest improvement in short-term renal function is possible, with an increased risk of proteinuria, especially in the setting of baseline renal dysfunction and/or proteinuria. Renal outcomes may be improved when sirolimus is used in combination with MMF. Although data with everolimus is less robust, results appear similar to those observed with sirolimus.