Metabolic Changes Following Conversion From an Anticalcineurin-Based Therapy to an Everolimus-Based One: A Single-Center Experience

Chronic everolimus treatment of high-fat diet mice leads to a reduction in obesity but impaired glucose tolerance

Everolimus, which inhibits mTOR kinase activity and is clinically used in graft rejection treatment, may have a two‐sided influence on metabolic syndrome; its role in obesity and hyperglycemic in animals and humans, however, has been explored insufficiently. This study further determined how continual everolimus treatment affects glucose homeostasis and body weight control in C57BL6/J mice with obesity. An obesity mouse model was developed by administering a high‐fat diet (HFD) to C57BL6/J mice over 12 weeks. The experimental group, while continuing their HFD consumption, were administered everolimus daily for 8 weeks. Metabolic parameters, glucose tolerance, fatty liver score, endocrine profile, insulin sensitivity index (ISI), insulin resistance (IR) index, and Akt phosphorylation, GLUT4, TNF‐α, and IL‐1 levels were measured in vivo. Compared with the control group, the everolimus group gained less body weight and had smaller adipocytes and lower fat pad weight; triglyceride (serum and hepatic), patatin‐like phospholipase domain‐containing 3, and fatty acid synthase levels; fatty liver scores; and glucose tolerance test values—all despite consuming more food. However, the everolimus group exhibited decreased ISI and muscle Akt phosphorylation and GLUT4 expression as well as impaired glucose tolerance and serum TNF‐α and IL‐1β levels—even when insulin levels were high. In conclusion, continual everolimus treatment may lead to diabetes with glucose intolerance and IR.

Cyclosporine versus everolimus: effects on the glomerulus

Inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) have been associated with proteinuria. We studied the development of proteinuria in renal transplant recipients (RTR) treated with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus in comparison with a calcineurin inhibitor. We related the presence of proteinuria to histopathological glomerular findings in two-yr protocol biopsies. In a single-center study, nested in a multicenter randomized controlled trial, we determined eGFR, proteinuria, and renal biopsy data (light- and electron microscopy) of RTR receiving prednisolone/everolimus (P/EVL) (n = 16) in comparison with patients treated with prednisolone/cyclosporine A (P/CsA) (n = 7). All patients had been on the above-described maintenance immunosuppression for 18 months. Renal function at two yr after transplantation did not differ between patients receiving P/EVL or P/CsA (eGFR 45.5 vs. 45.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Proteinuria was slightly increased in P/EVL vs. P/CsA group (0.29 vs. 0.14 g/24 h, p = 0.06). There were no differences in light- or electron microscopic findings. We could not demonstrate increased podocyte effacement or changes in glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness in P/EVL-treated patients. In conclusion, long-term treatment with everolimus leaves the GBM and podocytes unaffected.

Long-term use of everolimus in lung transplant patients

Everolimus has been successfully used in solid organ transplantation, especially of the heart and kidney, but much less often in lung transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term use of everolimus in lung transplantation in Chile. We retrospectively analyzed patients receiving everolimus between 2005 and 2010 in terms of indication, lung and kidney function, rejection episodes, infections, malignancy appearance, and adverse events. Ten of 60 lung transplant recipients were converted to everolimus (16%) at some point after transplantation: four due to calcineurin inhibitor nephropathy (RD); four bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS); one lymphoma; and one, graft pulmonary fibrosis. Among patients with RD, at a mean follow-up of 25 months (range = 3-60), renal function remained stable with baseline of 42.7 mL/min and final creatinine clearance of 45.7 mL/min; lung function did not deteriorate. BOS patients, with an average of 30 months' follow-up (range = 12-48), showed baseline forced expiratory volume in the first second of 49% (r: 41-57) without variation in three patients, but with a decrease in another one after 12 months. One patient discontinued everolimus due to intolerance after 1 year. Two patients developed neoplasias: skin cancer and multiple myeloma. There were 14 infection episodes in seven patients, including 10 involving the respiratory tract infections. Only one patient developed dyslipidemia after everolimus initiation. Two patients died: one due to multiple myeloma and another to BOS. There was no rejection episode. Everolimus was effective and safe when used in combination with low doses of calcineurin inhibitor over long-term follow-up of lung transplant patients.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression using everolimus (Certican) after heart transplantation: 2 years' follow-up from the University Hospital Münster

BACKGROUND

Everolimus is a proliferation-signal inhibitor which was introduced for heart transplant recipients in 2004. To date, there are only sparse data about long-term calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression using everolimus.

METHODS

After heart transplantation, patients receiving everolimus were consecutively enrolled. Reasons for switching to everolimus were side effects of CNI immunosuppression, such as deterioration of kidney function and recurrent rejection episodes. All 60 patients underwent standardized switching protocols, 42 patients completed 24-month follow-up. Blood was sampled for lipid status, renal function, routine controls, and levels of immunosuppressive agents. On days 0, 14, and 28, and then every 3 months, echocardiography and physical examination were performed.

RESULTS

After switching to everolimus, most patients recovered from the side effects. Renal function improved significantly after 24 months (creatinine, 2.1 ± 0.6 vs 1.8 ± 1 mg/dL; P < .001; creatinine clearance, 41.8 ± 22 vs 48.6 ± 21.8 mL/min; P < .001). Median blood pressure increased from 120.0/75.0 mm Hg at baseline to 123.8/80.0 mm Hg at month 24 (P values .008 and .003 for systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively). Tremor, peripheral edema, hirsutism, and gingival hyperplasia markedly improved. Levels of interleukin-6 were stable between baseline and 24-month levels. Temporary adverse events occurred in 8 patients [13.3%: interstitial pneumonia (n = 2), skin disorders (n = 2); reactivated hepatitis B (n = 1), and fever of unknown origin (n = 3)].

CONCLUSION

CNI-free immunosuppression using everolimus is safe, with excellent efficacy in maintenance of heart transplant recipients. Arterial hypertension and renal function significantly improved. CNI-induced side effects, such as tremor, peripheral edema, hirsutism, and gingival hyperplasia, markedly improved in most patients.

Prospective study of everolimus with calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in maintenance heart transplant patients: results at 2 years

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined everolimus therapy with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal in maintenance heart transplant patients.

METHODS

In a prospective, single-arm, single-center study, CNI-treated heart transplant patients were converted to everolimus and were followed up for 24 months. The primary endpoints were kidney function and arterial hypertension at 12 and 24 months after conversion.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were recruited (mean time posttransplant 5.6±3.7 years), 55 of whom (91.7%) had renal impairment. Mean creatinine clearance increased from 43.6±21.1 mL/min to 49.5±21.2 mL/min at month 24 (P=0.02). Median blood pressure increased from 120/80 mm Hg at baseline to 122.5/80 mm Hg (P=0.008 and 0.006 for systolic and diastolic pressure, respectively). Lipid parameters did not change significantly over the 24-month follow-up. Early resolution of most non-renal CNI-related adverse events was sustained. CNI therapy was re-introduced at a mean of 309 days (range, 31-684 days) in eight patients after month 6 due to adverse events (n=13) or withdrawal of consent (n=2). No significant changes in cardiac function parameters were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

CNI-free immunosuppression with everolimus is an effective and safe option in selected heart transplant maintenance patients. Most adverse effects under everolimus occurred early after conversion and generally resolved without intervention within a few weeks. Refining selection criteria may reduce the need to re-introduce CNI therapy.