Mycophenolate Mofetil Monotherapy in Patients Who Underwent Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C Cirrhosis

Mycophenolate mofetil inhibits hepatitis C virus replication in human hepatic cells

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation and the major cause of graft failure. A widely used immunosuppressant, cyclosporine A (CsA), for people who receive organ transplantation, has been recognized to have the ability to inhibit HCV replication both in vivo and in vitro. In this study, we investigated the effects of several other immunosuppressants, including mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rapamycin and FK506, on HCV replication in human hepatic cells. MMF treatment of hepatic cells before or during HCV infection significantly suppressed full cycle viral replication, as evidenced by decreased expression of HCV RNA, protein and production of infectious virus. In contrast, rapamycin and FK506 had little effect on HCV replication. Investigation of the mechanism(s) disclosed that the inhibition of HCV replication by MMF was mainly due to its depletion of guanosine, a purine nucleoside crucial for synthesis of guanosine triphosphate, which is required for HCV RNA replication. The supplement of exogenous guanosine could reverse most of anti-HCV effect of mycophenolate mofetil. These data indicate that MMF, through the depletion of guanosine, inhibits full cycle HCV JFH-1 replication in human hepatic cells. It is of interest to further determine whether MMF is indeed beneficial for HCV-infected transplant recipients in future clinical studies.

Strategies to prevent or reduce acute and chronic kidney injury in liver transplantation

Acute kidney injury (AKI) has a major impact on short- and long-term survival in liver transplant (LT) patients. There is no currently accepted uniform definition of AKI, which would facilitate standardization of the care of patients with AKI and to improve and enhance collaborative research efforts. New promising biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin or kidney injury molecule-1 have been developed for the prevention of delayed AKI treatment. Early dialysis has been shown to be beneficial in patients with AKI stage III according to the classification of the Acute Kidney Injury Network, whereas treatment with loop diuretics or dopamine is associated with worse outcome. The mainstay for the prevention of AKI seems to be avoidance of volume depletion and maintenance of a mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg. Although the aetiology of chronic kidney disease in transplant recipients may be multifactorial, calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-induced nephrotoxicity significantly contributes to the development of renal dysfunction over time after LT. The delayed introduction of CNI at minimal doses has shown to be safe and effective for the preservation of kidney function. Other strategies to overcome CNI nephrotoxicity include CNI minimization protocols or CNI withdrawal and conversion to mycophenolate mofetil or the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimens. However, CNI avoidance may bear a higher rejection risk. Thus, more results from randomized-controlled studies are urgently warranted to determine which drug combinations are the most beneficial approaches for the potential introduction of CNI-free immunosuppressive regimens.

Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in liver transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Complete conversion of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) immunosuppressant therapy to non-nephrotoxic agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is controversial, but may be safe in selected patients, although appropriate protocols and long-term benefits of conversion are not well reported.

METHODS

We analyzed all liver transplant (LT) recipients at our institution who were converted from CNI-based therapy to MMF monotherapy because of renal dysfunction (n = 23) and compared them with patients remaining on CNI-based therapy (n = 23). Renal function, rejection episodes, and markers of CNI-related comorbidities (lipid profile, blood pressure, and glycosylated hemoglobin) were noted.

RESULTS

Overall, serum creatinine (SCr) and calculated glomerular filtration rate improved on MMF monotherapy. This improvement was significant when compared with patients who remained on CNI-based therapy. Improvement was most pronounced in patients with milder renal dysfunction (SCr <2.2 mg/dL prior to conversion) (n = 14) with decrease in SCr from 1.63 ± 0.29 to 1.34 ± 0.26 mg/dL (p = 0.02) at last follow-up. Five patients on MMF monotherapy (21.7%) progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), while only two (8.7%) had rejection episodes following conversion. Clinical markers of CNI-related comorbidities also improved. MMF monotherapy was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our data support the safety and efficacy of CNI to MMF monotherapy conversion.

Mycophenolate monitoring in liver, thoracic, pancreas, and small bowel transplantation: a consensus report

Assessing the value of mycophenolic acid (MPA) monitoring outside renal transplantation is hindered by the absence of any trial comparing fixed-dose and concentration-controlled therapy. However, in liver and thoracic transplantation particularly, clinical trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and case series have described MPA efficacy, exposure/efficacy relationships, pharmacokinetic variability, and clinical outcomes relating to plasma MPA concentrations. On the basis of this evidence, this report identifies MPA as an immunosuppressant for which the combination of variable disposition, efficacy, and adverse effects contributes to interindividual differences seemingly in excess of those optimal for a fixed-dosage mycophenolate regimen. Combined with experiences of MPA monitoring in other transplant indications, the data have been rationalized to define circumstances in which measurement of MPA concentrations can contribute to improved management of mycophenolate therapy in nonrenal transplant recipients.

Management of renal dysfunction in the liver transplant recipient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute and chronic kidney injury following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. With the increasing longevity of liver transplant recipients, chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become an increasingly prevalent complication among long-term survivors. This article provides an overview of the literature on suggested risk factors for acute and CKD following OLT and a discussion of an approach to their medical management.

RECENT FINDINGS

In OLT candidates with pretransplant renal dysfunction, the use of interleukin-2 receptor blockers or antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in conjunction with delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors may preserve early renal function. In long-term stable OLT recipients with established calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, calcineurin inhibitor minimization or withdrawal protocols may halt or ameliorate renal dysfunction without compromising patient and graft survival. However, large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials are still needed.

SUMMARY

The occurrence of acute kidney injury is common immediately after OLT, whereas the incidence of CKD and end-stage renal disease increases with time. Identifying patients at risk for acute kidney injury and CKD following OLT and early implementation of measures to preserve, halt, or ameliorate the progression of renal dysfunction should be an integral part in the management of OLT recipients.