Peripheral Blood Regulatory T Cells in Long-Term Kidney Transplant Recipients

Future prospects for CD8+ regulatory T cells in immune tolerance

CD8⁺ Tregs have been long described and significant progresses have been made about their phenotype, their functional mechanisms, and their suppressive ability compared to conventional CD4⁺ Tregs. They are now at the dawn of their clinical use. In this review, we will summarize their phenotypic characteristics, their mechanisms of action, the similarities, differences and synergies between CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ Tregs, and we will discuss the biology, development and induction of CD8⁺ Tregs, their manufacturing for clinical use, considering open questions/uncertainties and future technically accessible improvements notably through genetic modifications.

Different regulatory and cytotoxic CD4+ T lymphocyte profiles in renal transplants with antibody-mediated chronic rejection or long-term good graft function

Comparative analysis of the different subsets of CD4(+) T-lymphocytes may provide hints on the immunologic mechanisms operating in the long-term fate of a kidney transplant. We analyzed peripheral regulatory CD4(+) T cells (Tregs) and CD4(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in antibody-mediated chronic rejection (AMCR), in middle-term kidney transplants (2-4 years, MTKT) with good graft function and rejection-free history, in long-term kidney transplants (>15 years, LTKT) and in normal healthy subjects (NHS). Transplant groups with good prognosis (MTKT and LTKT) displayed a significant lower amount of CD4(+)CD25(high) T lymphocytes than NHS, with a trend of a higher percentage in AMCR than in MTKT and LTKT. However, CD4(+)CD25(high) Foxp3(+) cells were significantly higher in LTKT and MTKT than AMCR. Characterization of CD4(+)CD25(high) T cells showed a marked increase of intracellular CTLA-4 in the AMCR group in respect to the other transplant groups, while the expression of the surface molecule seemed to follow a reverse trend. In addition, CD27, a costimulatory receptor involved in long-term T cell survival and prevention of immune tolerance, is significantly reduced in CD4(+)CD25(high) and CD4(+)Foxp3(+) T cells in the LTKT in respect to the other transplant groups. CD4(+)CD25(high)CD45RO(+) and CD4(+)Foxp3(+)CD45RO(+) regulatory T cells with memory function were increased in LTKT compared to NHS and for the latter also in AMCR group. Finally, CD4(+)CTLs that were quantified on the basis of granzyme A expression, were more represented in AMCR patients in comparison to the other groups. Strikingly, CD27 in the CD4(+)CTLs was suppressed in LTKT and MTKT and markedly expressed in AMCR group. No significant differences in the expression of CD28 were observed among different groups. In conclusion, different profiles of Tregs and CD4(+)CTL populations correlate with different long-term conditions of kidney-transplanted patients, suggesting their role in the development of immunologic events in kidney transplantation.

Absolute of CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) regulatory T-cell count rather than its ratio in peripheral blood is related to long-term survival of renal allografts

CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) may reflect the immune status of kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. Since individual KTx recipients show different lymphocyte counts, we hypothesized that the Treg absolute count rather than its peripheral ratio was more related to long-term survival. We enrolled 42 patients with more than 5-year KTx survival: 32 patients with stable graft function and 10 suffering chronic rejection (CR group). The stable group was divided into four subgroups according to graft survival time: subgroups A (5-6 years); B (6-7 years); C (7-8 years); and D (>8 years). Healthy volunteers were enrolled as controls. We compared the peripheral ratio and absolute count of CD4(+), CD4(+)CD25(+), and CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs. Treg peripheral ratio was not significantly different among the three groups. However, the Treg absolute count was higher among the stable than the CR group (P < .01). Meanwhile, both Treg ratios and absolute counts were altered with renal graft survival. Treg absolute count in subgroups B and C were not only higher than that in subgroup A (P < .05), but also was significantly higher than that in the CR control group or (P < .05). Interestingly, both the Treg ratio and absolute count in subgroup D were lower than those in subgroups B and C (P < .05). Treg quantitation, which alters with graft survival time, may contribute to long-term acceptance of renal allografts. Compared to Treg peripheral ratio, the absolute count may be a superior index to estimate KTx recipient immune status.

Islet transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients using calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive protocols based on T-cell adhesion or costimulation blockade

BACKGROUND

The applicability of islet transplantation as treatment for type 1 diabetes is limited by long-term graft dysfunction, immunosuppressive drug toxicity, need for multiple donors, and increased risk of allosensitization. We describe two immunosuppressive regimens based on the costimulation blocker belatacept (BELA) or the antileukocyte functional antigen-1 antibody efalizumab (EFA), which permit long-term islet allograft survival and address some of these concerns.

METHODS

Ten patients with type 1 diabetes with hypoglycemic unawareness received intraportal allogeneic islet transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin induction and maintenance with sirolimus or mycophenolate and BELA (n=5) or EFA (n=5).

RESULTS

All five BELA-treated patients achieved independence after single transplants; one resumed partial insulin use 305 days after transplant but is now independent after a second transplant. All five patients treated with EFA achieved independence after one (3/5) or two (2/5) islet transplants and remained independent while on EFA (392-804 days). After EFA was discontinued because of withdrawal of the drug from the market, two patients resumed intermittent insulin use; the others remain independent. No patient in either group developed significant side effects related to the study drugs, and none have been sensitized to alloantigens. All have stable renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

These two novel immunosuppressive regimens are effective, well tolerated, and the first calcineurin inhibitor/steroid-sparing islet protocols resulting in long-term insulin independence. Although EFA is no longer available for clinical use, these early results demonstrate that a regimen using BELA may be an effective alternative to improve graft function and longevity while minimizing renal and β-cell toxicity.

Islet transplantation in type 1 diabetics using an immunosuppressive protocol based on the anti-LFA-1 antibody efalizumab

The applicability of islet transplantation as treatment for type 1 diabetes is limited by renal and islet toxicities of currently available immunosuppressants. We describe a novel immunosuppressive regimen using the antileukocyte functional antigen-1 antibody efalizumab which permits long-term islet allograft survival while reducing the need for corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). Eight patients with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemic unawareness received intraportal allogeneic islet transplants. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin induction followed by maintenance with efalizumab and sirolimus or mycophenolate. When efalizumab was withdrawn from the market in mid 2009, all patients were transitioned to regimens consisting of mycophenolate and sirolimus or mycophenolate and tacrolimus. All patients achieved insulin independence and four out of eight patients became independent after single-islet transplants. Insulin independent patients had no further hypoglycemic events, hemoglobin A1c levels decreased and renal function remained stable. Efalizumab was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were encountered. Although long-term follow-up is limited by discontinuation of efalizumab and transition to conventional imunnosuppression (including CNI in four cases), these results demonstrate that insulin independence after islet transplantation can be achieved with a CNI and steroid-free regimen. Such an approach may minimize renal and islet toxicity and thus further improve long-term islet allograft survival.