Complete switch to everolimus in long-term kidney transplants: evolution of the renal function

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies

Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and reduces the risk of mortality. A majority of the success of kidney transplantation is attributable to the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), cyclosporine and tacrolimus, and their ability to reduce acute rejection rates. However, long-term graft survival rates have not improved over time, and although controversial, evidence does suggest a role of chronic CNI toxicity in this failure to improve outcomes. Consequently, there is interest in reducing or removing CNIs from immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to improve outcomes. Several strategies exist to spare calcineurin inhibitors, including use of agents such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), sirolimus, everolimus or belatacept to facilitate late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal, beyond 6 mo post-transplant; or using these agents to plan early withdrawal within 6 mo; or to avoid the CNIs all together using CNI-free regimens. Although numerous reviews have been written on this topic, practice varies significantly between centers. This review organizes the data based on patient characteristics (i.e., the baseline immunosuppressive regimen) as a means to aid the practicing clinician in caring for their patients, by matching up their situation with the relevant literature. The current review, the first in a series of two, examines the potential of immunosuppressive agents to facilitate late CNI withdrawal beyond 6 mo post-transplant, and has demonstrated that the strongest evidence resides with MMF/MPS. MMF or MPS can be successfully introduced/maintained to facilitate late CNI withdrawal and improve renal function in the setting of graft deterioration, albeit with an increased risk of acute rejection and infection. Additional benefits may include improved blood pressure, lipid profile and serum glucose. Sirolimus has less data directly comparing CNI withdrawal to an active CNI-containing regimen, but modest improvement in short-term renal function is possible, with an increased risk of proteinuria, especially in the setting of baseline renal dysfunction and/or proteinuria. Renal outcomes may be improved when sirolimus is used in combination with MMF. Although data with everolimus is less robust, results appear similar to those observed with sirolimus.

Conversion to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients: to believe or not believe?

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in renal transplantation is associated with chronic graft dysfunction, increased cardiovascular risk, and malignancies. Everolimus (EVR) appears to permit a CNI-sparing regimen among stable kidney recipients.

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of conversion from CNI to EVR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective registry-based study of all kidney transplant recipients converted from CNI to EVR between 2006 and 2010. One hundred fifty-one patients, including 69.5% males and with an overall mean age of 50.2 ± 12.7 years, underwent conversion to EVR at 37.0 ± 49.8 (16) months after transplantation with 33.7% during the first 6 months. Reasons for conversion included: CNI nephrotoxicity prevention (54.3%), chronic graft dysfunction (25.8%), malignant tumors (10.6%), CNI-adverse reactions (6.6%), and biopsy-proven CNI nephrotoxicity (2.6%). During a follow-up of 17.9 ± 9.9 months (range, 6-58.5), 18 patients (11.9%) were reconverted to CNI, 2 died with functioning grafts, and 2 lost kidney function.

RESULTS

We observed a significant (P < .001) increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate-Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFR-MDRD) by 11.3% within 6 months: 56.7 ± 22.1 to 64.1 ± 23.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2). At final evaluation it was 13.7%, namely, to 65.5 ± 23.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2). At the end of follow-up the proportion of patients with >300 mg/d proteinuria increased from 7.9% to 23.3% (P = .001). Dyslipidemia prevalence increased from 69.5% to 77.5% (P = not significant [NS]) and arterial hypertension increased from 49% to 65.9% (P < .001) at the end of follow-up. Other reported side effects included oral ulcers (2.6%), edema (5.3%), interstitial pneumonitis (1.3%), and toxic hepatitis (1.3%), some of them leading to EVR discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

In our population, renal function improved significantly after conversion from CNI to EVR. Although side effects were common, most were mild, withdrawal of EVR was necessary in a low percentage of cases. EVR appears to be an effective, safe alternative to CNI for maintenance therapy in selected kidney transplant recipients.