Foxp3 staining in BK virus allograft nephropathy and comparison with acute cellular rejection

BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant recipients

BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) occurs in up to 10% of renal transplant recipients and can result in graft loss. The reactivation of BK virus in renal transplant recipients is largely asymptomatic, and routine surveillance especially in the first 12-24 months after transplant is necessary for early recognition and intervention. Reduced immunosuppression and anti-viral treatment in the early stages may be effective in stopping BK virus replication. Urinary decoy cells, although highly specific, lack sensitivity to diagnose BKVN. Transplant biopsy remains the gold standard to diagnose BKVN, good surrogate markers for surveillance using quantitative urinary decoy cells, urinary SV40 T immunochemical staining or polyoma virus-Haufen bodies are offered by recent studies. Advanced BKVN results in severe tubulo-interstitial damage and graft failure. Retransplantation after BKVN is associated with good outcomes. Newer treatment modalities are emerging.

BK nephropathy in the native kidneys of patients with organ transplants: Clinical spectrum of BK infection

Nephropathy secondary to BK virus, a member of the Papoviridae family of viruses, has been recognized for some time as an important cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. In recent times, BK nephropathy (BKN) of the native kidneys has being increasingly recognized as a cause of chronic kidney disease in patients with solid organ transplants, bone marrow transplants and in patients with other clinical entities associated with immunosuppression. In such patients renal dysfunction is often attributed to other factors including nephrotoxicity of medications used to prevent rejection of the transplanted organs. Renal biopsy is required for the diagnosis of BKN. Quantitation of the BK viral load in blood and urine are surrogate diagnostic methods. The treatment of BKN is based on reduction of the immunosuppressive medications. Several compounds have shown antiviral activity, but have not consistently shown to have beneficial effects in BKN. In addition to BKN, BK viral infection can cause severe urinary bladder cystitis, ureteritis and urinary tract obstruction as well as manifestations in other organ systems including the central nervous system, the respiratory system, the gastrointestinal system and the hematopoietic system. BK viral infection has also been implicated in tumorigenesis. The spectrum of clinical manifestations from BK infection and infection from other members of the Papoviridae family is widening. Prevention and treatment of BK infection and infections from other Papovaviruses are subjects of intense research.

Current problems in screening, diagnosis and treatment of polyomavirus BK nephropathy

Polyomavirus BK nephropathy (BKVN) is an important infectious complication in kidney transplantation. Since graft survival in patients with BKVN is poor, current clinical practice focuses on screening for viral replication, and pre-emptive reduction of immunosuppression in viraemic patients. Urinary cytology, nucleic acid testing of urine and/or plasma, and viral-specific staining of biopsy specimens are necessary for diagnosis. Infected tubular cells show intranuclear inclusions, lysis or necrosis, and shedding into the tubular lumen. But such light microscopy findings are quite focally observed in many cases, and varying degrees of tubulointerstitial inflammation mimicking T-cell-mediated acute rejection make accurate diagnosis difficult. There is a histological classification of BKVN originally reported by the University of Maryland in 2001, and modified by American Society of Transplantation Infectious Disease Community of Practice, which focuses on interstitial inflammation and fibrosis. Another classification was proposed by the Banff Working Group in 2009 (Banff Working Proposal), which focuses on acute tubular injury instead of interstitial inflammation. The usefulness of the Banff Working Proposal is now under consideration with a multicenter study being conducted, but it has not yet reached a clear conclusion. In this review, the current screening strategies for the replication of BK virus, difficulties with diagnosis, histopathological classifications, treatments, and prognostic factors of BKVN are discussed.

Predominance of TH2 cells and plasma cells in polyoma virus nephropathy: a role for humoral immunity?

The differential diagnosis of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and BK-virus nephropathy (BKVN) in renal transplant biopsies is notoriously difficult. Therefore, attempts were made to differentiate between the two by characterizing the immune cell infiltrate. Using immunohistochemistry, the distribution of immune cell (sub)populations such as CD4(+) T helper (TH), TH1, TH2, CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells, regulatory T cells, B cells, plasma cells and follicular dendritic cells was determined in a total of 38 renal biopsy specimens. In addition, the expression of the HLA class I antigen presentation machinery (APM) components was investigated. In general, the frequency of T cells was higher than B cells, and TH cells outnumbered cytotoxic T cells with a predominance of TH2 over TH1 cells. In BKVN, a significantly higher number of plasma cells was observed (P = .028), and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy was more pronounced in BKVN (P = .007) compared to TCMR. The expression of components of the HLA class I APM was not affected by the infection with BK virus compared to TCMR. These findings indicate a TH2 shift in renal transplants in the context of alloreactive and virus-induced inflammation maybe as a consequence of immunosuppression, which usually targets T cell reaction. The predominance of plasma cells might underline an important role of humoral immunity in BKVN. Moreover, BK virus does not seem to modulate the expression of HLA class I APM as a strategy of immune evasion.