Improving the waiting list by using 75-year-old donors for recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Orthotopic Liver Transplantation With Elderly Donors (Over 80 Years of Age): A Prospective Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Our main objective was to assess the clinical outcomes obtained in a single orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) hospital with donors ≥80 years of age compared to a control group of patients subjected to OLT during the same period of time with donors who were under 65 years of age.

METHODS

A prospective analysis was carried out on all the OLTs performed using liver grafts from donors in a state of brain death and with an age of ≥80 years (study group) between April 2007 and January 2015. The results of the study group (n = 36) were compared with those of a control group of patients less than 65 years of age receiving transplants with grafts.

RESULTS

A total of 51 potential donors ≥80 years were assessed, with a total of 36 liver transplants being carried out and their results were compared with a control group of 283 patients receiving transplants. The median follow-up time of the patients in the series was 36 months (range: 24-120 months). Graft survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 77%, 72%, and 62%, respectively, among the patients in the study group and 79%, 73%, and 65% among the patients in the control group, and there were no statistically significant differences. Patient survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 86%, 82%, and 75%, respectively, among the patients in the study group and 82%, 76%, and 72% among the patients in the control group, also without there being any statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no age limit for liver transplant donors. The use of octogenarian donors makes it possible to increase the pool of donors while providing enough safety for the recipient.

Do Older Liver Grafts Have Worse Survival? The Niguarda Experience

BACKGROUND

Elderly donor livers are thought to be marginal graft. In the present study, we aimed to identify an age threshold to consider a graft as elderly to identify the trend (if any) of the donor age in our series and to identify an efficient allocation criteria for elderly grafts.

METHODS

We reviewed in a retrospective manner our series of 1520 liver transplants, comparing graft survival under and over a certain age. On the basis of the results of this analysis, we identified a threshold of 70 years to define a graft as old. The donor age trend analysis showed an increasing rate of transplants from elderly donors.

RESULTS

To identify efficient allocation criteria for elderly graft, we stratified the series by the disease of the recipient: 556 patients underwent transplants for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC+ group) and 964 for other diseases (HCC- group). Two hundred twenty-one patients of 556 of the HCC+ group were hepatitis c virus (HCV) negative (HCC+/HCV- group), and 312 of 964 of the HCC- group were HCV positive (HCC-/HCV+). The survival analysis showed no significant differences in comparing the outcome for elderly and young grafts in the HCC+ (P = .135) and HCC- (P = .055) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing the survival of old and young livers in the HCC+/HCV- group, the elderly livers appear to have a better outcome (P = .05); on the other hand, the same analysis in the HCC-/HCV+ group shows a worse outcome for old-aged grafts (P = .026). Therefore, the present study suggests that elderly livers should be allocated to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and should be avoided in HCV+ recipients.

Transplantation With Livers From Deceased Donors Older Than 75 Years

BACKGROUND

The availability of donor organs limits the number of patients in need who are offered liver transplantation. Measures to expand the donor pool are crucial to prevent on-list mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of livers from deceased donors who were older than 75 years.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients who received a first liver transplant (D75 group) from 2001 to 2011 were included. Donor and recipient data were collected from the Nordic Liver Transplant Registry and medical records. The outcome was compared with a control group of 54 patients who received a liver graft from donors aged 20 to 49 years (D20-49 group). Median donor age was 77 years (range, 75-86 years) in the D75 group and 41 years (range, 20-49 years) in the D20-49 group. Median recipient age was 59 years (range, 31-73 years) in the D75 group and 58 years (range, 31-74 years) in the D20-49 group.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient/graft survival values were 87/87%, 81/81%, and 71/67% for the D75 group and 88/87%, 75/73%, and 75/73% for the D20-49 group, respectively. Patient (P = 0.89) and graft (P = 0.79) survival did not differ between groups. The frequency of biliary complications was higher in the D75 group (29.6/13%, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Selected livers from donors over age 75 years should not be excluded based on age, which does not compromise patient or graft survival despite a higher frequency of biliary complications.

Effect of donor age on graft function and long-term survival of recipients undergoing living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Donor shortage is the biggest obstacle in organ transplantation. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been considered as a valuable approach to shortening waiting time. The objectives of this study were to investigate the feasibility of utilizing donors older than 50 years in LDLT and to evaluate the graft function and recipient survival.

METHODS

All LDLT cases (n=159) were divided into the older (donor age≥50 years, n=10) and younger (donor age<50 years, n=149) donor groups. Donor graft and recipient condition pre-, intra- and post-operation were compared between the two groups. In particular, graft functions and recipient survivals were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median donor age was 58.5 (52.5-60.0) years in the older donor group and 25.0 (23.0-32.0) in the younger donor group. There was no significant difference in cold ischemic time, anhepatic phase and operation time between the older and younger donor groups (P>0.05). However, the volume of red blood cell transfused in operation was greater in the older donor group than in the younger donor group (1900 vs 1200 mL, P=0.023). The 1-, 3- and 5-year graft survival rates were 90%, 80% and 80% for the older donor group, and 92%, 87% and 87% for the younger donor group, respectively (P=0.459). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 100%, 90% and 90% for recipients with older grafts, and 93%, 87% and 87% for those with younger grafts, respectively (P=0.811).

CONCLUSION

It is safe for a LDLT recipient to receive liver from donors older than 50 years, and there is no significant adverse effect on graft function and long-term patients' survival.

Matching donor to recipient in liver transplantation: Relevance in clinical practice

Achieving optimum outcomes after liver transplantation requires an understanding of the interaction between donor, graft and recipient factors. Within the cohort of patients waiting for a transplant, better matching of the donor organ to the recipient will improve transplant outcomes and benefit the overall waiting list by minimizing graft failure and need for re-transplantation. A PubMed search was conducted to identify published literature investigating the effects of donor factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, viral serology; graft factors such as size and quality, recipient factors such as age, size, gender and transplant factors such as major or minor blood group incompatibility and immunological factors. We also report technical and therapeutic modifications that can be used to manage donor-recipient mismatch identified from literature and the authors’ clinical experience. Multiple donor and recipient factors impact graft survival after liver transplantation. Appropriate matching based on donor-organ-recipient variables, modification of surgical technique and innovative peri-transplant strategies can increase the donor pool by utilizing grafts from marginal donors that are traditionally turned down.

Value of 18-FDG-positron emission tomography/computed tomography before and after transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantation: initial results

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for various types of end-stage liver disease and the most appropriate alternative for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-associated liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to describe our initial experience with the use of 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography CT before and after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC patients undergoing liver transplantation, seeking to predict the percentage of tumor necrosis achieved by TACE procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2007 through December 2009, 39 patients with HCC and liver cirrhosis were included in our liver transplantation program. We selected the 6 subjects who underwent 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (18-FDG PET/CT) pre- and post-TACE.

RESULTS

The median SUV (standardized uptake value) in the lesions studied were 4 (range, 2.79-6.95) before TACE with a median post-TACE SUV of 0 (range, 0-4). Among patients whose post-TACE SUV decreased to <3, the percentage of necrosis after studying the hepatectomy was >80%.

CONCLUSION

Performance of an 18-FDG PET/CT before and after TACE and comparison of SUV in patients with HCC awaiting liver transplantation provided valuable information regarding the effectiveness of TACE.

Extended donors in liver transplantation

Several criteria are used to differentiate between standard and extended allograft donors. These criteria include deceased after cardiac death, advanced donor age, steatosis, previous malignancy in the donor, hepatitis C virus-positive allografts, human T-cell lymphotropic virus-positive allografts, active infections in the donor, high-risk donors, split liver transplantations, and living donor liver transplantations. Review of the literature can lead each practitioner to incorporate extended criteria donors into their transplant program, thereby individualizing the use of these allografts, increasing the donor pool, and decreasing overall waitlist mortality.

Results of liver transplantation from donors over 75 years: case control study

INTRODUCTION

The use of elderly donors can increase the pool of organs available for transplant. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of grafts from donors older than 75 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We selected 29 patients transplanted from January 2003 to January 2010 with livers from donors older than 75 years for comparison with a control group (58 patients), selected among patients transplanted immediately before or after each study case. Data analyzed using SPSS 15.0 were considered statistically significant at P < .05.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were evident in the mean age of donors (78.3 ± 2.9 vs 50.4 ± 17.8 years, P < .001), levels of aspartate aminotransferase alanine aminotransferase (30.8 ± 18.13/24.9 ± 14.4 vs 53.81 ± 68.4/39.37 ± 39.94 U/L, P < .05), and waiting list time of (122.4 ± 94.3 vs 169.2 ± 135.5 days, P = .034) of elderly donor versus control graft cohorts. The median follow-up was 32 months (range: 4-88.0) No differences were observed at 1 and 3 years after transplantation: graft survival was 78% and 61% in the older donor group and 83% and 71% in the younger donor group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of expanded donors from elderly subjects can increase the donor pool with good results.

Transhepatic portal venous angioplasty with stenting for bleeding jejunal angiodysplasias in a retrasplant patient: a case report

A 41-year-old man, who had undergone liver retransplantation, was admitted to our institution complaining of rectorraghia. Gastroscopy and colonoscopy failed to detect the source of bleeding. Computed tomographic angiography detected a stenosis at the portal anastomosis. Capsule endoscopy showed the presence of multiple small bowel angiodysplasias. After a surgical failure, direct portography revealed severe stenosis of the extrahepatic portal vein. Subsequent to percutaneous transhepatic portography, we dilated the stenosis using a balloon catheter and placed an expandable metallic stent, stopping the bleeding without further episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding.