Influence of mycophenolate mofetil on preservation of kidney function in liver transplant patients

Pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in organ transplant recipients: an update

This review aims to provide an update of the literature on the pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients. Mycophenolate is now the antimetabolite of choice in immunosuppressant regimens in transplant recipients. The active drug moiety mycophenolic acid (MPA) is available as an ester pro-drug and an enteric-coated sodium salt. MPA is a competitive, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), an important rate-limiting enzyme in purine synthesis. MPA suppresses T and B lymphocyte proliferation; it also decreases expression of glycoproteins and adhesion molecules responsible for recruiting monocytes and lymphocytes to sites of inflammation and graft rejection; and may destroy activated lymphocytes by induction of a necrotic signal. Improved long-term allograft survival has been demonstrated for MPA and may be due to inhibition of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 or fibroblast proliferation. Recent research also suggested a differential effect of mycophenolate on the regulatory T cell/helper T cell balance which could potentially encourage immune tolerance. Lower exposure to calcineurin inhibitors (renal sparing) appears to be possible with concomitant use of MPA in renal transplant recipients without undue risk of rejection. MPA displays large between- and within-subject pharmacokinetic variability. At least three studies have now reported that MPA exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with bioavailability decreasing significantly with increasing doses, perhaps due to saturable absorption processes or saturable enterohepatic recirculation. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is still controversial and the ability of routine MPA TDM to improve long-term graft survival and patient outcomes is largely unknown. MPA monitoring may be more important in high-immunological recipients, those on calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens and in whom unexpected rejection or infections have occurred. The majority of pharmacodynamic data on MPA has been obtained in patients receiving MMF therapy in the first year after kidney transplantation. Low MPA area under the concentration time from 0 to 12 h post-dose (AUC0-12) is associated with increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection although AUC0-12 optimal cut-off values vary across study populations. IMPDH monitoring to identify individuals at increased risk of rejection shows some promise but is still in the experimental stage. A relationship between MPA exposure and adverse events was identified in some but not all studies. Genetic variants within genes involved in MPA metabolism (UGT1A9, UGT1A8, UGT2B7), cellular transportation (SLCOB1, SLCO1B3, ABCC2) and targets (IMPDH) have been reported to effect MPA pharmacokinetics and/or response in some studies; however, larger studies across different ethnic groups that take into account genetic linkage and drug interactions that can alter a patient's phenotype are needed before any clinical recommendations based on patient genotype can be formulated. There is little data on the pharmacology and toxicology of MPA in older and paediatric transplant recipients.

Immunosuppressants: what's new?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in surgical techniques and combinations of conventional immunosuppressants have made paediatric liver transplantation the success story it is today. However, the increasing numbers of survivors reaching adulthood highlight important issues of long-term quality of life and drug induced complications. The aim of this review is to describe the trends and advances in immunosuppression for paediatric liver transplantation over the last 12 months.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

As our knowledge of the immune cell populations and intracellular mechanisms involved in alloreactivity improves, induction immunosuppression has emerged as a powerful therapeutic manoeuvre to counter the initial alloimmune response. Many centres have adopted a more focused use of biological agents at induction to improve immunosuppression in the critical peritransplant period and to reduce the level of subsequent maintenance requirements. Corticosteroid avoidance and calcineurin inhibitors minimization trials have obtained encouraging results. New immunosuppressive strategies have evolved towards the goal of inducing operational tolerance, and paediatric liver transplant recipients seem to be a particularly promising target. New strategies are being developed also to improve quality of life and reduce nonadherence in adolescents and young adults who underwent liver transplantation. New drugs target B-cell and complement driven rejection and new monoclonal antibodies and small molecules are under trial to inhibit specific signals in the immune response.

SUMMARY

We review current trends of immunosuppressive protocols in paediatric liver transplantation, focusing on induction agents, corticosteroid avoidance and calcineurin inhibitor sparing protocols, protocols for adult transition and new drugs currently under development.