Liver Transplant Quality and Safety Plan in Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine

Safe surgery checklist: content validation proposal for liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

to develop the safe surgery checklist for liver transplantation according to the original model of the World Health Organization and perform content validation.

METHODS

a methodological research developed in four stages: integrative review; expert participation; consensus among researchers; and content validation using the Delphi technique in two rounds, by five judges. For data analysis, the Content Validation Index was used.

RESULTS

the first version of the checklist consisted of four surgical moments with 64 items of verification, with an average Content Validation Index of 0.80. After adjustments, in the second round the checklist maintained four surgical moments with 76 items and a Content Validation Index of 0.87.

CONCLUSIONS

the checklist was validated and adequate for the safety of liver transplantation in the surgical environment, given that each item established must be mapped and managed for the success and effectiveness of the procedure.

Key Points in Establishing a Model of Mouse Liver Transplantation

The explosion of interest in research into the mouse genome and immune system has meant that the mouse orthotopic liver transplantation (MOLT) model has become a popular means of studying transplantation immunity, organ preservation, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and surgical techniques, among others. Although numerous modifications and refinements of surgical techniques have simplified the operation, the relatively short duration of postoperative survival after MOLT remains an obstacle to longer-term follow-up studies. Here, we summarize the scientific basis of MOLT and our experience improving and refining the model in six key areas: anesthesia, operative technique, perfusion and preservation of the liver, cuff technique, anhepatic time, and the value of rearterialization for the liver graft. We also compare the characteristics of different surgical techniques, and give recommendations for the best means of tailoring technique to the objectives of a study. In doing so, we aim to assist other investigators in establishing and perfecting the MOLT model in their routine research practice.

Pain control after liver transplantation surgery

BACKGROUND

Although post-liver transplantation pain is not as severe as expected from the size of the surgical incision, optimal pain control becomes crucial to aid compliance with the ventilator, improve respiratory function, and facilitate an early weaning from mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

Because the majority of analgesics are primarily metabolized and excreted by the hepatobiliary system, a poor recovery of graft function will result in a decrease in clearance and reduced elimination of the drug. On the other hand, if the liver is working well, the metabolism of analgesics improves significantly with minimal accumulation. Morphine-based analgesia has been associated with a higher risk of sedation and respiratory depression compared with major abdominal surgical procedures. Fentanyl and sufentanil in continuous intravenous infusion may be preferred in the presence of hemodynamic instability or bronchospasm. Sufentanil produces shorter-lasting respiratory depression and long-lasting analgesia than does fentanyl.

RESULTS

The provision of potent continuous analgesia, independent of the duration of infusion, and the unique pharmacokinetics, not significantly affected by the functional status of the graft, make remifentanil appropriate for the majority of liver-transplanted patients. Unlike for patients with very severe pain after major abdominal surgery, liver transplant recipients usually benefit from tramadol, either in repeated intravenous boluses or continuous intravenous infusion. Paracetamol has been included as adjuvant (or sole agent, rarely) in the analgesic treatment of mild to moderate postoperative pain. The combination treatment (paracetamol plus tramadol) is a reasonable, safe option with improved analgesia and concurrent reduction in the incidence of some opioid-related side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequent review of the patient's response is mandatory when potent opioids are used because dose-dependent respiratory depression is a serious and potentially life-threatening adverse effect. The benefits provided by epidural analgesia in this particular setting should be weighed against the risks because in the presence of markedly deranged perioperative blood clotting, the development of epidural hematoma represents a disastrous complication.

A meta-analysis of complications following deceased donor liver transplant

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is a complex surgery associated with high rates of postoperative complications. While national outcomes data are available, national rates of most complications are unknown.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of the literature reporting rates of postoperative complications between 2002 and 2012 was performed. A cohort of 29,227 deceased donor liver transplant recipients from 74 studies was used to calculate pooled incidences for 17 major postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first comprehensive review of postoperative complications after liver transplantation and can serve as a guide for transplant and nontransplant clinicians. Efforts to collect national data on complications, such as through the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, would improve the ability to provide patients with informed consent, serve as a tool for individual center performance monitoring, and provide a central source against which to measure interventions aimed at improving patient care.

Clinical practice of early extubation after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Anesthetic practices such as early tracheal extubation facilitate postoperative recovery. Early extubation after liver transplantation has been adopted by some centers in the recent two decades. No universal clinical guidelines are used and questions remain. This review aimed to address the current status of early extubation after liver transplantation.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of MEDLINE and ISI Web of Knowledge databases was performed using terms such as liver transplantation, early extubation, immediate tracheal extubation, fast tracking or fast track anesthesia and postoperative tracheal extubation. Additional papers were identified by a manual search of the references in the key articles.

RESULTS

Review of the available literature provided an insight into the definition, evolution, advantages and risks of early extubation, and anesthetic techniques that prompt early extubation in liver transplant patients. Early extubation has proved to be feasible and safe in these patients, but the outcomes are still uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

Early extubation after liver transplantation is feasible, safe and cost-effective in the majority of patients and has been increasingly accepted as an option for conventional postoperative ventilation. Comprehensive and individualized evaluation of the patient's condition before extubation by an experienced anesthesiologist is the cornerstone of success. Understanding of its effect on the outcome remains incomplete. In the future, additional trials are required to establish universal early extubation guidelines and to determine its benefits for patients and practitioners.