Cardiovascular Events After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring as a Useful Tool in the Cardiological Assessment of Pancreas Transplant Recipients with Type 1 Diabetes

Having the appropriate tools to identify pancreas recipients most susceptible to coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial for pretransplant cardiological assessment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between blood pressure (BP) indices provided by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and the prevalence of CAD in pancreas transplant candidates with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This prospective cross-sectional study included adult T1D patients referred for pretransplant cardiological assessment in our center. The study population included 86 participants with a median age of 40 (35-46) years. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, after adjusting for potential confounding factors, higher 24 h BP (systolic BP/diastolic BP/pulse pressure) (OR  =  1.063, 95% CI 1.023-1.105, p = 0.002/OR = 1.075, 95% CI 1.003-1.153, p = 0.042/OR = 1.091, 95 CI 1.037-1.147, p = 0.001, respectively) and higher daytime BP (systolic BP/diastolic BP/pulse pressure) (OR  =  1.069, 95% CI 1.027-1.113, p = 0.001/OR = 1.077, 95% CI 1.002-1.157, p = 0.043/OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.051-1.172, p = 0.0002, respectively) were independently and significantly associated with the prevalence of CAD. Daytime pulse pressure was the strongest indicator of the prevalence of CAD among all analyzed ABPM parameters. ABPM can be used as a valuable tool to identify pancreas recipients who are most susceptible to CAD. We suggest the inclusion of ABPM in pretransplant cardiac screening in type 1 diabetes patients eligible for pancreas transplantation.

The burden of coronary heart disease in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: coronary angiography as a diagnostic method for all? - a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease, which is frequently asymptomatic. This risk increases significantly in those with nephropathy. In selected patients, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is the renal and pancreatic replacement therapy of choice, as it increases longevity and stabilizes diabetic complications. Despite essential, universal screening protocols are still controversial for coronary artery disease in this population.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 99 simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients from our centre from 2011 to 2018 and selected 77 patients who underwent coronary angiography during the pre-transplant evaluation. Our aim was to identify potential risk factors associated with significant lesions on coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Almost half of our cohort of 77 candidates submitted to coronary angiography had coronary artery disease. Of these, nearly 30% underwent revascularization, although only one of them reported symptoms of myocardial ischemia. In a univariate analysis, the presence of smoking habits was the only risk factor for coronary artery disease. We also found that 20 or more years of type 1 diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with the presence of coronaropathy.

DISCUSSION

Selection of diabetic candidates with acceptable cardiac risk before simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is imperative. Given the impact of a correct diagnosis and a low procedural risk, we defend the routine use of coronary angiography as the initial screening method for coronary artery disease in this population. Particularly care must be taken in evaluating asymptomatic patients with long-term type 1 diabetes mellitus and smokers.

Working towards an ERAS Protocol for Pancreatic Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) initially started in the early 2000s as a series of protocols to improve the perioperative care of surgical patients. They aimed to increase patient satisfaction while reducing postoperative complications and postoperative length of stay. Despite these protocols being widely adopted in many fields of surgery, they are yet to be adopted in pancreatic transplantation: a high-risk surgery with often prolonged length of postoperative stay and high rate of complications. We have analysed the literature in pancreatic and transplantation surgery to identify the necessary preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative components of an ERAS pathway in pancreas transplantation.

Assessing Pancreas Transplant Candidate Cardiac Disease: Preoperative Protocol Development at a Rapidly Growing Transplant Program

Pancreas transplant rates, despite improving outcomes, have decreased over the past two decades. This is due, in part, to ageing, increasingly co-morbid pancreas transplant candidates. There is a paucity of published data regarding coronary artery disease (CAD) in this population. To inform peri-operative management strategies, we sought to understand the frequency of CAD among recipients of pancreas transplants at our center. Informed by these data, we sought to develop a standard protocol for evaluation. A retrospective review of pancreas transplants (solitary pancreas and simultaneous pancreas-kidney) was undertaken at the University of Maryland. Transplant outcomes and frequency of cardiac disease were analyzed. Current data were compared with historic controls. Over the study period, 59 patients underwent pancreas transplantation. Coronary architecture was assessed in 38 patients (64.4%). Discrete evidence of CAD was present in 28 of 39 patients (71.7%). All pancreas candidates (n = 21) who underwent left heart catheterization (LHC) demonstrated CAD (100%). No patients experienced myocardial infarction (MI) and no deaths resulted from cardiac disease in the early post-transplant period. Pancreas transplant candidates are at high risk for CAD. At a center in which pancreas transplant rates are increasing, a rigorous cardiac work up revealed that 71.7% of assessed recipients had CAD. Although asymptomatic, 6.8% required coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Despite increasing age and co-morbid status, pancreas transplant recipients can enjoy excellent results if protocolized preoperative testing is used.

Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE

People with type 1 diabetes and kidney failure have an increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKT) improves survival, but the long-term risk for MACE is uncertain.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We assessed the frequency and risk factors for MACE (defined as fatal cardiovascular disease and nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke) and related nonfatal MACE to allograft failure in SPKT recipients with type 1 diabetes who underwent transplantation between 2001 and 2015 in the U.K. In a subgroup, we related a pretransplant cardiovascular risk score to MACE.

RESULTS

During 5 years of follow-up, 133 of 1,699 SPKT recipients (7.8%) experienced a MACE. In covariate-adjusted models, age (hazard ratio 1.04 per year [95% CI 1.01-1.07]), prior myocardial infarction (2.6 [1.3-5.0]), stroke (2.3 [1.2-4.7]), amputation (2.0 [1.02-3.7]), donor history of hypertension (1.8 [1.05-3.2]), and waiting time (1.02 per month [1.0-1.04]) were significant predictors. Nonfatal MACE predicted subsequent allograft failure (renal 1.6 [1.06-2.6]; pancreas 1.7 [1.09-2.6]). In the subgroup, the pretransplant cardiovascular risk score predicted MACE (1.04 per 1% increment [1.02-1.06]).

CONCLUSIONS

We report a high rate of MACE in SPKT recipients. There are a number of variables that predict MACE, while nonfatal MACE increase the risk of subsequent allograft failure. It may be beneficial that organs from hypertensive donors are matched to recipients with lower cardiovascular risk. Pretransplant cardiovascular risk scoring may help to identify patients who would benefit from risk factor optimization or alternative transplant therapies and warrants validation nationally.

Analysis of Hospitalizations in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-center Experience in Poland

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease due to type 1 diabetes mellitus appears to be a regular indication for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKT). Although transplantation improves a patient's health condition, it does not mean that all complications will be eliminated.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 73 patients who underwent SPKT and follow-up between 1988 and 2015 at our institute. The number, duration, and reasons for hospitalization at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years after SPKT were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average number of hospitalizations at 1, 5, 10, 15 years after SPKT were 1.66, 0.39, 0.36, and 0.33, respectively. The main reason for hospitalization over the 15-year period was infections, at 32.4% (SD, 6.8%). Within the first year after SPKT, 6.8% of hospital admissions were caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Over time, the percentage of hospitalizations for cardiovascular complications increased from 0.6% at 1 year to 29% at 12-15 years. Incidence of hospitalization due to cardiovascular complications correlated with a longer period of dialysis and a diagnosis of ischemic heart disease before transplant (r = 0.56, P = .004; r = 0.54, P < .0001, respectively). At 12-15 years after transplantation, 18.2% of hospitalizations were caused by secondary complications of diabetes.

CONCLUSION

The most common reason for hospitalization after SPKT is infectious complications. In the first year posttransplant, there is a high percentage of CMV infections. Hospitalization associated with cardiovascular complications was found to be most common in the latter follow-up period and showed a correlation with longer dialysis period.

Pancreas transplantation in older patients is safe, but patient selection is paramount

Pancreas transplant outcomes have progressively improved. Despite this, some centers have continued to employ historical age limits for pancreas transplant candidates. We sought to determine the importance of chronological age in determining patient and graft survival rates after pancreas transplantation. A single-center, retrospective study of adult, deceased donor simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) and solitary pancreas transplants (SP, including pancreas transplant alone and pancreas after kidney transplants) in recipients ≥ 55 years (55 + ), occurring between July 1, 1999, and June 30, 2012, was performed. Seven-hundred and forty patients underwent pancreas transplantation, of which 28 patients were 55 + . Patient survival was comparable for younger and older pancreas transplant recipients. Both non-death-censored and death-censored pancreatic graft survival rates were similar in younger and in older patients. Patients aged 45-54 and those aged 55 +  had more frequent cardiovascular events than younger pancreas transplant recipients. There was no difference in renal graft survival for SPK patients when compared with diabetic kidney transplant alone recipients aged 55 years and older. Older pancreas transplant recipients had acceptable long-term patient and graft survival rates, although complications may occur. Chronological age alone should not exclude a patient for pancreas transplant candidacy.

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction Predicts Long-Term Outcome in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes are at increased cardiovascular risk. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is the treatment of choice in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy. We assessed coronary flow reserve (CFR) by transthoracic echocardiography as a marker of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in SPKT patients.

METHODS

We studied 48 consecutive SPKT patients (28 male, age at SPKT 54 ± 8 years). Time from transplantation was 8.5 ± 3 years. Follow-up was 4.6 ± 1.8 years. Coronary flow velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery was detected by Doppler echocardiography at rest and during adenosine infusion. CFR was the ratio of hyperemic diastolic flow velocity (DFV) to resting DFV. A CFR ≤ 2 was considered abnormal and a sign of coronary microvascular dysfunction. MACE were cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and heart failure.

RESULTS

CFR was 2.55 ± 0.8. CFR was ≤2 in 13 (27%) patients. CFR was lower in SPKT patients with MACE (2.1 ± 0.7 vs 2.7 ± 0.8, P = .03) and patients with MACE had a higher incidence of CFR ≤ 2 (P = .03). Time from transplantation was shorter in patients with MACE (P < .0001). Patients with CFR ≤ 2 had a lower MACE-free survival (P = .03). CFR ≤ 2 predicted the risk of MACE (P = .007) independently from coronary artery disease and metabolic control. However, this predicted role is lost when adjusted for the time from transplantation, which plays a protective role (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In SPKT, CFR ≤ 2 may be a reliable marker for MACE, independent of coronary artery disease diagnosis. However, this role seems to be reduced over time. This finding suggests a gradual reduction of cardiovascular risk in SPKT patients.

Follow-up of secondary diabetic complications after pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Successful pancreas transplantation restores physiologic glycemic and metabolic control. Its effects on overall patient survival (especially for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation) are clear-cut. We herein review the available literature to define the impact of pancreas transplantation on chronic complications of diabetes mellitus.

RECENT FINDINGS

With longer-term follow-up, wider patient populations, and more accurate investigational tools (clinical and functional tests, noninvasive imaging, histology, and molecular biology), growing data show that successful pancreas transplantation may slow the progression, stabilize, and even favor the regression of secondary complications of diabetes, both microvascular and macrovascular, in a relevant proportion of recipients.

SUMMARY

Patients who are referred for pancreas transplantation usually suffer from advanced chronic complications of diabetes, which have classically been deemed irreversible. A successful pancreas transplantation is often able to slow the progression, stabilize, and even reverse many microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Growing clinical evidence shows that the expected natural history of long-term diabetic complications can be significantly modified by successful pancreas transplantation.