Blood-saving techniques

Optimizing Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in the Perioperative Period for Spine Surgery After Recent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Comprehensive Review, Synthesis, and Catalyst for Protocol Formulation

The increased incidence of spine surgery within the past decade has highlighted the importance of robust perioperative management to improve patient outcomes overall. Coronary artery disease is a common medical comorbidity present in the population of individuals who receive surgery for spinal pathology that is often treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention. Discontinuation of DAPT before surgical intervention is typically indicated; however, contradictory evidence exists in the literature regarding the timing of DAPT use and discontinuation in the perioperative period. We review the most recent cardiac and spine literature on the intricacies of percutaneous coronary intervention and its associated risks in the postoperative period. We further propose protocols for DAPT use after both elective and urgent spine surgery to optimize perioperative care.

Is there an optimal timing of administration of single-dose intravenous tranexamic acid in bilateral total knee arthroplasty? A comparison between preoperative and intraoperative dose

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on the optimum timing of administration of tranexamic acid (TA) in bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to determine whether the timing of administration of single-dose intravenous TA (either given preoperatively or intraoperatively) has a significant effect on blood loss reduction.

METHODS

We compared two cohorts of patients with end-stage arthritis of knees who underwent bilateral TKA and were given single-dose intravenous TA (1 g or 15 mg/kg) at different times during surgery. The retrospective cohort group consisting of 40 patients (preoperative (PO) group) received TA before the skin incision. The prospective cohort consisting of 40 patients (intraoperative (IO) group) received TA 10 min before deflating the tourniquet on the first knee. Primary outcome measures were mean hemoglobin difference, A (between PO and day 1 postoperative hemoglobin), mean hemoglobin difference, B (between PO and lowest postoperative hemoglobin), and rate of allogeneic blood transfusion. Secondary measure was drain blood loss.

RESULTS

Both cohorts were well matched with respect to age, gender, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. The hemoglobin drop in the IO group was significantly lesser than the PO group on the first postoperative day (2 vs. 2.9 g/dL, p < 0.001). Although statistically insignificant, the patients in the IO group received less allogenic transfusion of packed cell units than in the PO group (11/40, 27.5% vs. 14/40, 35% ). Mean hemoglobin difference, B, and secondary drain loss were comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose intravenous TA given before the start of surgery is as effective as a dose given during arthroplasty of the first knee in reducing blood loss in bilateral TKA.

Liver Transplantation without Perioperative Transfusions Single-Center Experience Showing Better Early Outcome and Shorter Hospital Stay

Background. Significant amounts of red blood cells (RBCs) transfusions are associated with poor outcome after liver transplantation (LT). We report our series of LT without perioperative RBC (P-RBC) transfusions to evaluate its influence on early and long-term outcomes following LT. Methods. A consecutive series of LT between 2006 and 2011 was analyzed. P-RBC transfusion was defined as one or more RBC units administrated during or ≤48 hours after LT. We divided the cohort in “No-Transfusion” and “Yes-Transfusion.” Preoperative status, graft quality, and intra- and postoperative variables were compared to assess P-RBC transfusion risk factors and postoperative outcome. Results. LT was performed in 127 patients (“No-Transfusion” = 39 versus “Yes-Transfusion” = 88). While median MELD was significantly higher in Yes-Transfusion (11 versus 21; P = 0.0001) group, platelet count, prothrombin time, and hemoglobin were significantly lower. On multivariate analysis, the unique independent risk factor associated with P-RBC transfusions was preoperative hemoglobin (P < 0.001). Incidence of postoperative bacterial infections (10 versus 27%; P = 0.03), median ICU (2 versus 3 days; P = 0.03), and hospital stay (7.5 versus 9 days; P = 0.01) were negatively influenced by P-RBC transfusions. However, 30-day mortality (10 versus 15%) and one- (86 versus 70%) and 3-year (77 versus 66%) survival were equivalent in both groups. Conclusions. Recipient MELD score was not a predictive factor for P-RBC transfusion. Patients requiring P-RBC transfusions had worse postoperative outcome. Therefore, maximum efforts must be focused on improving hemoglobin levels during waiting list time to prevent using P-RBC in LT recipients.