Sequential transplant of paired kidneys following donation after cardiac death: impact of longer cold ischemia time on the second kidney on graft and patient outcome

Impact of Cold Ischemia Time on Outcomes of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis of a National Registry

Background

Cold ischemia time (CIT) is known to impact kidney graft survival rates. We compare the impact of CIT on graft failure and mortality in circulatory death versus brain death donor kidneys and how it relates to donor age.

Methods

We used the prospective Dutch Organ Transplantation Registry to include 2153 adult recipients of brain death (n = 1266) and circulatory death (n = 887) donor kidneys after static cold storage from transplants performed between 2005 and 2012. CIT was modeled nonlinearly with splines. Associations and interactions between CIT, donor type, donor age, 5-year (death-censored) graft survival, and mortality were evaluated.

Results

The median CIT was 16.2 hours (interquartile range 12.8-20), ranging from 3.4 to 44.7 hours for brain death and 4.7 to 46.6 hours for circulatory death donor kidneys. At >12 hours of CIT, we observed an increased risk of graft failure in kidneys donated after circulatory death versus after brain death. This risk rose significantly at >22 hours of CIT (hazard ratio 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.49; P = 0.043). Kidneys that came from 60-year-old circulatory death donors demonstrated elevated hazard risk at 19 hours of CIT, a shorter timeline than that for kidneys that came from brain death donors of the same age (hazard ratio 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.78; P = 0.045). The additional harmful effects of increased CIT in kidneys from circulatory-death donors were also found for death-censored graft failure but did not affect mortality rates in any significant way.

Conclusions

The findings support the hypothesis that prolonged cold ischemia is more harmful for circulatory death donor kidneys that have already been subjected to a permissible period of warm ischemia. Efforts should be made to reduce CIT, especially for older circulatory death donor kidneys.

Impact of Cold Ischemia Time in Kidney Transplants From Donation After Circulatory Death Donors

BACKGROUND

Deceased-donor kidneys are exposed to ischemic events from donor instability during the process of donation after circulatory death (DCD). Clinicians may be reluctant to transplant DCD kidneys with prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) for fear of an additional deleterious effect.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study examining US registry data between 1998 and 2013 of adult first-time kidney-only recipients of paired kidneys (derived from the same donor transplanted into different recipients) from DCD donors.

RESULTS

On multivariable analysis, death-censored graft survival (DCGS) was comparable between recipients of kidneys with higher CIT relative to paired donor recipients with lower CIT when the CIT difference was 1 hour or longer (adjusted hazard ratio, [aHR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.17; n = 6276), 5 hours or longer (aHR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.80-1.19; n = 3130), 10 hours or longer (aHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.82-1.60; n = 1124) or 15 hours (aHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.66-1.99; n = 498). There was a higher rate of primary non function in the long CIT groups for delta 1 hour or longer (0.89% vs 1.63%; P = 0.006), 5 hours (1.09% vs 1.67%, P = 0.13); 10 hours (0.53% vs 1.78%; P = 0.03), and 15 hours (0.40% vs 1.61%; P = 0.18), respectively. Between each of the 4 delta CIT levels of shorter and longer CIT, there was a significantly and incrementally higher rate of delayed graft function in the long CIT groups for delta 1 hour or longer (37.3% vs 41.7%; P < 0.001), 5 hours (35.9% vs 42.7%; P < 0.001), 10 hours (29.4% vs 44.2%, P < 0.001), and 15 hours (29.6% vs 46.1%, P < 0.001), respectively. Overall patient survival was comparable with delta CITs of 1 hour or longer (aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84-1.08), 5 hours (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.85-1.20), and 15 hours (aHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.79-2.06) but not 10 hours (aHR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.09-1.98).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that in the setting of a prior ischemic donor event, prolonged CIT has limited bearing on long-term outcomes.

Recommendations for donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation in Europe

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors provides an invaluable source for kidneys for transplantation. Over the last decade, we have observed a substantial increase in the number of DCD kidneys, particularly within Europe. We provide an overview of risk factors associated with DCD kidney function and survival and formulate recommendations from the sixth international conference on organ donation in Paris, for best-practice guidelines. A systematic review of the literature was performed using Ovid Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. Topics are discussed, including donor selection, organ procurement, organ preservation, recipient selection and transplant management.

Outcome and cost analysis of induction immunosuppression with IL2Mab or ATG in DCD kidney transplants

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation from DCD now represents a significant part of the overall transplant activity in the UK. Outcome of different induction immunosuppression regimes and related cost benefit analysis has been reported by very few studies.This is a single centre study on frequency-matched patients who received a DCD kidney transplant between August 2007 and August 2009.

METHODS

Data on 45 patients divided in 2 groups were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Group A (24 patients) received IL2Mab and Group B (21 patients) ATG as induction immunosuppression. Patient and graft survival were similar in both groups.

RESULTS

In the ATG-induced group, there was a significant lower rate of DGF, BPAR, and infections requiring readmission.A cost analysis was performed including all immunosuppression-related costs, and it has shown remarkable savings in the ATG-induced group.

CONCLUSION

Considering that the number of DCD kidney transplants is destined to rise in the UK, we believe that ATG is a valid option to continue optimizing outcomes of DCD kidney transplant. In our experience, ATG proved to be safe, effective, and contributed to significant cost savings.

Does national sharing of kidneys donated after cardiac death lead to poorer outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Kidneys donated after cardiac death (DCD) represent an increasing proportion of transplant activity. There have been concerns that wider sharing of these kidneys increases the cold ischemic time (CIT) and leads to poorer outcomes.

METHODS

DCD kidney transplantation was implemented in Scotland in 2005, with each center transplanting locally donated kidneys. A national sharing scheme of DCD kidneys was introduced in 2007, whereby kidneys are shared between the 2 renal transplant centers in the country. A single national multiorgan retrieval team carries out retrievals and kidneys are shipped directly to the 2 units. Donor and recipient demographic data, cold ischemic time, and outcome data were prospectively collected and compared within each center and between centers pre- and postintroduction of the sharing policy.

RESULTS

Since 2005, 152 DCD kidney transplants have been performed. Since 2007, 68 kidneys were shared between the centers. Recipient demographics were comparable before and after the introduction for the sharing scheme. The CIT was significantly higher in Glasgow (14.30 ± 3.79 hours) compared with Edinburgh (10.72 ± 2.99 hours; P < .001, one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] prior to the introduction of the sharing scheme. Following the implementation of kidney sharing, there was no significant difference in CIT between Glasgow and Edinburgh (10.50 ± 3.34 hours vs 10.53 ± 2.71 hours). A significant reduction in the CIT in Glasgow was noted after sharing was instituted (from 14.30 ± 3.79 hours to 10.50 ± 3.34 hours, P < .001, one-way ANOVA). Patient and graft survivals, acute rejection, and delayed graft function as well as 1-year renal function were comparable in both centers before and after the introduction of the scheme.

CONCLUSION

Wider sharing of DCD kidneys should be encouraged, as it does not compromise clinical outcomes. A transparent and well-established sharing agreement, with no delays in the offering of DCD kidneys, may lead to an improvement in CIT.

Kidney donation after cardiac death

There is continuing disparity between demand for and supply of kidneys for transplantation. This review describes the current state of kidney donation after cardiac death (DCD) and provides recommendations for a way forward. The conversion rate for potential DCD donors varies from 40%-80%. Compared to controlled DCD, uncontrolled DCD is more labour intensive, has a lower conversion rate and a higher discard rate. The super-rapid laparotomy technique involving direct aortic cannulation is preferred over in situ perfusion in controlled DCD donation and is associated with lower kidney discard rates, shorter warm ischaemia times and higher graft survival rates. DCD kidneys showed a 5.73-fold increase in the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and a higher primary non function rate compared to donation after brain death kidneys, but the long term graft function is equivalent between the two. The cold ischaemia time is a controllable factor that significantly influences the outcome of allografts, for example, limiting it to < 12 h markedly reduces DGF. DCD kidneys from donors < 50 function like standard criteria kidneys and should be viewed as such. As the majority of DCD kidneys are from controlled donation, incorporation of uncontrolled donation will expand the donor pool. Efforts to maximise the supply of kidneys from DCD include: implementing organ recovery from emergency department setting; improving family consent rate; utilising technological developments to optimise organs either prior to recovery from donors or during storage; improving organ allocation to ensure best utility; and improving viability testing to reduce primary non function.