1
|
Dias BF, Marques RC, Cardoso C, Faria V, Domingues P, Ribeiro C, Silvano J, Silva D, Pedroso S, Almeida M, Malheiro J, Martins LS. Surgical complications and technical failure of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: A 22-year experience from a single center. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15339. [PMID: 38775413 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/06/2025]
Abstract
Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is the best treatment for selected individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease. Despite advances in surgical techniques, donor and recipient selection, and immunosuppressive therapies, SPKT remains a complex procedure with associated surgical complications and adverse consequences. We conducted a retrospective study that included 263 SPKT procedures performed between May 2000, and December 2022. A total of 65 patients (25%) required at least one relaparotomy, resulting in an all-cause relaparotomy rate of 2.04 events per 100 in-hospital days. Lower donor body mass index was identified as an independent factor associated with reoperation (OR .815; 95% CI: .725-.917, p = .001). Technical failure (TF) occurred in 9.9% of cases, primarily attributed to pancreas graft thrombosis, intra-abdominal infections, bleeding, and anastomotic leaks. Independent predictors of TF at 90 days included donor age above 36 years (HR 2.513; 95% CI 1.162-5.434), previous peritoneal dialysis (HR 2.503; 95% CI 1.149-5.451), and specific pancreas graft reinterventions. The findings highlight the importance of carefully considering donor and recipient factors in SPKT. The incidence of TF in our study population aligns with the recent series. Continuous efforts should focus on identifying and mitigating potential risk factors to enhance SPKT outcomes, thereby reducing post-transplant complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Fraga Dias
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Catarina Cardoso
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | - Vitória Faria
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Vila de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | | | - Catarina Ribeiro
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - José Silvano
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Donzília Silva
- Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sofia Pedroso
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
- UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS - School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuela Almeida
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
- UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS - School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Jorge Malheiro
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
- UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS - School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - La Salete Martins
- Nephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
- UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, ICBAS - School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fehrenbach U, Thiel R, Bady PD, Auer TA, Kahl A, Geisel D, Lopez Hänninen E, Öllinger R, Pratschke J, Gebauer B, Denecke T. CT fluoroscopy-guided pancreas transplant biopsies: a retrospective evaluation of predictors of complications and success rates. Transpl Int 2021; 34:855-864. [PMID: 33604958 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
To identify predictors of biopsy success and complications in CT-guided pancreas transplant (PTX) core biopsy. We retrospectively identified all CT fluoroscopy-guided PTX biopsies performed at our institution (2000-2017) and included 187 biopsies in 99 patients. Potential predictors related to patient characteristics (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), PTX age, PTX volume) and procedure characteristics (biopsy depth, needle size, access path, number of samples, interventionalist's experience) were correlated with biopsy success (sufficient tissue for histologic diagnosis) and the occurrence of complications. Biopsy success (72.2%) was more likely to be obtained in men [+25.3% (10.9, 39.7)] and when the intervention was performed by an experienced interventionalist [+27.2% (8.1, 46.2)]. Complications (5.9%) occurred more frequently in patients with higher PTX age [OR: 1.014 (1.002, 1.026)] and when many (3-4) tissue samples were obtained [+8.7% (-2.3, 19.7)]. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed male gender [OR: 3.741 (1.736, 8.059)] and high experience [OR: 2.923 (1.255, 6.808)] (biopsy success) as well as older PTX age [OR: 1.019 (1.002, 1.035)] and obtaining many samples [OR: 4.880 (1.240, 19.203)] (complications) as independent predictors. Our results suggest that CT-guided PTX biopsy should be performed by an experienced interventionalist to achieve higher success rates, and not more than two tissue samples should be obtained to reduce complications. Caution is in order in patients with older transplants because of higher complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uli Fehrenbach
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Regina Thiel
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Timo A Auer
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Kahl
- Klinik für Nephrologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dominik Geisel
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Enrique Lopez Hänninen
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Klinik für Radiologie, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernhard Gebauer
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Timm Denecke
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Klinik für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Czerwińska M, Gniewkiewicz MS, Gozdowska J, Wyzgał J, Grochowiecki T, Nazarewski S, Kosieradzki M, Durlik M. Analysis of Hospitalizations in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-center Experience in Poland. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:2132-2135. [PMID: 30177124 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-stage renal disease due to type 1 diabetes mellitus appears to be a regular indication for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKT). Although transplantation improves a patient's health condition, it does not mean that all complications will be eliminated. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 73 patients who underwent SPKT and follow-up between 1988 and 2015 at our institute. The number, duration, and reasons for hospitalization at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years after SPKT were analyzed. RESULTS The average number of hospitalizations at 1, 5, 10, 15 years after SPKT were 1.66, 0.39, 0.36, and 0.33, respectively. The main reason for hospitalization over the 15-year period was infections, at 32.4% (SD, 6.8%). Within the first year after SPKT, 6.8% of hospital admissions were caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Over time, the percentage of hospitalizations for cardiovascular complications increased from 0.6% at 1 year to 29% at 12-15 years. Incidence of hospitalization due to cardiovascular complications correlated with a longer period of dialysis and a diagnosis of ischemic heart disease before transplant (r = 0.56, P = .004; r = 0.54, P < .0001, respectively). At 12-15 years after transplantation, 18.2% of hospitalizations were caused by secondary complications of diabetes. CONCLUSION The most common reason for hospitalization after SPKT is infectious complications. In the first year posttransplant, there is a high percentage of CMV infections. Hospitalization associated with cardiovascular complications was found to be most common in the latter follow-up period and showed a correlation with longer dialysis period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Czerwińska
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M S Gniewkiewicz
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - J Gozdowska
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - J Wyzgał
- Department of Nephrology Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - T Grochowiecki
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - S Nazarewski
- Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Kosieradzki
- Department of General and Transplantation Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - M Durlik
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Development and results of a novel pancreas transplant program in Spain: the surgeon's point of view. Cir Esp 2018; 96:205-212. [PMID: 29501238 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2017] [Revised: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage chronic renal disease is widely performed. However, the rate of surgical morbidity from pancreatic complications remains high. The aim of this study was to describe the development and results of a new program, from the point of view of the pancreatic surgeon. METHODS We analyzed 53 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations performed over a period of seven years (2009-2016), with a median follow up of 39 months (range: 1-86 months). RESULTS Out of the total of this series, two patients died: one patient because of cardiac arrest immediately after surgery; and another patient due to traffic accident, complicated by pneumonia. Among the 51 living patients, two grafts were lost: one due to chronic rejection four years after transplantation; and the other due to arterial thrombosis 20 days after transplantation (the only case requiring transplantectomy). In ten patients, one or more re-operations were necessary due to the following: graft pancreatitis (n=4), small intestinal obstruction (n=4), arterial thrombosis (n=1), fistula (n=1) and hemoperitoneum (n=1). Overall patient and graft survival rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 98, 95 and 95% and 96, 93 and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study has shown that the results of a new pancreas transplant program, which relies on the previous experience of other groups, do not demonstrate a learning curve. Adequate surgeon education and training, as well as the proper use of standardized techniques, should ensure optimal results.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ong SC, Lee VTW, Lim JFY, Chow WL, Tong SC, Kee TYS, Madhavan K. Is simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant the most cost-effective strategy for type 1 diabetes patients with renal failure? PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE 2015. [DOI: 10.1177/2010105815610137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant (SPK) has shown beneficial outcomes in type 1 diabetes patients with renal failure (IDDM-RF). The objective of this study was to assess its cost-effectiveness compared with other treatment strategies for IDDM-RF. Methods: A decision analytic model was developed for IDDM-RF treatment with four possible strategies: deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT), living donor kidney transplant (LDKT), SPK and dialysis. A cost-utility analysis from the healthcare provider perspective was conducted based on a five-year model. Local data were used whenever possible except for SPK survival variables, wherein data from United Network for Organ Sharing and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were used. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of uncertainties around key variables. Results: In the baseline analysis, LDKT was the most cost-effective strategy with the lowest cost per quality-adjusted life year gained, i.e. SGD77,068, followed by SPK (SGD82,991), DDKT (SGD92,432) and dialysis (SGD181,192). The DDKT was extended dominated by dialysis and LDKT strategies. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with dialysis as a reference for LDKT and SPK strategies were SGD43,094 and SGD56,201, respectively. Both strategies are considered highly cost-effective under World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. In the sensitivity analysis, a 6% increase in both SPK kidney graft survival and patient survival would make SPK the most cost-effective strategy. Conclusions: Both LDKT and SPK are highly cost-effective strategies in the treatment of IDDM-RF. SPK is potentially the most cost-effective strategy if a 6% increase in both SPK kidney graft survival and patient survival is achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siew Chin Ong
- Department of Pharmacostatistics, Info Kinetics Ptd. Ltd., Penang, Malaysia
| | - Victor Tswen-Wen Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
- National University of Singapore, Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore
| | | | - Wai Leng Chow
- Health Services Research, Eastern Health Alliance, Singapore
| | - Shao Chuen Tong
- Health Services Research, Eastern Health Alliance, Singapore
| | | | - Krishnakumar Madhavan
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
- National University of Singapore, Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The impact of method on kidney graft and patient survival in kidney-pancreas transplantations for type I diabetes mellitus. Int Surg 2015; 100:137-41. [PMID: 25594654 DOI: 10.9738/intsurg-d-13-00050.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients who develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with Type I Diabetes Mellitus may receive kidney alone (KA) transplantation, simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation, or a pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation. The goal of this study is to examine the long-term impact of pancreas transplantation on kidney graft and patient survival rates. A total of 85 transplantation cases, consisting of 30 that received living donor KA, 21 that received SPK, and 34 that received PAK, from 2003-2010 at Akdeniz University Organ Transplantation Institute were retrospectively screened. There was a graft loss in 4 cases from the KA group, and in 1 case from each of the SPK and PAK groups. The five-year kidney graft survival rates were 86.7% in KA, 95.2% in SPK, and 97.1% in PAK. There was a single patient loss in both KA and SPK. The kidney survival percentages were higher in SPK and PAK groups compared to the KA group. Therefore, SPK should be the primary preference in these patients; however, for the cases that have a living donor, pancreas transplantation should be considered after kidney transplantation, or the patients can be followed-up on with close blood sugar control.
Collapse
|
7
|
Montiel-Casado MC, Pérez-Daga JA, Aranda-Narváez JM, Fernández-Burgos I, Sánchez-Pérez B, León-Díaz FJ, Cabello-Díaz M, Rodríguez-Burgos D, Hernández-Marrero D, Santoyo-Santoyo J. Pancreas graft survival in simultaneous pancreas-kidney versus pancreas-after-kidney and pancreas alone transplantations: a single institution experience. Transplant Proc 2014; 45:3609-11. [PMID: 24314973 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreas transplantation offers excellent outcomes today in patients who have type-1 diabetes mellitus (DM) with difficult control in terms of increasing patient and pancreatic graft survival. Different factors in donors, recipients, and the perioperative period have been associated with long-term graft survival. The aim of this study was to compare pancreatic graft survival in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and the other two modalities, pancreas-alone and pancreas-after-kidney transplantation (non-SPK), at our institution. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 63 pancreas transplantation patients from January 2007 to May 2012 at our institution. The patients were divided into two groups: SPK and non-SPK transplantations. We excluded those patients who had transplants with vascular graft loss. The primary endpoint was 1-year and overall graft survival with consideration of multiple relevant variables. Non-parametric tests were calculated with the statistical package SPSS 20 (SPSS INC, Chicago, IL). RESULTS The 1-year and overall graft survival in this period was 87.3% and 82.5%, respectively. The median follow-up was 963 days. The causes of graft loss were vascular (64%) and immunologic (34%). Finally, we included 56 pancreas transplantations, 46 (82%) were SPK and 10 (18%) non-SPK. The donor and recipient characteristics were similar in both groups, except for the duration of DM (SPK 22 years vs. non-SPK 29 years) and recipient body mass index (SPK 23 vs. non-SPK 28); P = .042 and P = .003, respectively. The cold ischemia time was 563 minutes (standard deviation, 145). Bivariate analysis showed that long-term graft loss was only influenced by matching for gender (P = .023). Using the Kaplan-Meier method, the pancreas graft survival was better in SPK than in non-SPK transplants (log rank .038). CONCLUSIONS Patients who receive pancreas-alone or pancreas-after-kidney grafts have shorter long-term graft survival. Multiple strategies should be applied to improve immunologic surveillance and obtain an early diagnosis of graft rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Montiel-Casado
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pancreas transplantation: a single-institution experience in Japan. Surg Today 2013; 43:1406-11. [PMID: 23423217 PMCID: PMC3898363 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-013-0516-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2012] [Accepted: 09/24/2012] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We herein report our experience with pancreas transplantation in 26 patients at a single institution in Japan between August 2001 and December 2011. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 26 pancreas transplantations performed in our institute. Results The early complications (within 2 weeks) included one graft venous thrombosis, one arterial thrombosis, and two reoperations for bleeding. Of the 26 pancreas transplant recipients, five lost pancreas graft function. Of 24 simultaneous pancreas–kidney recipients, three lost kidney graft function due to noncompliance. The patient, pancreas, and kidney survival rates were 100, 96 and 93 % at 1 year; 100, 80 and 93 % at 5 years; and 100, 67 and 68 % at 10 years, respectively. Of all these complications, venous thrombosis after pancreas transplantation was the most critical. Conclusions As the largest series of pancreas transplantations in a single institution in Japan, our series yielded better results than the worldwide data recorded by the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. Routine postoperative anticoagulation therapy is not necessary for the prevention of graft thrombosis if sufficient fluid infusion is strictly controlled and the graft blood flow is frequently monitored. When graft thrombosis occurs, both early detection and appropriate intervention are extremely important if the pancreas graft is to survive.
Collapse
|
9
|
Acute cellular rejection in intra-abdominal solid organ allografts – immunology under the light microscope. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mpdhp.2012.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|