Clinicopathologic Analysis of Acute Vascular Rejection Cases After Renal Transplantation

Early Transplant Arteriopathy in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early dysfunction of renal allografts may be associated with vascular injury, which raises the specter of active rejection processes that require medical intervention. In our practice, we have encountered patients who present with delayed graft function and demonstrate a unique pattern of endothelial cell injury that raises concern for rejection in their biopsy. Therefore, we sought to systematically determine the biopsy characteristics and outcome of these patients.

METHODS

During a 17-year period at the University of Washington in Seattle, United States, we identified 24 cases of a distinct arterial vasculopathy presenting in the first year posttransplantation. This early transplant arteriopathy (ETA) is characterized by endothelial cell swelling and intimal edema but without the intimal arteritis that defines vascular rejection.

RESULTS

Approximately 1% of transplant biopsies during the study period showed ETA, almost all of which were in deceased donor organs (96%), and most presented with delayed graft function (54%) or increased serum creatinine (38%) soon after transplantation (median 13 days; range, 5-139). In this study, 77% of patients were managed expectantly, with only 2 patients (7.6%) subsequently developing acute vascular rejection. Except for 1 patient who died, all patients had functioning allografts at 1 year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Recognizing ETA and distinguishing it from vascular rejection is important to prevent over-treatment because most patients appear to recover allograft function rapidly with expectant management.

Advances in pharmacotherapy to treat kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Current immunosuppressive combination therapy provides excellent prevention of T-cell-mediated rejection following renal transplantation; however, antibody-mediated rejection remains of high concern and accounts for a large number of long-term allograft losses. The recent development of protocol biopsies resulted in the definition of subclinical rejection (SCR), showing histologic evidence for rejection but unremarkable clinical course.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the current knowledge and evidence of pharmacotherapy to treat kidney allograft rejections and covers SCR treatment options. Each substance is analyzed with regard to its classical indication and further discussed for the treatment of other forms of rejection.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite a lack of randomized trials, early acute T-cell-mediated rejection can be treated effectively in most cases without graft loss. The necessity to treat SCR is currently unclear. Due to a lack of effective therapies, new treatment approaches for antibody-mediated rejection are an urgent medical need to improve long-term outcomes. Future research should aim to better define pathophysiology and histology, stratify risk, and develop rational treatment strategies from randomized controlled trials, in order to establish the value of novel therapies in the arsenal of rejection pharmacotherapy. However, the effective prevention of rejection with minimal side effects still remains the goal in immunosuppression.