Difference of regeneration potential between healthy and diseased liver

Improved liver function in patients with cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C virus who achieve sustained virologic response is not accompanied by increased liver volume

BACKGROUND

Serum albumin level improves in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) with antiviral therapy. However, it remains controversial whether liver volume increases along with SVR.

METHODS

Patients with chronic HCV infection with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who achieved SVR with anti-HCV treatment from March 2003 to November 2017 were enrolled. Patients were followed up with periodic computed tomography (CT) scans to detect HCC recurrence. Patients who underwent treatment for HCC recurrence within 1 year after initiation of anti-HCV treatment were excluded. Laboratory data, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, serum albumin level, and platelet count, were collected at baseline and timepoints after treatment initiation. Liver volume was evaluated at baseline and 24 and 48 weeks after treatment initiation using a CT volume analyzer. A linear mixed-effects model was applied to analyze the chronologic change in liver volume. The correlations between changes in ALT level, albumin level, and liver volume were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 108 enrolled patients, 78 had cirrhosis. Serum albumin level continued to increase through 48 weeks after treatment initiation. A significant increase in liver volume was observed only in patients without cirrhosis (P = 0.005). There was a significant correlation between ALT level decrease and albumin level increase (P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Improved liver albumin production with SVR was contributed by improved liver cell function rather than increased liver volume in patients with cirrhosis.

Evaluation of liver regeneration and post-hepatectomy liver failure after hemihepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Aim: To explore clinical factors associated with extent of liver regeneration after hemihepatectomy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods: Future liver remnant volume (as a percentage of functional liver volume, %FLRV) and remnant liver volume were measured preoperatively and at 1, 5, 9, and 13 weeks postoperatively.Results: After hepatectomy, 1 of 125 patients (0.8%) died within 3 months, 13 (10.4%) experienced liver failure, and 99 (79.2%) experienced complications. %FLRV was able to predict liver failure with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.900, and a cut-off value of 42.7% showed sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 88.6%. Postoperative median growth ratio was 21.3% at 1 week, 30.9% at 5 weeks, 34.6% at 9 weeks, and 37.1% at 13 weeks. Multivariate analysis identified three predictors associated with liver regeneration: FLRV < 601 cm3, %FLRV, and liver cirrhosis. At postoperative weeks (POWs) 1 and 5, liver function indicators were significantly better among patients showing high extent of regeneration than among those showing low extent, but these differences disappeared by POW 9.Conclusions: FLRV, %FLRV, and liver cirrhosis strongly influence extent of liver regeneration after hepatectomy. %FLRV values below 42.7% are associated with greater risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure.

Prediction of liver remnant regeneration after living donor liver transplantation using preoperative CT texture analysis

PURPOSE

To predict the rate of liver regeneration after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using pre-operative computed tomography (CT) texture analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

112 living donors who performed right hepatectomy for LDLT were included retrospectively. We measured the volume of future remnant liver (FLR) on pre-operative CT and the volume of remnant liver (LR) on follow-up CT, taken at a median of 123 days after transplantation. The regeneration index (RI) was calculated using the following equation: [Formula: see text]. Computerized texture analysis of the semi-automatically segmented FLR was performed. We used a stepwise, multivariable linear regression to assess associations of clinical features and texture parameters in relation to RI and to make the best-fit predictive model.

RESULTS

The mean RI was 110.7 ± 37.8%, highly variable ranging from 22.4% to 247.0%. Among texture parameters, volume of FLR, standard deviation, variance, and gray level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM) contrast were found to have significant correlations between RI. In multivariable analysis, smaller volume of FLR (ß - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.22 to - 0.13) and lower GLCM contrast (ß - 1.87, 95% CI - 3.64 to - 0.10) were associated with higher RI. The regression equation predicting RI was following: RI = 203.82 + 10.42 × pre-operative serum total bilirubin (mg/dL) - 0.17 × V_FLR (cm³) - 1.87 × GLCM contrast (× 100).

CONCLUSION

Volume of FLR and GLCM contrast were independent predictors of RI, showing significant negative correlations. Pre-operative CT with texture analysis can be useful for predicting the rate of liver regeneration in living donor of liver transplantation.

Ischemic complications after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: Liver volume loss and recovery

AIM

The liver regrows after acute liver injury and liver resection. However, it is not clear whether the liver regenerates in advanced cirrhosis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical course of, and liver volume change after, ischemic liver complications caused by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We enrolled 35 patients with ischemic complications after RFA. Ischemic complications were defined as rapid elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to over 500 U/L, with typical radiological findings. Patient characteristics and the ischemic liver volume were investigated. Long-term liver volume changes at 3-8 months after ischemic complications were also assessed in 32 patients. We also assessed the overall survival rate after ischemic complications.

RESULTS

The median value of peak AST was 798 U/L (range, 531-4096 U/L). The median ischemic liver volume relative to the functional liver volume before RFA was 13% (range, 3.1-46.5%). There was a strong correlation between the peak AST value and the ischemic liver volume (r = 0.84, P < 0.001). The liver volume recovered to some extent in 18 of 32 (56%) patients after ischemic complications. The survival rate after ischemic complications was 45.7% at 5 years and correlated with the functional liver volume after ischemic complications (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemic complications after RFA can lead to massive liver parenchymal loss. Although the liver volume recovered to some extent in the majority of our patients, ischemic liver complications after RFA should be avoided to improve the overall survival rate.

Hypertrophy of the Left Liver in Patients with Large Tumors in the Right Liver

BACKGROUND

It has been speculated that, when right-sided major hepatectomy (RSMH) is planned for patients with large tumors in the right liver, it may not lead to a marked decrease in normally functional hepatic mass.

METHODS

We collected data for patients who had undergone RSMH for tumors more than 8 cm in diameter (n=50) and compared them with control patients who had undergone RSMH for tumors less than 5 cm in diameter (n=21).

RESULTS

The ratio of the remnant left liver volume to the nontumorous liver volume (left liver ratio) in the patients with large tumors was significantly greater than that in the control group (50.0±12.8% vs. 40.2±8.3%, p=0.002). Left liver ratio was significantly correlated with tumor volume (p<0.001). Preoperative portal vein embolization was performed in only four of the 50 patients with large tumors. None of the patients with large tumors developed postoperative liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Left liver volume in patients with large tumors in the right liver was larger than usual, perhaps reducing the risk of postoperative liver insufficiency after RSMH.

Liver planning software accurately predicts postoperative liver volume and measures early regeneration

BACKGROUND

Postoperative or remnant liver volume (RLV) after hepatic resection is a critical predictor of perioperative outcomes. This study investigates whether the accuracy of liver surgical planning software for predicting postoperative RLV and assessing early regeneration.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients eligible for hepatic resection were approached for participation in the study from June 2008 to 2010. All patients underwent cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) before and early after resection. Planned remnant liver volume (pRLV) (based on the planned resection on the preoperative scan) and postoperative actual remnant liver volume (aRLV) (determined from early postoperative scan) were measured using Scout Liver software (Pathfinder Therapeutics Inc.). Differences between pRLV and aRLV were analyzed, controlling for timing of postoperative imaging. Measured total liver volume (TLV) was compared with standard equations for calculating volume.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were enrolled in the study from June 2008 to June 2010 at 3 treatment centers. Correlation was found between pRLV and aRLV (r = 0.941; p < 0.001), which improved when timing of postoperative imaging was considered (r = 0.953; p < 0.001). Relative volume deviation from pRLV to aRLV stratified cases according to timing of postoperative imaging showed evidence of measurable regeneration beginning 5 days after surgery, with stabilization at 8 days (p < 0.01). For patients at the upper and lower extremes of liver volumes, TLV was poorly estimated using standard equations (up to 50% in some cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative virtual planning of future liver remnant accurately predicts postoperative volume after hepatic resection. Early postoperative liver regeneration is measureable on imaging beginning at 5 days after surgery. Measuring TLV directly from CT scans rather than calculating based on equations accounts for extremes in TLV.