Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Renal Transplant Patients after Switch From Standard Tacrolimus to Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus

Comparison of the Prolonged- and Immediate-Release Tacrolimus Capsule Formulation: The Patient's View and Medication Satisfaction of Patients After Pediatric Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Medication adherence is essential for long-term success after pediatric organ transplantation. Causes of reduced adherence should be detected early to improve the consequent medication intake. We describe the influence of switching from tacrolimus twice daily (tacrolimus-BID) to tacrolimus once daily (tacrolimus-QD) on medication satisfaction and medication adherence in patients after pediatric heart transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted regarding patient satisfaction and adherence to the immunosuppressant tacrolimus after pediatric heart transplantation, before and after conversion from tacrolimus-BID to tacrolimus-QD, using questionnaires.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled (tacrolimus-BID: n = 35, mean age 15.7 ± 5.2 years; tacrolimus-QD: n = 38, mean age 16.2 ± 5.6 years). The amount of unadministered medication in the last 3 months did not differ between the 2 pharmaceutical forms. However, 17% (n = 6) reported unstable tacrolimus trough levels when taking tacrolimus-BID, vs 8% (n = 3) under tacrolimus-QD (P = .453). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the stability of the last 6 trough levels of each patient (P = .074). A total of 57% (n = 20) of patients had subjective side effects before conversion, compared to only 29% (n = 11) after conversion (P = .013). Regarding the intensity of the side effects, 6 patients reported strong/very strong side effects when taking tacrolimus-BID vs 1 patient when taking tacrolimus-QD (P = .250). In addition, the overall satisfaction with the immunosuppressant was higher under tacrolimus-QD (92% vs 83%; P = .508). However, this improvement was statistically not significant and may not be clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of forgotten medication was not reduced after conversion from tacrolimus-BID to tacrolimus-QD. However, subjective side effects as well as patient satisfaction improved under tacrolimus-QD.

A non-randomized trial of conversion from ciclosporin and tacrolimus to tacrolimus MR4 in stable long-term kidney transplant recipients: Graft function and influences of ABCB1 genotypes

In this non-randomized extension study of a randomized controlled trial we converted 87 stable long-term kidney transplant recipients (KTR) from either ciclosporin (CSA, n = 28) or tacrolimus (TAC, n = 59) to TAC modified release (TAC MR4) to study the characteristics of TAC trough levels after conversion with the primary endpoint graft function after 12 months. TAC MR4 consumption was calculated by level-to-dose ([ng/mL]/[mg/d]) and concentration-to-dose ([mg/kg])/d) ratios. Influences of ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (2677G>T/A, 1236C>T, 3435C>T) on TAC metabolism were studied. Graft function of KTR converted from CSA to TAC MR4 significantly declined over 12 months, and remained unchanged after conversion from TAC to TAC MR4. Conversion from CSA to TAC MR4 resulted in supra therapeutic- and conversion from TAC to TAC MR4 in low trough levels. We could not find associations of ABCB1 genotypes and TAC MR4 trough levels. Adverse events and errors with TAC/TAC MR4 intake were common. In stable long-term KTR conversion from TAC to TAC MR4 is feasible. For conversion from CSA we suggest a rate of 1:40 for a rough estimation of TAC MR4 target doses.

High Intrapatient Tacrolimus Variability Is Associated With Worse Outcomes in Renal Transplantation Using a Low-Dose Tacrolimus Immunosuppressive Regime

BACKGROUND

High intrapatient tacrolimus variability has been associated with worse clinical outcomes postrenal transplantation. Theoretically, tacrolimus levels consistently outside the target therapeutic window may result in allograft dysfunction as subtherapeutic tacrolimus levels predispose to episodes of acute rejection, whereas supratherapeutic levels may cause nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

We investigated the effect of tacrolimus variability in a "Symphony" style low-dose tacrolimus based regime, by collecting data from 432 patients over a 4-year period.Three hundred seventy-six patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 1495 days. Tacrolimus variability 6 to 12 months after renal transplantation was calculated, and outcomes were compared in low (n = 186) and high variability (n = 190) groups.

RESULTS

High variability patients were found to be at increased risk of rejection during the first posttransplant year (P = 0.0054) and to have reduced rejection-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.953; 95% confidence interval, 1.234-3.093; P = 0.0054). High variability patients had significantly worse (P < 0.0001) glomerular filtration rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years posttransplant. High variability patients were at increased risk of allograft loss (hazard ratio, 4.928; 95% confidence interval, 2.050-11.85; P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

This suggests that highly variable tacrolimus levels predict worse outcomes postrenal transplantation, although the causal nature of this relationship remains unclear. High tacrolimus variability may identify a subset of patients who warrant increased surveillance and patient education regarding dietary and medication compliance.

Update on the clinical utility of once-daily tacrolimus in the management of transplantation

Adherence to immunosuppression and minimizing variability in drug exposure are important considerations in preventing rejection and maximizing overall transplant outcomes. The availability of once-daily tacrolimus may confer potential benefit by simplifying immunosuppressive regimens, thereby improving medication adherence among transplant recipients. Pharmacokinetic studies in healthy normal volunteers and stable transplant recipients suggest that once-daily tacrolimus is bioequivalent to twice-daily tacrolimus. Efficacy studies suggest that once-daily tacrolimus is noninferior to twice-daily tacrolimus with a concentration-dependent rejection risk. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival are more or less comparable between the two tacrolimus formulations. Once-daily tacrolimus has also been reported to have favorable effects on blood pressure, lipid profile, and glucose tolerance. Once-daily tacrolimus may be a viable option to consider for de novo immunosuppression or for conversion from conventional tacrolimus.