Pediatric Liver Transplant Outcome Using Severe Hypernatremic Donors

Prognostic factors influencing outcome in adult liver transplantation using hypernatremic organ donation after brain death

BACKGROUND

Hypernatremic donors was regarded as the expanded criteria donors in liver transplantation. The study was to investigate the effects of donor hypernatremia on the outcomes of liver transplantation and identify the prognostic factors possibly contributing to the poor outcomes.

METHODS

Donor serum sodium levels before procurement were categorized as normal sodium (< 155 mmol/L), moderate high sodium (155-170 mmol/L), and severe high sodium (≥ 170 mmol/L). Furthermore, we subdivided the 142 hypernatremic donors (≥ 155 mmol/L) into two subgroups: subgroup A, the exposure time of liver grafts from hypernatremia to reperfusion was < 36 h; and subgroup B, the exposure time was ≥ 36 h. The outcomes included initial graft function, survival rates of grafts and recipients, graft loss and early events within the first year following liver transplantation.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the 1-year survival rates of grafts and recipients, 1-year graft loss rates and early events among the normal, moderate high and severe high sodium groups. However, the overall survival rates of grafts and recipients in subgroup A were significantly higher than those in subgroup B. Cox model showed that the exposure time (HR = 1.117; 95% CI: 1.053-1.186; P < 0.001), cold ischemia time (HR = 1.015; 95% CI: 1.006-1.024; P = 0.001) and MELD (HR = 1.061; 95% CI: 1.003-1.121; P = 0.037) were the important prognostic factors contributing to the poor outcomes of recipients with hypernatremic donors.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of donor sodium immediately before organ procurement does not have negative effects on the early outcomes following adult liver transplantation. For hypernatremia liver donors, minimization of the exposure time from hypernatremia to reperfusion is critical to prevent graft loss.

Fulminant acute hepatitis in pediatrics in Latin America and the Caribbean

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to investigate the epidemiology of Fulminant Acute Hepatitis in Latin America and the Caribbean and identify possible measures aimed at a better understanding and improvement of patient support. METHODS: We used 3 different researchers to investigate the topic of Fulminant Acute Hepatitis in pediatrics in papers published by Latin American and Caribbean authors in the PubMed and SciELO databases from 2000 to 2016. RESULTS: We found 2,879 articles in the databases searched. After selecting and excluding articles according to the study protocol, 68 remaining studies were obtained for analysis. A total of 1,265 cases of acute fulminant hepatitis were detected, with a predominance of females (42.9%), followed by males (39.4%), with no description of sex in 17.7% of the cases. The main cause was viral hepatitis, representing 45.1% of the cases. The hepatitis A virus was responsible for 34.7% of the total cases and 76.9% of the infectious causes. Of the total number of patients, 26.9% were described as idiopathic, and 11.5% had no cause. CONCLUSION: The preventable causes of Fulminant Acute Hepatitis include hepatitis viruses - primarily the hepatitis A virus - and poisoning. Active vaccination, basic sanitation, and public awareness can reduce the number of patients and, consequently, the costs of liver transplantation due to these causes.

Global lessons in graft type and pediatric liver allocation: A path toward improving outcomes and eliminating wait-list mortality

Current literature and policy in pediatric liver allocation and organ procurement are reviewed here in narrative fashion, highlighting historical context, ethical framework, technical/procurement considerations, and support for a logical way forward to an equitable pediatric liver allocation system that will improve pediatric wait-list and posttransplant outcomes without adversely affecting adults. Where available, varying examples of successful international pediatric liver allocation and split-liver policy will be compared to current US policy to highlight potential strategies that can be considered globally. Liver Transplantation 23:86-95 2017 AASLD.

Extended criteria donors in liver transplantation Part I: reviewing the impact of determining factors

The definition and factors of extended criteria donors have already been set; however, details of the various opinions still differ in many respects. In this review, we summarize the impact of these factors and their clinical relevance. Elderly livers must not be allocated for hepatitis C virus (HCV) positives, or patients with acute liver failure. In cases of markedly increased serum transaminases, donor hemodynamics is an essential consideration. A prolonged hypotension of the donor does not always lead to an increase in post-transplantation graft loss if post-OLT care is proper. Hypernatremia of less than 160 mEq/L is not an absolute contraindication to accept a liver graft per se. The presence of steatosis is an independent and determinant risk factor for the outcome. The gold standard of the diagnosis is the biopsy. This is recommended in all doubtful cases. The use of HCV+ grafts for HCV+ recipients is comparable in outcome. The leading risk factor for HCV recurrence is the actual RNA positivity of the donor. The presence of a proper anti-HBs level seems to protect from de novo HBV infection. A favourable outcome can be expected if a donation after cardiac death liver is transplanted in a favourable condition, meaning, a warm ischemia time < 30 minutes, cold ischemia time < 8-10 hours, and donor age 50-60 years. The pathway of organ quality assessment is to obtain the most relevant information (e.g. biopsy), consider the co-existing donor risk factors and the reserve capacity of the recipient, and avoid further technical issues.