How Long Should We Follow the Post-transplantation Patient after Graft Loss? A Case Report of Renal Cancer in the Grafted Kidney that Occurred 16 Years after Graft Loss

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting rare post-surgical cardiac metastasis of metaplastic breast carcinoma: a case report

Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast is an extremely rare and highly aggressive malignancy associated with a poor prognosis. Breast spindle cell carcinoma is a subtype of metaplastic carcinoma. We present the case of a 48-year-old woman who was found to have a breast nodule during a routine examination two years ago. Pathological examination following surgical resection confirmed the diagnosis of breast spindle cell carcinoma. One year later, a follow-up CT scan detected a progressively enlarging mass in the left lower lobe of the lung, which was histologically confirmed as metastatic breast spindle cell carcinoma after surgical excision. Recently, the patient developed chest discomfort and severe left thigh pain, prompting an18F-FDG PET/CT scan, which revealed metastases to the lung, heart, pleura, and femur. Subsequently, the patient's condition deteriorated rapidly within a short period. This report highlights the rare imaging findings of cardiac metastasis following surgery for breast spindle cell carcinoma, underscoring the highly aggressive nature of this tumor and the pivotal role of18F-FDG PET/CT in the post-operative monitoring of patients with breast spindle cell carcinoma.

Management of renal cell carcinoma in transplant kidney: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

After transplantation, approximately 10% of renal cell carcinomas are detected in graft kidneys. These tumors (gRCC) present surgeons with the difficulty of finding a treatment that guarantees both oncological clearance and maintenance of function. We conducted a systematic review and an individual patient data meta-analysis on the oncology, safety and functional outcomes of the available treatments for gRCC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search was performed across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science including any study reporting perioperative, functional and survival outcomes for patients undergoing graft nephrectomy (GN), partial nephrectomy (PN) or thermal ablation (TA) for gRCC. Quade's ANCOVA, Spearman Rho and Pearson χ², Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank and Standard Cox regression and other tests were used to compare treatments. Studies' quality was evaluated using a modified version of Newcastle Ottawa Scale.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A number of 29 studies (357 patients) were included. No differences between TA and PN were found in terms of safety, functional and oncological outcomes for T1a gRCCs. When applied to pT1b gRCC, PN showed no difference in complications, progression or cancer-specific deaths compared to smaller lesions; PN validity for pT2 gRCCs should be considered unverified due to lack of sufficient evidence. The efficacy and safety of PN or TA for multiple gRCC remain controversial. In case of non-functioning, large (T≥2), complicated or metastatic gRCCs, GN appears to be the most reasonable choice. Quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Studies with large cohorts and longer follow-up are still needed to clarify oncological and functional differences.

CONCLUSIONS

PN and TA might be offered as a nephron-sparing treatment in patients with T1a gRCC. There is no significant difference between these options and GN in terms of oncological outcomes and complications. PN and TA offer similar functional outcomes and graft preservation. PN for T1b gRCC seems feasible and safe, but its validity should be considered unverified.

Small renal masses in kidney transplantation: overview of clinical impact and management in donors and recipients

Kidney transplantation is the best replacement treatment for the end-stage renal disease. Currently, the imbalance between the number of patients on a transplant list and the number of organs available constitutes the crucial limitation of this approach. To expand the pool of organs amenable for transplantation, kidneys coming from older patients have been employed; however, the combination of these organs in conjunction with the chronic use of immunosuppressive therapy increases the risk of incidence of graft small renal tumors. This narrative review aims to provide the state of the art on the clinical impact and management of incidentally diagnosed small renal tumors in either donors or recipients. According to the most updated evidence, the use of grafts with a small renal mass, after bench table tumor excision, may be considered a safe option for high-risk patients in hemodialysis. On the other hand, an early small renal mass finding on periodic ultrasound-evaluation in the graft should allow to perform a conservative treatment in order to preserve renal function. Finally, in case of a renal tumor in native kidney, a radical nephrectomy is usually recommended.

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for the Origin of De Novo Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Kidney Allograft: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

We present a rare case of de novo renal cell carcinoma that developed in an allograft kidney 14 years after transplantation.

CASE REPORT

A 39-year-old man underwent living donor kidney transplantation from his mother. After 14 years, routine screening ultrasonography revealed a solid mass of 30-mm diameter in the kidney allograft. Partial nephrectomy was performed by clamping the renal artery under in situ cooling. Tissue histology revealed clear cell carcinoma with negative surgical margins. We explored the tumor's genetic origin using fluorescence in situ hybridization to analyze the X and Y chromosomes of the tumor cells. Postoperative hemodialysis was avoided, and the patient's serum creatinine level remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorescence in situ hybridization clearly indicated that the tumor originated from the donor and that the tumor vasculature originated from the recipient. The patient recovered well and remains without any tumor recurrence.

De novo renal carcinoma arising in non-functional kidney graft: a national retrospective study

AIM

Characteristics of renal carcinoma arising in non-functional graft in renal transplant recipients (RTR) are unknown. We studied a large national retrospective cohort to analyze circumstances of diagnosis, treatment and outcome compared to the literature.

METHODS

Study included all RTR presenting with kidney graft tumors irrespective of the histology, except those with lymphoma and including those tumors arising in non-functional renal graft. Between January 1988 and December 2018, 56,806 patients had renal transplantation in the 32 centers participating in this study. Among this cohort, 18 renal graft tumors were diagnosed in non-functional grafts.

RESULTS

The median patient age at the time of diagnosis was 42.1 years (31.7-51.3). Median age of kidney grafts at the time of diagnosis was 56.4 (23.2-63.4). Eight (44.4%) tumors were discovered fortuitously on renal graft histologic analysis. Fourteen tumors (77.8%) were papillary carcinomas. Two patients had clear cell carcinomas and one patient had a pTa high-grade multifocal urothelial carcinoma in the graft of the upper tract with an in situ carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Renal carcinomas in non-functional grafts are rare entities and most of them are diagnosed fortuitously. Despite the fact that these tumors are small, low grade and with a good prognosis, regular monitoring of non-functional grafts should be performed with at least an annual ultrasonography.

Solid Renal Masses in Transplanted Allograft Kidneys: A Closer Look at the Epidemiology and Management

The objective of this review is to explore the available literature on solid renal masses (SRMs) in transplant allograft kidneys to better understand the epidemiology and management of these tumors. A literature review using PubMed was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology. Fifty-six relevant studies were identified from 1988 to 2015. A total of 174 SRMs in 163 patients were identified, with a mean tumor size of 2.75 cm (range 0.5-9.0 cm). Tumor histology was available for 164 (94.3%) tumors: clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC; 45.7%), papillary RCC (42.1%), chromophobe RCC (3%), and others (9.1%). Tumors were managed by partial nephrectomy (67.5%), radical nephrectomy (19.4%), percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (10.4%), and percutaneous cryoablation (2.4%). Of the 131 patients (80.3%) who underwent nephron-sparing interventions, 10 (7.6%) returned to dialysis and eight (6.1%) developed tumor recurrence over a mean follow-up of 2.85 years. Of the 110 patients (67.5%) who underwent partial nephrectomy, 3.6% developed a local recurrence during a mean follow-up of 3.12 years. The current management of SRMs in allograft kidneys mirrors management in the nontransplant population, with notable findings including an increased rate of papillary RCC and similar recurrence rates after partial nephrectomy in the transplant population despite complex surgical anatomy.

De novo renal cell carcinoma in a kidney allograft 20 years after transplant

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a kidney allograft is rare. We report the successful diagnosis and treatment of a de novo RCC in a nonfunctioning kidney transplant 20 years after engraftment. A 54-year-old man received a kidney transplant from his mother when he was 34 years old. After 10 years, chronic rejection resulted in graft failure, and the patient became hemodialysis-dependent. Intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms revealed a solid 13 mm tumor in the kidney graft. The tumor was confirmed on ultrasound examination. This tumor had not been detected on a surveillance noncontrast CT scan. Needle biopsy showed that the tumor was an RCC. Allograft nephrectomy was performed. Pathological examination showed that the tumor was a Fuhrman Grade 2 RCC. XY-fluorescence hybridization analysis of the RCC showed that the tumor cells were of donor origin. One year after the surgery, the patient is alive and has no evidence of tumor recurrence. Regardless of whether a kidney transplant is functioning, it should periodically be imaged for RCC throughout the recipient's lifetime. In our experience, ultrasonography or CT with intravenous contrast is better than CT without contrast for the detection of tumor in a nonfunctioning kidney transplant.