Evaluation of "flat-line" thromboelastography after reperfusion during liver transplantation

Patient Blood Management in Liver Transplant—A Concise Review

Transfusion of blood products in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) significantly increases post-transplant morbidity and mortality and is associated with reduced graft survival. Based on these results, an active effort to prevent and minimize blood transfusion is required. Patient blood management is a revolutionary approach defined as a patient-centered, systematic, evidence-based approach to improve patient outcomes by managing and preserving a patient’s own blood while promoting patient safety and empowerment. This approach is based on three pillars of treatment: (1) detecting and correcting anemia and thrombocytopenia, (2) minimizing iatrogenic blood loss, detecting, and correcting coagulopathy, and (3) harnessing and increasing anemia tolerance. This review emphasizes the importance of the three-pillar nine-field matrix of patient blood management to improve patient outcomes in liver transplant recipients.

Role of Viscoelastic and Conventional Coagulation Tests for Management of Blood Product Replacement in the Bleeding Patient

An important aim of viscoelastic testing (VET) is to implement transfusion algorithms based on coagulation test results to help reduce transfusion rates and improve patient outcomes. Establishing a rapid diagnosis and providing timely treatment of coagulopathy is the cornerstone of management of severely bleeding patients in trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, and major surgery. As the nature of acute bleeding and trauma leads to an unstable and tenuous physiologic state, conventional coagulation tests (CCTs) are too slow to diagnose, manage, and also course correct any hemostatic abnormalities that accompany an acute critical illness. Viscoelastic point-of-care tests strongly correlate with results from standard laboratory tests but are designed to enable clinicians to make timely, informed bleeding management decisions when time to intervene is critical. These assays provide an individualized and goal-oriented approach to patient blood management and are increasingly becoming involved in transfusion algorithms. The scope of this review aims to evaluate the current literature on VETs and their impact on actionable outputs in clinical decision making and their relationship to CCT.

Altered Fibrinolysis during and after Surgery

Major surgery induces hemostatic changes related to surgical stress, tissue destruction, and inflammatory reactions. These changes involve a shift of volume from extravascular space to intravascular and interstitial spaces, a "physiologic" hemodilution of coagulation proteins, and an increase of plasmatic fibrinogen concentration and platelets. Increases in fibrinogen and platelets together with a simultaneous dilution of pro- and anticoagulant factors and development of a hypofibrinolytic status result in a postoperative hypercoagulable state. This profile is accentuated in more extensive surgery, but the balance can shift toward hemorrhagic tendency in specific types of surgeries, for example, in prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass or in patients with comorbidities, especially liver diseases, sepsis, and hematological disorders. Also, acquired coagulopathy can develop in patients with trauma, during obstetric complications, and during major surgery as a result of excessive blood loss and subsequent consumption of coagulation factors as well as hemodilution. In addition, an increasing number of patients receive anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs preoperatively that might influence the response to surgical hemostasis. This review focuses on those situations that may change normal hemostasis and coagulation during surgery, producing both hyperfibrinolysis and hypofibrinolysis, such as overcorrection with coagulation factors, bleeding and hyperfibrinolysis that may occur with extracorporeal circulation and high aortic-portal-vena cava clamps, and hyperfibrinolysis related to severe maintained hemodynamic disturbances. We also evaluate the role of tranexamic acid for prophylaxis and treatment in different surgical settings, and finally the value of point-of-care testing in the operating room is commented with regard to investigation of fibrinolysis.

Perioperative management of antithrombotic treatment

End-stage liver disease is characterized by multiple and complex alterations of hemostasis that are associated with an increased risk of both bleeding and thrombosis. Liver transplantation further challenges the feeble hemostatic balance of patients with decompensated cirrhosis, and the management of antithrombotic treatment during and after transplant surgery, which is particularly difficult. Bleeding was traditionally considered the major concern during and early after surgery, but it is increasingly recognized that transplant recipients may also develop thrombotic complications. Pathophysiology of hemostatic complications during and after transplantation is multifactorial and includes pre-, intra-, and postoperative risk factors. Risk stratification is important, as it helps the identification of high-risk recipients in whom antithrombotic prophylaxis should be considered. In recipients who develop thrombosis during or after surgery, prompt treatment is indicated to prevent graft failure, retransplantation, and death.

The role of evidence-based algorithms for rotational thromboelastometry-guided bleeding management

Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a point-of-care viscoelastic method and enables to assess viscoelastic profiles of whole blood in various clinical settings. ROTEM-guided bleeding management has become an essential part of patient blood management (PBM) which is an important concept in improving patient safety. Here, ROTEM testing and hemostatic interventions should be linked by evidence-based, setting-specific algorithms adapted to the specific patient population of the hospitals and the local availability of hemostatic interventions. Accordingly, ROTEM-guided algorithms implement the concept of personalized or precision medicine in perioperative bleeding management (‘theranostic’ approach). ROTEM-guided PBM has been shown to be effective in reducing bleeding, transfusion requirements, complication rates, and health care costs. Accordingly, several randomized-controlled trials, meta-analyses, and health technology assessments provided evidence that using ROTEM-guided algorithms in bleeding patients resulted in improved patient’s safety and outcomes including perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, the implementation of ROTEM in the PBM concept requires adequate technical and interpretation training, education and logistics, as well as interdisciplinary communication and collaboration.

Viscoelastic Monitoring to Guide Hemostatic Resuscitation in Liver Transplantation Surgery

Coagulopathic bleeding must be anticipated during liver transplantation (LT) surgery. Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) often present with disease-related hematologic disturbances, including the loss of hepatic procoagulant and anticoagulant clotting factors and thrombocytopenia. Transplantation surgery itself presents additional hemostatic changes, including hyperfibrinolysis. Viscoelastic monitoring (VEM) is often used to provide targeted, personalized hemostatic therapies for complex bleeding states including cardiac surgery and major trauma. The use in these coagulopathic conditions led to its application to LT, although the mechanisms of coagulopathy in these patients are quite different. While VEM is often used during transplant surgeries in Europe and North America, evidence supporting its use is limited to a few small clinical studies. The theoretical and clinical applications of the standard and specialized VEM assays are discussed in the setting of LT and ESLD.

Reducing transfusion requirements in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) was historically associated with massive blood loss and transfusion. Over the past two decades transfusion requirements have reduced dramatically and increasingly transfusion-free transplantation is a reality. Both bleeding and transfusion are associated with adverse outcomes in LT. Minimising bleeding and reducing unnecessary transfusions are therefore key goals in the perioperative period. As the understanding of the causes of bleeding has evolved so too have techniques to minimize or reduce the impact of blood loss. Surgical “piggyback” techniques, anaesthetic low central venous pressure and haemodilution strategies and the use of autologous cell salvage, point of care monitoring and targeted correction of coagulopathy, particularly through use of factor concentrates, have all contributed to declining reliance on allogenic blood products. Pre-emptive management of preoperative anaemia and adoption of more restrictive transfusion thresholds is increasingly common as patient blood management (PBM) gains momentum. Despite progress, increasing use of marginal grafts and transplantation of sicker recipients will continue to present new challenges in bleeding and transfusion management. Variation in practice across different centres and within the literature demonstrates the current lack of clear transfusion guidance. In this article we summarise the causes and predictors of bleeding and present the evidence for a variety of PBM strategies in LT.