Urinary tract reconstruction using uretero-ureteral end-to-side anastomosis in kidney transplant recipients

End-to-side versus end-to-end uretero-ureteral anastomosis in preemptive kidney transplantation from living donors: A monocentric experience

PURPOSE

End-to-end (ETE) pyeloureterostomy is an alternative to ureteroneocystostomy for urinary anastomosis during kidney transplantation (KT). In preemptive KT from living donors (PKT-LD), end-to-side (ETS) uretero-ureteral anastomosis could have the benefits of pyeloureterostomy without ligation of the native kidney ureter. This study aimed to compare ETS to ETE uretero-ureteral anastomosis in PKT-LD.

METHODS

A monocentric retrospective 8-year study included all consecutive cases of PKT-LD, excluding ureteroneocystomy anastomosis and homolateral nephrectomy. Two groups were compared: ETS and ETE. Perioperative data on graft function and urological complications were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients were included: 48 patients in the ETS group and 58 patients in the ETE group. Median follow-up was 37.5 months [17.3; 57.5]. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at postoperative day ten and 3 months was similar in both groups. The overall complication rate was 16%, with no significant difference between the 2 groups. There was one ureteral stenosis in each group. None of the patients in the ETS group presented urinary fistula, whereas it occurred in one (1.7%) in the ETE group. Back pain due to native kidney obstruction occurred in 5 patients in the ETE group (8.6%), but not in the ETS group.

CONCLUSION

In preemptive kidney transplantation from living donors, urinary anastomosis can safely be performed as an end-to-side uretero-ureteral anastomosis, with low urological complications. It could prevent symptoms and complications due to native kidney obstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Orthotopic Kidney Transplantation in an Elderly Patient With Various Severe Comorbid Conditions: A Case Report

In recent years, the frequency of high-risk kidney transplantations has increased. We report a case in which a 72-year-old man with various severe comorbidities (prostate cancer, diabetes mellitus, complete atrioventricular block, coronary artery stenosis, severe stenosis of the popliteal arteries, and severe calcification of the iliac arteries) who received an orthotopic kidney transplantation. To prevent the occurrence of acute limb ischemia due to the steal phenomenon (caused by the kidney graft), we decided that a heterotopic kidney transplantation involving the iliac arteries was not an appropriate option. Therefore, as an alternative, left native nephrectomy was performed followed by an orthotopic kidney transplantation to the native renal artery and renal vein through a left subcostal incision. Postoperative ureteral stenosis occurred, and so stent exchange was required every 6 months. Despite the ureteral complication, the patient's serum creatinine level was 1.5 mg/dL at 2 years after the procedure.

End-To-Side Versus End-to-End Uretero-Ureteral Anastomosis in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Disused Atrophic Bladder

BACKGROUND

Extravesical Lich-Gregoir ureteroneocystostomy (UC) is the most widely used method for urinary reconstruction during kidney transplantation. Sometimes it is difficult to perform UC in cases with disused atrophic bladder. Pyelo-ureteral anastomosis (PUA) and uretero-ureteral anastomosis (UUA) may be preferred to UC for these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 833 kidney transplant recipients operated on by our transplantation team between July 2010 and November 2014. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I consisted of 16 patients who underwent end-to-side UUA and Group II consisted of 20 patients who underwent end-to-end UUA. The two groups were compared in terms of efficacy, safety, and graft function.

RESULTS

As we performed end-to-side UUA as a relatively new technique compared with end-to-end UUA, the post-transplantation follow-up period of Group II was significantly longer than Group I (P = .000), but all the patients in both groups had at least 1 year of follow-up. Because the first two patients in Group II, who underwent native ureteral ligation without nephrectomy, developed hydronephrosis in their native kidneys, requiring nephrectomy in the post-transplantation period, we performed native nephrectomy in all of the remaining patients in this group. That is why the mean operative time was significantly longer in Group II compared with Group I (P = .000). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative surgical complications, post-transplantation urinary infections, and graft function.

CONCLUSION

End-to-side UUA without native ureteral ligation is a safe surgical technique for urinary tract reconstruction during kidney transplantation in patients with disused atrophic bladder.