Performing a Right Hemihepatectomy Sequentially After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation—The Solution for a Large-for-size Graft: A Case Report

Graft reduction in adult liver transplantation: indications, techniques, and outcomes

PURPOSE

Graft reduction can be a patient's graft-saving option to avoid large-for-size (LFS) syndrome. This study aimed to summarize the literature on graft reduction in adult liver transplantation and to demonstrate the technique of H67 graft hepatectomy.

METHODS

The technique, shown in a didactical video, entails an ex situ posterior sectionectomy under hypothermic perfusion. The right hepatic vein is identified, and the transection line follows the right hepatic fissure. The Glissonean pedicles are ligated during parenchymal transection.

RESULTS

A narrative review of the literature yielded 7 studies. A total of 15 liver grafts were reduced in adult liver transplantations. Most of the reductions were ex situ (11/15 [73.3%]). Graft reduction entailed an H67 sectionectomy in 10 cases and an H23 sectionectomy in 1 case. In situ reduction included 1 right hepatectomy (H5678), 2 H67 sectionectomies, and 1 H23 left lateral sectionectomy. The duration of the ex situ reduction averaged 56 minutes (median: 40.5 minutes; IQR, 33.0-130.0), and the graft weight-to-recipient weight ratio decreased from 3.57% ± 0.40% to 2.70% ± 0.50% after graft reduction. The average cold ischemia time was 390 minutes (IQR, 230-570). There was no liver retransplantation.

CONCLUSION

Graft reduction in adult liver transplantation may be necessary to avoid LFS syndrome. Graft reduction entailed an H67 sectionectomy in 10 cases and an H23 sectionectomy in 1 case. In situ reduction included 1 right hepatectomy (H5678), 2 H67 sectionectomies, and 1 H23 left lateral sectionectomy.

A Novel Strategy for Preventing Posttransplant Large-For-Size Syndrome in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study

There are two causes of graft compression in the large-for-size syndrome (LFSS). One is a shortage of intra-abdominal space for the liver graft, and the other is the size discrepancy between the anteroposterior dimensions of the liver graft and the lower right hemithorax of the recipient. The former could be treated using delayed fascial closure or mesh closure, but the latter may only be treated by reduction of the right liver graft to increase space. Given that split liver transplantation has strict requirements regarding donor and recipient selections, reduced-size liver transplantation, in most cases, may be the only solution. However, surgical strategies for the reduction of the right liver graft for adult liver transplantations are relatively unfamiliar. Herein, we introduce a novel strategy of HuaXi-ex vivo right posterior sectionectomy while preserving the right hepatic vein in the graft to prevent LFSS and propose its initial indications.

Large-for-Size Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: a Systematic Review of Definitions, Outcomes, and Solutions

BACKGROUND

We systematically reviewed the literature on definitions and outcomes of large-for-size (LFS) syndrome in orthotopic liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase were searched (January 1990-January 2019) for studies reporting LFS in LT. Primary outcomes were definitions and mortality of LFS LT.

RESULTS

Eleven studies reporting patients with LFS LT were identified. Four different formulas (graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), body surface area index (BSAi), donor standardized total liver volume (sTLV)-to-recipient sTLV ratio, and graft weight/right anteroposterior distance (RAP) ratio) with their critical thresholds were found. There were 81 patients (54% women) with a median weight and height of 62.5 kg (range, 40-105 kg) and 165 cm (range, 145-180 cm). The median graft weight was 1772 g (range, 1290-2400 g), and the median GWRW was 2.77% (range, 2.1-4.00%). Graft venous outflow obstruction was described in seven patients (8.6%). At the time of LT, fascial closure was not achieved in 24 patients (29.6%) and the graft size was reduced by a liver resection in three patients (3.7%). Thirteen deaths (16%) were reported in the first 90 postoperative days with two patients undergoing re-transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

LFS LT remains heterogeneously defined but characterized by high mortality rates despite the use of tailored surgical solutions (graft reduction and open abdomen). A composite definition is proposed in order to better describe LFS clinical syndrome.

In Situ Left Lateral Sectionectomy in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Could This Be Another Solution for a Large-for-Size Graft? A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Large-for-size (LFS) graft should be avoided when performing an adult deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) as it is associated with abdominal compartment syndrome, severe graft injury, and primary graft nonfunction. When inadvertently facing with LFS graft intraoperatively, the most commonly reported approach has been a surgical reduction of the right lobe despite its technical difficulty in addition to ongoing coagulopathy after graft reperfusion. We report a case where we performed a left lateral sectionectomy instead of a right lobe modification.

CASE REPORT

A 44-year-old 58.4 kg female patient was admitted with drug-induced acute hepatic failure and underwent an emergency DDLT. The donor was a 51-year-old 60.0 kg man. At the time of procurement, the liver was noted to be hypertrophic. The estimated graft/recipient weight ratio was 3.49%. After completing the vascular and bile duct anastomosis, the abdomen could not be closed due to its large graft size. Because of the hypertrophic left lateral lobe and ongoing coagulopathy, we decided to perform an in situ left lateral sectionectomy rather than right posterior sectionectomy or right hemihepatectomy. The next day, the liver function failed to improve, and the patient's blood pressure began to decline gradually. Computed tomography showed severe inferior vena cava (IVC) compression by the graft, and the patient underwent transjugular IVC stent placement. Soon after, the patient's blood pressure improved and liver function gradually normalized. The patient was discharged uneventfully on postoperative day 45.

CONCLUSION

Under specific conditions, in situ left lateral sectionectomy is a solution for unexpected LFS graft during DDLT.

Extreme large-for-size syndrome after adult liver transplantation: A model for predicting a potentially lethal complication

There is currently no tool available to predict extreme large-for-size (LFS) syndrome, a potentially disastrous complication after adult liver transplantation (LT). We aimed to identify the risk factors for extreme LFS and to build a simple predictive model. A cohort of consecutive patients who underwent LT with full grafts in a single institution was studied. The extreme LFS was defined by the impossibility to achieve direct fascial closure, even after delayed management, associated with early allograft dysfunction or nonfunction. Computed tomography scan-based measurements of the recipient were done at the lower extremity of the xiphoid. After 424 LTs for 394 patients, extreme LFS occurred in 10 (2.4%) cases. The 90-day mortality after extreme LFS was 40.0% versus 6.5% in other patients (P = 0.003). In the extreme LFS group, the male donor-female recipient combination was more often observed (80.0% versus 17.4%; P < 0.001). The graft weight (GW)/right anteroposterior (RAP) distance ratio was predictive of extreme LFS with the highest area under the curve (area under the curve, 0.95). The optimal cutoff was 100 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 88%). The other ratios based on height, weight, body mass index, body surface area, and standard liver volume exhibited lower predictive performance. The final multivariate model included the male donor-female recipient combination and the GW/RAP. When the GW to RAP ratio increases from 80, 100, to 120, the probability of extreme LFS was 2.6%, 9.6%, and 29.1% in the male donor-female recipient combination, and <1%, 1.2%, and 4.5% in other combinations. In conclusion, the GW/RAP ratio predicts extreme LFS and may be helpful to avoid futile refusal for morphological reasons or to anticipate situation at risk, especially in female recipients. Liver Transplantation 23 1294-1304 2017 AASLD.

In Situ Posterior Graft Segmentectomy for Large-for-Size Syndrome in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation in Adults: A Case Report

Large-for-size syndrome (LFSS) is controversial in pediatric living donor liver transplantation patients and is associated with a poor graft outcome. Similar situations in deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in adults have not been reported frequently, and there are no official guidelines worldwide. Deceased donation is extremely limited in Japan, and when a larger liver is allocated for a very sick small recipient in Japan, transplantation with a plan to address LFSS might be necessary. The patient is a 58-year-old female patient who had acute liver failure with coma. The graft-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was 2.74%. Although the graft was enlarged by reperfusion, the intraoperative Doppler ultrasound, performed after reperfusion, showed sufficient graft in-flow and out-flow. However, when the liver graft was situated appropriately into the right phrenic space supported by the rib cage and diaphragm, the blood flow in the hepatic vein and portal vein was significantly reduced. Graft blood flow did not improve without removing it from the right subphrenic space. Therefore, we decided to perform an in situ graft posterior segmentectomy, so that the graft right lobe was properly accommodated in the patient's right subphrenic space. After the segmentectomy of the graft, an intraoperative Doppler sonogram showed significantly improved blood flow. LFSS could be a significant operative challenge in adult DDLT, especially in areas with limited chances of DDLT. In situ posterior segmentectomy in the demarcated area could be a solution for treating patients with LFSS.

Size mismatch in liver transplantation

Size mismatch is an unique and inevitable but critical issue in live donor liver transplantation. Unmatched metabolic demand of recipient as well as physiologic mismatch aggravates the damage to liver graft, inevitably leading to graft failure on recipient. Also, an excessive resection of liver graft for better recipient outcome in live donor liver transplant may jeopardize the healthy donor well-being and even put donor life in danger. There is a fine balance between resected graft volume required to meet the recipient's metabolic demand and residual graft volume required for donor safety. The obvious clinical necessity of finding that balance has prompted a clinical need and promoted the improvement of knowledge and development of management strategies for size-mismatched transplants. The development of the size-matching methodology has significantly improved graft outcome and recipient survival in live donor liver transplants. On the other hand, the effect of size mismatch in cadaveric transplants has never been observed as being so pronounced. The importance of matching of the donor recipient size has been unrecognized in cadaveric liver transplant. In this review, we attempt to summarize the current most updated knowledge on the subject, particularly addressing the definition and complications of size-mismatched cadaveric liver transplant, as well as management strategies.