Early Versus Delayed Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Interferon Maintenance in Multiple Myeloma: Single-Center Experience of 18 Years

First Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Recommendations From a Canadian Consensus Guideline Consortium

The availability of effective therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) has sparked debate on the role of first line autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), particularly in standard-risk patients. However, treatment for individuals with high-risk disease continues to display suboptimal outcomes. With novel therapies used earlier, practice is changing rapidly in the field of MM. Presently, quadruplet induction therapy incorporating an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody to a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug prior to ASCT followed by maintenance therapy stands as the foremost strategy for attaining deep and sustained responses in transplant eligible MM (TEMM). This Canadian Consensus Guideline Consortium (CGC) proposes consensus recommendations for the first line treatment of TEMM. To address the needs of physicians and people diagnosed with MM, this document focuses on ASCT eligibility, induction therapy, mobilization and collection, conditioning, consolidation, and maintenance therapy, as well as, high-risk populations, management of adverse events, assessment of treatment response, and monitoring for disease relapse. The CGC will periodically review the recommendations herein and update as necessary.

Upfront or Deferred Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Triplet and Quadruplet Induction and Minimal Residual Disease/Risk-Adapted Therapy

The standards of care for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT) include highly active triplet and quadruplet regimens based on proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies. These regimens are resulting in improved outcomes and increasingly high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses without HDM-ASCT as part of the upfront therapy. Furthermore, recent randomized studies have shown that, while transplant-based approaches as a frontline therapy result in significantly longer progression-free survival compared to non-transplant approaches, this has not translated into an overall survival benefit. Given these developments, and in the context of the treatment burden of undergoing HDM-ASCT, in addition to the acute toxicities and long-term sequelae of HDM, which are associated with the genotoxicity of melphalan, there is an increasing rationale for considering deferring upfront HDM-ASCT in select transplant-eligible patients and saving it as a treatment option for later salvage therapy. Here, we review the latest clinical trial data on upfront or deferred HDM-ASCT and on the activity of quadruplet induction regimens, including rates of MRD-negative responses, and summarize emerging treatment approaches in the upfront setting such as the use of MRD-directed therapy and alternatives to HDM-ASCT.

Long-Term Outcomes of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) for Multiple Myeloma: While New Horizons Emerge, It Is Still Only a Silver Lining for Resource-Constrained Settings

Background Significant hurdles impede the optimal implementation of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in low-middle income countries (LMICs). Herein, we highlight the challenges faced in LMICs while performing HSCT and report the long-term outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) who underwent autologous HSCT (AHSCT) at our center. Besides, we provide a comprehensive review of studies reporting long-term outcomes of AHSCT in MM from the Indian subcontinent. Methodology This study was conducted at the State Cancer Institute, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India. Case records of all patients with MM who received AHSCT from December 2010 to July 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. A non-systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Data regarding clinicopathological parameters and long-term follow-up were extracted from relevant studies and for patients included in our study. Results At our center, 47 patients (median age 52.0 years) with MM underwent AHSCT. Majority of patients had stage III disease (ISS) and median time to transplant was 11.5 months. The five-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 59.1% and 81.2%, respectively. Studies from the Indian subcontinent have observed a five-year OS of ~50% to ~85%. However, a greater variability in the five-year PFS has been reported, ranging from ~20% to ~75%. The median time to transplant has ranged from seven to 17 months (indicating time delays) with median CD34 cell counts of 2.7-6.3×106 cells/kg (lower than developed countries). Conclusions Despite significant resource limitations in LMICs, AHSCT is increasingly been performed in MM with encouraging long-term outcomes.

Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Time to Transplant on the Outcome

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a standard therapy for transplant eligible patients of multiple myeloma (MM). To evaluate impact of time to transplant on subsequent outcomes, we analyzed data on consecutive MM patients who received novel agents-based induction prior to transplant.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2019, 363 MM patients underwent ASCT. Patients' median age was 52 years, ranging from 20 to 72 years, 233 (64.2%) were males. Median interval from diagnosis to transplant was 11.5 months (range, 4-67.5); 201 (55.4%) patients underwent ASCT within 12 months (early) and 162 (44.6%) beyond 12 months since diagnosis (delayed ASCT). Primary objective was progression-free survival. Secondary objectives were-response rate to transplant, overall survival (OS), and transplant-related mortality (TRM).

RESULTS

Post-ASCT complete response (CR) (77.1% vs. 64.8%; P < .025) and CR+ very good partial response rate (89% vs. 81.5%; P < .03) was higher for early ASCT cohort. Engraftment characteristics, regimen-related toxicities, and day +100 TRM (3.5% vs 3.7%; P = .564) were similar in 2 cohorts. Median OS for early versus late cohort from date of diagnosis is 127.0 (95% CI, 98.9-155.1) versus 104.5 months (95% CI, 79.3-129.6; P = .356) and from date of transplant is 119.0 (95% CI, 93.4-144.6) versus 89.5 months (95% CI, 57.4-121.6), P < .02. Median PFS is better for early transplant cohort; 69.5 (95% CI, 56.7-82.3) versus 50.0 months (95% CI, 35.6-64.4), P < .05, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Early transplant for myeloma is associated with higher response rate and better progression-free survival.

Trends in autologous stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Changing demographics and outcomes in European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centres from 1995 to 2019

Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for 10% of haematological malignancies. Overall survival (OS) has improved in recent years due to increased use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment of newly diagnosed MM and the advent of novel agents, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs and monoclonal antibodies. To assess trends in ASCT including patient selection, choice of induction regimen, depth of response and survival, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing first ASCT for MM in European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centres between 1995 and 2019. A total of 117 711 patients across 575 centres were included. The number of transplants performed increased sevenfold across the study period. The median age increased from 55 to 61 years, and the percentage of patients aged >65 years rose from 7% to 30%. Use of chemotherapy-based induction fell significantly, being largely replaced by bortezomib-based regimens. The two-year complete response rate increased from 22% to 42%. The five-year progression-free survival and OS rates increased from 28% to 31% and from 52% to 69%, respectively. Transplant mortality fell from 5.9% to 1.5%. Ongoing advances in MM treatment may challenge the future role of ASCT. However, at the current time, ASCT remains central to the MM treatment paradigm.

Management of Patients With Hematologic Malignancies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Practical Considerations and Lessons to Be Learned

The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented hurdles to the delivery of care to patients with cancer. Patients with hematologic malignancies appear to have a greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe disease due to myelosuppression and lymphopenia. The first challenge, therefore, is how to continue to deliver effective, curative therapy to vulnerable patients and at the same time avoid exposing them, and their health care teams (HCT), to SARS-CoV-2. An additional challenge is the timely completion of the diagnostic and staging studies required to formulate appropriate treatment plans. Deferred procedures and avoidance of multiple trips to the surgical, diagnostic, and laboratory suites require same day consolidation of all procedures. With laboratory medicine absorbed by the need to deploy large scale COVID-testing, the availability of routine molecular tests is affected. Finally, we are increasingly faced with the challenge of making complex treatment decisions in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with aggressive but potentially curable blood cancers. When to treat, how to treat, when to wait, how long to wait, how to predict and manage toxicities, and how to avoid compromising cure rates remains unknown. We present an outline of the scientific, medical, and operational challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic at selected American and European institutions and offer our current view of the key elements of a response. While the peak of the pandemic may be past us, in the absence of a vaccine risks remain, and our alertness and response to future challenges need to be refined and consolidated.

Outcomes with early vs. deferred stem cell transplantation in light chain amyloidosis

In the presence of effective treatment options for systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is sometimes deferred after stem cell collection. We designed this retrospective study to compare overall survival (OS) between patients who proceed directly to ASCT after stem cell collection and those who defer ASCT. We included patients with AL amyloidosis who had stem cell collection at Mayo Clinic, Minnesota, from 2004 to 2018. ASCT was considered "early" if performed within 90 days of collection, and "deferred" if performed after 90 days, or not done by last follow up. We included 651 patients; 527 underwent early ASCT and 124 deferred ASCT. There was no difference in OS with early vs. deferred ASCT (median OS: 13.0 vs. 11.4 years, respectively, P = 0.28). There was no difference in OS between the 2 groups among patients with early or advanced Mayo Stage. Among patients who achieved ≥very good partial response at the time of collection, OS in the early and deferred groups was 14.2 and 13.4 years, respectively (P = 0.06). Survival outcomes are similar with early and deferred ASCT. Further studies are needed to identify patients who would benefit from each approach.

Multiple Myeloma in the Time of COVID-19

We provide our recommendations (not evidence based) for managing multiple myeloma patients during the pandemic of COVID-19. We do not recommend therapy for smoldering myeloma patients (standard or high risk). Screening for COVID-19 should be done in all patients before therapy. For standard-risk patients, we recommend the following: ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IRd) (preferred), cyclophosphamide lenalidomide and dexamethasone (CRd), daratumumab lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd), lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd), or cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD). For high-risk patients we recommend carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) (preferred) or RVd. Decreasing the dose of dexamethasone to 20 mg and giving bortezomib subcutaneously once a week is recommended. We recommend delaying autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), unless the patient has high-risk disease that is not responding well, or if the patient has plasma cell leukemia (PCL). Testing for COVID-19 should be done before ASCT. If a patient achieves a very good partial response or better, doses and frequency of drug administration can be modified. After 10–12 cycles, lenalidomide maintenance is recommended for standard-risk patients and bortezomib or ixazomib are recommended for high-risk patients. Daratumumab-based regimens are recommended for relapsed patients. Routine ASCT is not recommended for relapse during the epidemic unless the patient has an aggressive relapse or secondary PCL. Patients on current maintenance should continue their therapy.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for blood cancers in the era of precision medicine and immunotherapy

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) has been an integral component in the treatment of many hematologic malignancies. Since the development of HCT nearly 50 years ago, the role of this modality has evolved as newer treatment approaches have been developed and integrated into the standard of care. In the last decade, novel and highly active targeted therapies and immunotherapies have been approved for many hematologic malignancies, raising the question of whether HCT continues to retain its prominent role in the treatment paradigms of various hematologic malignancies. In this review, the authors have described the current role of autologous and allogeneic HCT in the treatment of patients with acute leukemias, aggressive B-cell lymphomas, and multiple myeloma and discussed how novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies have changed the potential need, timing, and goal of HCT in patients with these diseases.

Multiple myeloma: Role of autologous transplantation

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been the mainstay of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment for approximately 30 years. Although the continuous introduction of novel agents in the armamentarium against MM has questioned its value, ASCT remains a backbone treatment for fit MM patients. However, there is no unanimous approach for several aspects including the positioning of ASCT in the therapeutic algorithm either upfront or following the first relapse, the need for single or tandem ASCT, as well as the role of ASCT as salvage therapy. Furthermore, the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies along with the next generation proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs provide a platform for optimizing the induction and consolidation/maintenance regimens. In this review, we present current data pertaining to all aspects of ASCT in MM, whereas we highlight the open issues that should be addressed in the design of future clinical trials in the field.

Pros and cons of frontline autologous transplant in multiple myeloma: the debate over timing

The treatment landscape for multiple myeloma has dramatically changed over the past decade with the introduction of several new classes of drugs, which are very effective at controlling the disease for prolonged periods of time, especially when used in multidrug combinations. Prior to the advent of these new agents, peripheral blood autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was the mainstay of therapy for patients who were eligible to undergo the procedure, with deep and durable responses in the majority of patients. Despite the introduction of more effective therapies, ASCT continues to play an important role in overall management of younger patients, where it has been integrated with the other therapeutic approaches to provide maximum benefit. Recent phase 3 trials have once again confirmed the survival benefit associated with ASCT in myeloma. Retrospective studies have also demonstrated the feasibility of using ASCT at the time of first relapse rather than as a component of the initial treatment. Significant geographical variations exist in the use of ASCT, especially between the United States and Europe in terms of its use as part of upfront therapy. Much of these differences are driven by the availability of drugs and drug combinations for initial therapy of myeloma as well as maintenance approaches post-ASCT. It is amply clear from these trials that ASCT will continue to play an important role in management of myeloma and is likely to be used as a platform for enhancing the efficacy of other treatment modalities that are currently in development.

The evolution of stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

Autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an integral part of treatment for previously untreated, and may have value in the treatment of relapsed patients with, multiple myeloma (MM). The addition of novel agents like immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors as induction therapy before and as consolidation/maintenance therapy after ASCT has led to an improvement in complete response (CR) rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). With advances in supportive care, older patients and patients with renal insufficiency are now able to safely undergo the procedure. The data concerning the timing of ASCT (early in the disease course or at first relapse), single versus tandem (double) ASCT and the role and duration of consolidation and maintenance therapy post ASCT remain conflicting. This review aims to discuss the evolution of stem-cell transplant over the past 3 decades and its current role in the context of newer, safer and more effective therapeutic agents.

Single-center Experience in Treating Patients With t(4;14) Multiple Myeloma With and Without Planned Frontline Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Translocation t(4;14) has traditionally been classified as a high-risk cytogenetic feature in patients with multiple myeloma with shortened progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) despite initial response to treatment. Recent data have shown an improved long-term survival in these patients treated with novel agents, such as bortezomib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on our patients with t(4;14) multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib-based induction between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2014 to assess the real-world outcomes of these patients in a tertiary center.

RESULTS

Among the 75 patients analyzed, the median PFS was 33.5 months, and the median OS was 69.6 months after a median follow-up of 41 months. Even in the era of novel agents, patients who received frontline autologous stem cell transplant had a better PFS than those who received chemotherapy alone (median PFS, 24.2 months vs. 41.5 months; P = .01). Hypercalcemia at the time of presentation was found to be a significant predictor of progression (hazard ratio [HR], 10.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-26.0) and death (HR, 9.4; 95% CI, 3.2-27.8), and co-harboring of del(17p) by fluorescent in situ hybridization with t(4;14) was associated with a significantly inferior OS (HR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.4-11.4).

CONCLUSION

Even in the era of novel agents, t(4;14) remains a negative prognostic marker. Frontline autologous stem cell transplant remains as an essential tool when treating these high-risk patients, but further prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the most effective strategy for this patient group.