Good Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation With Deceased Donor With Acute Kidney Injury: Donor's Age and Not Acute Kidney Injury Predicts Graft Function

Kidney Transplantation in Patients With aHUS: A Comparison of Eculizumab Prophylaxis Versus Rescue Therapy

BACKGROUND

Guidelines advise eculizumab prophylaxis for most kidney transplant recipients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). However, recurrence rates may be overestimated, and starting eculizumab at relapse ("rescue therapy") may prevent graft loss. Randomized controlled trials have not compared the efficacy, safety, and costs of different treatment strategies. We performed a comparative study, including a previously described Dutch cohort treated with rescue therapy and a UK cohort using eculizumab prophylaxis.

METHODS

In the Netherlands, we selected all adult patients with aHUS who received a kidney transplant between 2010 and 2021 in the Radboud University Medical Center (n = 30) and enriched this cohort with 8 patients who received rescue therapy in other centers. The UK cohort included all adult patients with aHUS at moderate or high risk of recurrence, transplanted between 2013 and 2017 with prophylactic eculizumab.

RESULTS

We included 38 Dutch patients and 35 UK patients. Characteristics were comparable, although the UK cohort included more patients with a complement factor H SCR20 mutation or hybrid gene (31% versus 5%; P < 0.01), and more Dutch patients received living donor kidneys (66% versus 20%; P < 0.001). Follow-up was comparable (the Dutch patients 70.8 mo, range, 10-134; UK patients 55.4 mo, range, 2-95). Eighteen (47%) Dutch patients received rescue therapy. Death-censored graft survival was not significantly different (the Dutch patients 1 y, 3 y, and 6 y: 97.4%, 91.2%, and 87.1%, respectively; UK patients 1 y, 3 y, and 6 y: 97.1%, 88.2%, and 65.6%, respectively, log-rank P = 0.189).

CONCLUSIONS

In a population characterized by low prevalence of "very high risk" genes, who were predominantly transplanted using an endothelial protective regime, death-censored graft survival with eculizumab rescue therapy was not inferior to prophylaxis.

Eculizumab Rescue Therapy in Patients with Recurrent Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome After Kidney Transplantation

Introduction

Since 2016, kidney transplantation in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in the Netherlands is performed without eculizumab prophylaxis. Eculizumab is given in case of posttransplant aHUS recurrence. Eculizumab therapy is monitored in the CUREiHUS study.

Methods

All participating kidney transplant patients who received eculizumab therapy for a suspected posttransplant aHUS recurrence were evaluated. Overall recurrence rate was monitored prospectively at Radboud University Medical Center.

Results

In the period from January 2016 until October 2020, we included 15 (12 females, 3 males; median age 42 years, range 24-66 years) patients with suspected aHUS recurrence after kidney transplantation in this study. The time interval to recurrence showed a bimodal distribution. Seven patients presented early after transplantation (median 3 months, range 0.3-8.8 months), with typical aHUS features: rapid loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and laboratory signs of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Eight patients presented late (median 46 months, range 18-69 months) after transplantation. Of these, only 3 patients had systemic TMA, whereas 5 patients presented with slowly deteriorating eGFR without systemic TMA. Treatment with eculizumab resulted in improvement or stabilization of eGFR in 14 patients. Eculizumab discontinuation was tried in 7 patients; however, it was successful only in 3. At the end of the follow-up (median 29 months, range 3-54 months after start of eculizumab), 6 patients had eGFR <30 ml/min per 1.73 m². Graft loss had occurred in 3 of them. Overall, aHUS recurrence rate without eculizumab prophylaxis was 23%.

Conclusions

Rescue treatment of posttransplant aHUS recurrence is effective; however, some patients suffer from irreversible loss of kidney function, likely caused by delayed diagnosis and treatment and/or too aggressive discontinuation of eculizumab. Physicians should be aware that recurrence of aHUS can present without evidence of systemic TMA.

Urine Injury Biomarkers Are Not Associated With Kidney Transplant Failure

BACKGROUND

Kidneys transplanted from deceased donors with serum creatinine-defined acute kidney injury (AKI) have similar allograft survival as non-AKI kidneys but are discarded at a higher rate. Urine injury biomarkers are sensitive markers of structural kidney damage and may more accurately predict graft outcomes.

METHODS

In the 2010-2013 multicenter Deceased Donor Study of 2430 kidney transplant recipients from 1298 donors, we assessed the association of donor urine injury biomarkers microalbumin, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, kidney injury molecule-1, IL-18, and liver-type fatty acid binding protein with graft failure (GF) and death-censored GF (dcGF) using Cox proportional hazard models (median follow-up 4 y). We examined if serum creatinine-defined donor AKI modified this association to assess the relationship between subclinical donor AKI (elevated biomarkers without creatinine-defined AKI) and GF. Through chart review of a subcohort (1137 recipients), we determined associations between donor injury biomarkers and a 3-year composite outcome of GF, mortality, or estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 20mL/min/1.73m.

RESULTS

Risk of GF, dcGF, and 3-year composite outcome did not vary with donor injury biomarker concentrations after adjusting for donor, transplant, and recipient characteristics (adjusted hazard ratio ranged from 0.96 to 1.01 per log-2 increase in biomarker). Subclinical injury in transplanted kidneys without AKI was not associated with GF.

CONCLUSIONS

AKI measured using injury biomarkers was not associated with posttransplant graft outcomes (at median 4 y posttransplant). When assessing posttransplant graft viability, clinicians can prioritize other donor and recipient factors over donor kidney injury, measured by either serum creatinine or urine injury biomarkers.

A Review of Donor Acute Kidney Injury and Posttransplant Outcomes

Although over 90 000 people are on the kidney transplant waitlist in the United States, some kidneys that are viable for transplantation are discarded. Transplant surgeons are more likely to discard deceased donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) versus without AKI (30% versus 18%). AKI is defined using changes in creatinine from baseline. Transplant surgeons can use DonorNet data, including admission, peak, and terminal serum creatinine, and biopsy data when available to differentiate kidneys with AKI from those with chronic injury. Although chronic kidney disease is associated with reduced graft survival, an abundance of literature has demonstrated similar graft survival for deceased donors with AKI versus donors without AKI. Donors with AKI are more likely to undergo delayed graft function but have similar long-term outcomes as donors without AKI. The mechanism for similar graft survival is unclear. Some hypothesized mechanisms include (1) ischemic preconditioning; (2) posttransplant and host factors playing a greater role in long-term survival than donor factors; and (3) selection bias of transplanting only relatively healthy donor kidneys with AKI. Existing literature suggests transplanting more donor kidneys with stage 1 and 2 AKI, and cautious utilization of stage 3 AKI donors, may increase the pool of viable kidneys. Doing so can reduce the number of people who die on the waitlist by over 500 every year.

Should we use kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury for renal transplantation?

The scarcity of donor organs for transplant results in long waiting times for kidney transplantation and low transplant rate worldwide. Utilization of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the strategies that has attracted attention recently. This article reviewed the outcomes of transplanted renal allografts from donors with acute kidney injury. Key findings about the transplant outcomes included a higher incidence of delayed graft function and primary non function, but respectable outcomes in the context of similar acute rejection rates, and graft function and graft survival. Against this background and with evidence of high mortality for patients remaining on waiting list of transplant, we advocate consideration of AKI donors for kidney transplantation.

Kidney transplantation with donors in severe acute kidney injury. Should we use these organs? Retrospective Case Series

INTRODUCTION

The number of incident and prevalent patients on dialysis has increased, as well as the number of candidates for renal transplantation in Brazil, without a proportional increase in the number of organ donors. The use of expanded kidneys, as to renal function, may be an alternative to increase the supply of organs.

OBJECTIVE

to discuss the feasibility of using expanded kidneys for renal function, which are in severe acute renal injury.

METHODS

All cases of renal transplantation of deceased donors performed at the Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu of UNESP, from January 2010 to June 2018, totaling 732 cases were evaluated. Cases with final donor creatinine greater than 6 mg/dL were selected.

RESULTS

four patients were selected, of whom all donors were in severe acute kidney injury (AKI). These donors presented rhabdomyolysis as a probable cause of severe AKI, were young, with no comorbidities and had decreased urinary volume in the last 24 hours. The clinical evolution of all the recipients was satisfactory, with a glomerular filtration rate after transplantation ranging from 48 to 98 mL/min/1.73 m2.

CONCLUSION

this series of cases shows the possibility of using renal donors in severe AKI, provided the following are respected: donor age, rhabdomyolysis as the cause of AKI, and implantation-favorable biopsy findings. Additional studies with better designs, larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up times are needed.

Predictors of Acute Kidney Injury in Deceased Kidney Donors After Brain Death

BACKGROUND

Donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) are generally accepted as a valuable source of kidneys for transplant. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of developing AKI based on deceased kidney donor parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 162 kidneys procured from deceased donors after brain death were collected. These included clinical characteristics of donors and histologic assessment in organ biopsy specimens. The donors' kidney terminal function was classified according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. All biopsies were performed with the use of a 16G automatic needle, and the 20-mm tissue specimen was available in all cases. Biopsy specimens were secured and prepared in a routine way with hematoxylin and eosin. The presence of chronic changes was analyzed according to the Banff 2009 classification by 1 experienced nephropathologist. The logistic regression model was used to assess the risk of AKI regarding donor characteristics and histologic findings.

RESULTS

There were 50 kidneys (30.9%) with AKI identified. The risk of AKI increased with donor age (P = .002; odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), body mass index (P = .003; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09), and male sex (P = .001; OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.31-2.27). Regarding the histologic findings, the interstitial fibrosis presence was a risk factor of AKI (P = .004; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Older donor age, male sex, higher body mass index, and presence of interstitial fibrosis in kidney graft biopsy specimen are risk factors of AKI.

Factors of Acute Kidney Injury Donors Affecting Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation From Deceased Donors

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) from deceased acute kidney injury (AKI) donors and analyzed the factors affecting these outcomes.

METHODS

All patients who underwent KT from deceased donors at our institution from 1998 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Recipients were divided into the AKI and non-AKI donor groups. We analyzed delayed graft function (DGF), serum creatinine levels at 1 month and 1 year after KT, cold ischemia time, donors' initial and terminal serum creatinine levels, Kidney Donor Profile Index, and patient and graft survival in each group.

RESULTS

Of 181 recipients, 30 received kidneys from 21 AKI donors, whereas the remaining 151 received kidneys from donors without AKI. DGF more frequently developed in the AKI donor group than in the non-AKI donor group (40% vs 7.28%; P = .001). Allograft functions at 1 month and 1 year after KT did not differ between the AKI and non-AKI donor groups (1 month: P = .469; 1 year: P = .691). Factors affecting DGF were recipient weight and donor AKI. Recipient factors affecting graft function at 1 year were recipient height, length of hospital stay, serum creatinine levels at 1 month and 6 months, and biopsy-proven acute rejection. Older donor age was the only donor factor that affected graft function at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

KT from deceased AKI donors showed a higher DGF rate but favorable patient and graft survival and graft functions. Donor AKI and recipient weight affected DGF, and only older donor age affected graft function at 1 year.

Single kidney transplantation from donors with acute kidney injury: A single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

Despite a severe shortage of organ supply, patients are reluctant to accept organs from deceased donors with AKI, let alone from pediatric AKI donors.

METHODS

We assessed 70 patients who received kidneys from donors with AKI (10 with pediatric and 60 with adult donors) and 176 contemporaneous patients who received kidneys from non-AKI donors (41 with pediatric and 135 with adult donors) between March 2012 and February 2017 for retrospectively evaluating the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

AKI was defined and staging by the RIFLE criteria and pediatric-modified RIFLE criteria. Median age was 11.00 years IQR (4.50-14.00 years), and median weight was 25.00 kg (IQR, 17.00-45.00 kg) for all pediatric donors. Median follow-up was 8 months (range, 1-49 months). Adult AKI group had the highest incidence of DGF (35.0% vs 10%, 9.8%, and 19.3%, P = 0.011). There was a significant increase in DGF in higher AKI stages (Risk: 20.7%, Injury: 46.7%, Failure: 50.0%; P = 0.014) among patients with adult donors. No significant differences were noted in 1-year (100.0%, 95.1%, 98.3%, and 97.8%; P = 0.751) and 3-year (100.0%, 95.1%, 98.3%, and 97.8%; P = 0.751) patient survival, and 1-year (90.0%, 97.6%, 98.3%, and 95.6%; P = 0.535) and 3-year (90.0%, 97.6%, 98.3%, and 95.6%; P = 0.535) graft survival.

CONCLUSION

Transplants procured from donors with AKI, particularly pediatric ones, could achieve excellent intermediate-term clinical outcomes and thus potentially expand the donor pool.

Successful transplantation of kidneys from deceased donors with terminal acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND

There are many doubts with regards to accepting deceased kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) for transplantation.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to present the 5-years outcome of kidney transplantation cases where deceased donors developed AKI before organ procurement.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty-six deceased renal transplants were analyzed. Data regarding donors and recipients were collected. Terminal AKI was defined as terminal serum creatinine concentration higher than 1.99 mg/dL and 66 such cases were diagnosed. All kidney transplant recipients were followed for 60 months.

RESULTS

AKI group presented more episodes of delayed graft function (DGF) compared to the non-AKI group (56% vs 35%, p < .05). No differences were observed between the groups in the rate of acute rejection episodes, kidney function as well as patient and graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplants with AKI present more often DGF and comparable graft survival to transplants without AKI. Kidneys with AKI can be a valuable source of organs provided attentive selection and appropriate care of deceased donors.

Evaluation of the 1000 renal transplants carried out at the University Hospital of the Botucatu Medical School (HCFMB) - UNESP and their evolution over the years

INTRODUCTION

The progress in kidney transplantation has been evident over the years, as well as its benefits for patients.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the 1.000 kidney transplants performed at the Botucatu Medical School University Hospital, subdividing the patients in different periods, according to the current immunosuppression, and evaluating the differences in graft and patient survival.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of the transplants performed between 06/17/87 to 07/31/16, totaling 1,046 transplants, subdivided into four different periods: 1) 1987 to 2000: cyclosporine with azathioprine; 2) 2001 to 2006: cyclosporine with mycophenolate; 3) 2007 to 2014: tacrolimus with antimetabolic; and 4) 2015 to 2016: tacrolimus with antimetabolic, with increased use of the combination of tacrolimus and mTOR inhibitors.

RESULTS

There was an increase in the mean age of recipients and increase in deceased donors and their age in the last two periods. There was a reduction in graft function delay, being 54.3% in the fourth period, compared to 78.8% in the first, p = 0.002. We found a reduction in acute rejection, being 6.1% in the last period compared to 36.3% in the first, p = 0.001. Urological complications and diabetes after transplantation were more frequent in the first two periods. The rates of cytomegalovirus infection were higher in the last two periods. There was an improvement in graft survival, p = 0.003. There was no difference in patient survival, p = 0.77 (Figure 2).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant increase in the number of transplants, with evolution in graft survival, despite the worsening in the profiles of recipients and donors.