Predictive Factors of Acute Rejection in Low Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Basiliximab

Induction Therapy and Therapeutic Antibodies

Prevention of allograft rejection is one of the crucial goals in solid organ transplantation to ensure durability of the graft and is chiefly mediated by cellular and humoral pathways targeting cell surface alloantigens. The risk of rejection is highest in the first post-transplant year and wanes with time albeit the risk always exists and varies with the type of organ transplanted. Induction therapies refer to the use of high-intensity immunosuppression in the immediate post-operative period to mitigate the highest risk of rejection. This term encompasses chiefly the use of antibody therapies directed against one of the key pathways in T-cell activation or abrogating effects of circulating alloantibodies. These antibodies carry more potent immunomodulatory effect than maintenance immunosuppressive therapy alone and many of them lead to durable immune cell depletion. A variety of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies have been utilized for use not only for induction therapy, but also for treatment of allograft rejection when it occurs and as components of desensitization therapy before and after transplantation to modulate circulating alloantibodies.

Tacrolimus Trough Intravariability in Patients Treated With the Prolonged-Release Formulation Is a Risk Factor for Acute Graft Rejection

OBJECTIVES

Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, and lack of adherence to the therapeutic regimen is a main risk factor for acute graft rejection; hence, the prolonged-release formulation was created. A high intrapatient variability for tacrolimus trough levels has been associated with worse graft outcomes; therefore, we investigated the correlation between the tacrolimus variation coefficient and the development of biopsy-proven acute graft rejection in kidney transplant patients with typical maintenance immunosuppression versus the prolonged-release formulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center observational retrospective study that included all adult kidney transplants from deceased donors between January 2011 and December 2014 for which the transplant recipients were given maintenance therapy with tacrolimus prolonged-release formulation (Advagraf). The overall tacrolimus variation coefficient was calculated for the follow-up period from transplant until December 2019. Biopsy-proven acute graft rejection results were collected throughout follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software.

RESULTS

The study was composed of 147 patients with a mean follow-up time of 60.4 ± 15 months. The mean age of the patients was 47.5 ± 11.9 years and 67.3% were men. Of these 147 patients, 29 had at least 1 episode of acute graft rejection during follow-up. There was a significant correlation between patients with a higher tacrolimus variation coefficient and the presence of biopsy-proven acute graft rejection. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine an intrapatient variability cutoff point of 28.3% for tacrolimus. Younger patients were also more likely than older patients to develop acute graft rejection in our sample.

CONCLUSIONS

High intrapatient variability of tacrolimus trough levels is a risk factor for acute graft rejection in kidney transplant patients.

Pretransplant Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody in the Absence of Donor-Specific Antibody and Kidney Allograft Survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Panel reactive antibody informs the likelihood of finding an HLA-compatible donor for transplant candidates, but has historically been associated with acute rejection and allograft survival because testing methods could not exclude the presence of concomitant donor-specific antibodies. Despite new methods to exclude donor-specific antibodies, panel reactive antibody continues to be used to determine the choice of induction and maintenance immunosuppression. The study objective was to determine the clinical relevance of panel reactive antibody in the absence of donor-specific antibodies.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Retrospective observational study of kidney allograft survival among 4058 zero HLA-A-, B-, DR-, and DQB1-mismatched transplant recipients without antibodies to donor kidney antigens encoded by these HLA gene loci.

RESULTS

Among 4058 first and repeat transplant recipients, patients with calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) 1%-97% were not at higher risk of transplant failure, compared with patients with cPRA of 0% (death censored graft loss: hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.41). Patients with cPRA ≥98% had a higher risk of graft loss from any cause including death (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.79) and death censored allograft failure (hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.49). In stratified analyses, the higher risk of graft loss among patients with cPRA ≥98% was only observed among repeat, but not first, transplant recipients. In subgroup analysis, there was no association between cPRA and graft loss among living related transplant recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Calculated panel reactive antibody is poorly associated with post-transplant immune reactivity to the allograft in the absence of donor-specific antibody.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2021_01_25_CJN13640820_final.mp3.

Outcomes of induction antibody therapies in the nonbroadly sensitized adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort registry analysis

The outcomes of lymphocyte-depleting antibody induction therapy (LDAIT), [thymoglobulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab (ALM)] versus interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2RA) in the nonbroadly-sensitized [pretransplant calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA), <80%] adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (adult-DDKTRs) are understudied. In this registry, study of 55 593 adult-DD-KTRs, outcomes of LDAIT [(ATG, N = 32 985) and (ALM, N = 9429)], and IL-2RA (N = 13 179) in <10% and 10-79% cPRA groups was analyzed. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of one-year biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was lower; while, aOR of 1-year composite of re-hospitalization, graft loss, or death was higher with LDAIT than IL2-RA in both cPRA groups. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of delayed graft function was higher with LDAIT than IL-2RA in the <10% cPRA group. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 5-year death-censored graft loss (DCGL) in both <80% cPRA groups seemed higher with ALM than other inductions [(<10% cPRA: ALM versus IL2RA, aHR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.00-1.23 and ATG versus ALM: aHR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.77-0.91; 10-79% cPRA: ALM versus IL2RA, aHR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.64; and ATG versus ALM, aHR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70-0.98)]. Five-year aHR of death did not differ among induction therapies in both cPRA groups. In nonbroadly sensitized adult-DDKTRs, LDAIT is more protective against 1-year BPAR (not 5-year mortality) than IL-2RA; the trend of a higher 5-year DCGL risk with ALM than ATG or IL-2RA needs further investigation.