Right Accessory Hepatic Artery Arising From Celiac Trunk-Case Report of a Variation that Must Be Looked for During Multiorgan Procurement

Rare combined variations of renal, suprarenal, phrenic and accessory hepatic arteries

Knowledge of the morphological variations within the abdominal cavity is significant for all medical practitioners planning surgery. This report presents the rare origin of a common trunk for the right inferior phrenic artery, and superior and inferior suprarenal artery from the right renal artery. An accessory hepatic artery was found, which served as a branch of the right inferior phrenic artery. The diameter of the common trunk was 3.95 mm, and the diameters of the inferior and superior suprarenal arteries were 1.84 and 1.36 mm, respectively. The diameter of the right inferior phrenic artery was 2.55 mm. Both the embryological background and the potential clinical significance of this morphological variation are discussed. Knowledge of this common trunk and the occurrence of the accessory right hepatic artery may be of significance in diagnostic and surgical procedures.

Rare anatomic variation of the right hepatic artery and accessory right hepatic artery supplying hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Each hepatic artery is functionally essential for providing blood supply to the liver, and so are variant arteries. Variant arteries, including the accessory right hepatic artery (ARHA) and replaced right hepatic artery (RRHA) are commonly described in the literature. However, they usually occur independently. Here, we report an extremely rare case that involved both an ARHA and an RRHA arising from the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA), respectively. To date, this situation has never been reported in the literature.They were preoperatively identified during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination in a 69-year-old male patient with hepatocellular carcinoma. And they were further verified by following conventional angiography for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the patient. In addition, the patient's tumor was primarily supplied by these 2 variant arteries. After the successful TACE procedure, the patient had a well postoperative recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

By analyzing this case and performing a systematic review of the literature, the important clinical implications of the ARHA and RRHA will be investigated and discussed. Main lessons learned from this case thorough understanding of the normal anatomy of the hepatic artery and its anatomic variation is crucial for surgeons and interventional radiologists; preoperative computed tomography, MRI, and intraoperative angiography play an important role in detecting the variant hepatic artery; identifying these anomalous hepatic arteries before operation can effectively avoid unintentional injury during surgery, such as massive hemorrhage or hepatic infarction.

A rare anastomosis between the common hepatic artery and the superior mesenteric artery: a case report

For decades, anastomoses between unpaired branches of the abdominal aorta have attracted the attention of anatomists, surgeons and radiologists, due to their significance in many clinical procedures. This report presents a rare anastomosis between the common hepatic artery and the superior mesenteric artery, which gave off three branches to the jejunum. The diameter of the anastomosis measured at the point of its branching off the common hepatic artery and at the level of union with the superior mesenteric artery was 4.46 and 4.19 mm, respectively. Moreover, the anastomosis gave off the branch to the head of the pancreas. Both embryological background and potential clinical implications of this variation are discussed. Knowledge of these vascular connections may be important for diagnostic and surgical procedures.