Impact of Portal Hemodynamic Changes in Partial Liver Grafts on Short-Term Graft Regeneration in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Volumetric graft changes after liver transplantation: evidence of adaptation to recipient body size

It is believed that whole liver grafts adjust their size to fit the body size of the recipient after transplantation, despite a lack of evidence. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis. This was a retrospective cohort study of 113 liver transplantations performed at Karolinska University Hospital. The cohort was divided based on graft volume-to-standard liver volume ratio (GV/SLV) into quartiles of small, mid, and large grafts. Serial volumetric assessment was performed on the day of transplantation and at posttransplant check-ups early (<2 mo) and late (9-13 mo) after transplantation using computed tomography (CT) volumetry. Change in GV/SLV ratio over time was analyzed with ANOVA repeated measures. A multiple regression model was used to investigate the influence of intraoperative blood flow, recipient body size, age, and relative sickness on graft volume changes. Between the three time points, mean GV/SLV ratio adapted to 0.55-0.94-1.00 in small grafts (n = 29, P < 0.001); 0.87-1.18-1.13 in midgrafts (n = 56, P < 0.001); 1.11-1.51-1.18 in large grafts (n = 28, P < 0.001). Regression analysis showed a positive correlation between posttransplant graft growth and portal flow (β = 1.18, P = 0.005), arterial flow (β = 0.17, P = 0.001), and recipient body surface area (β = 59.85, P < 0.001). A negative correlation was observed for graft weight-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR; β = -33.12, P < 0.001). Grafts with initial GV/SLV-ratio < 0.6 adapt toward the ideal volume for recipient body size 1 year after transplantation. The disparity between graft size relative to recipient body size, and the portal and arterial perfusion, influence volumetric graft changes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first and largest human study to verify the hypothesis that whole liver grafts adjust their size to match recipient body size 1 year after transplantation-a phenomenon that has previously only been observed in experimental animal studies and human case reports. The direction of volumetric changes is driven by the disparity between graft size relative to recipient body surface area and weight, as well as the intraoperative portal- and arterial graft perfusion.

Critical Role of LSEC in Post-Hepatectomy Liver Regeneration and Failure

Liver sinusoids are lined by liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC), which represent approximately 15 to 20% of the liver cells, but only 3% of the total liver volume. LSEC have unique functions, such as fluid filtration, blood vessel tone modulation, blood clotting, inflammatory cell recruitment, and metabolite and hormone trafficking. Different subtypes of liver endothelial cells are also known to control liver zonation and hepatocyte function. Here, we have reviewed the origin of LSEC, the different subtypes identified in the liver, as well as their renewal during homeostasis. The liver has the exceptional ability to regenerate from small remnants. The past decades have seen increasing awareness in the role of non-parenchymal cells in liver regeneration despite not being the most represented population. While a lot of knowledge has emerged, clarification is needed regarding the role of LSEC in sensing shear stress and on their participation in the inductive phase of regeneration by priming the hepatocytes and delivering mitogenic factors. It is also unclear if bone marrow-derived LSEC participate in the proliferative phase of liver regeneration. Similarly, data are scarce as to LSEC having a role in the termination phase of the regeneration process. Here, we review what is known about the interaction between LSEC and other liver cells during the different phases of liver regeneration. We next explain extended hepatectomy and small liver transplantation, which lead to "small for size syndrome" (SFSS), a lethal liver failure. SFSS is linked to endothelial denudation, necrosis, and lobular disturbance. Using the knowledge learned from partial hepatectomy studies on LSEC, we expose several techniques that are, or could be, used to avoid the "small for size syndrome" after extended hepatectomy or small liver transplantation.

A systematic review of small for size syndrome after major hepatectomy and liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Major hepatectomy (MH) and particular types of liver transplantation (LT) (reduced size graft, living-donor and split-liver transplantation) lead to a reduction in liver mass. As the portal venous return remains the same it results in a reciprocal and proportionate rise in portal venous pressure potentially resulting in small for size syndrome (SFSS). The aim of this study was to review the incidence, diagnosis and management of SFSS amongst recipients of LT and MH.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the 2010 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The following terms were used to search PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library in July 2019: ("major hepatectomy" or "liver resection" or "liver transplantation") AND ("small for size syndrome" or "post hepatectomy liver failure"). The primary outcome was a diagnosis of SFSS.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria and could be included in this review. In total 2728 patients were included of whom 316 (12%) patients met criteria for SFSS or post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Of these, 31 (10%) fulfilled criteria for PHLF following MH. 8 of these patients developed intractable ascites alongside elevated portal venous pressure following MH indicative of SFSS.

CONCLUSION

SFSS is under-recognised following major hepatectomy and should be considered as an underlying cause of PHLF. Surgical and pharmacological therapies are available to reduce portal congestion and reverse SFSS.

Designing Triple Adult Liver Grafts From an Ideal Deceased Liver

Splitting deceased donor livers and creating 3 grafts from a whole liver may be feasible and shorten the waiting time for organ donation in patients with high mortality rates. We hypothesized that it might be reasonable to procure 3 grafts for donation from one deceased donor liver by splitting the liver into left (segment II, III, IV), right anterior (segment V, VIII), and right posterior lobes (segment VI, VII) for liver transplantation according to the portal system trifurcated variations. We designed the right anterior branch with the main portal trunk and middle hepatic artery to become inflow of right anterior lobe, the left portal vein and left hepatic artery to become the inflow of left lobe and right posterior branch, and right hepatic artery to become the inflow of right posterior lobe. We retrospectively reviewed the volumetric computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography of 153 liver donors. The hepatic and portal veins, hepatic artery, and biliary system were reorganized and classified. The volumetric proportions of the liver grafts were measured. Trifurcation of the portal vein variation was found in approximately 13.7% of portal systemic variations. The left lobe accounted for 29.18% of the total liver volume, the right anterior lobe, 35.22%, and the right posterior lobe, 35.6%. We validated this principle by dissecting the explanted liver and identified the triple grafts' weights, percentages, vessels, and biliary ducts system. The splitting of deceased donor livers into 3 split liver grafts for use in liver transplantation surgery can be clinically useful.

Significance of Portal Venous Velocity in Short-term Graft Function in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft regeneration and functional recovery after reperfusion of transplanted graft are very important for successful living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of postoperative portal venous velocity (PVV) in short-term recovery of graft function in LDLT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2007 through December 2015, we performed 17 primary LDLTs, which were included in the present study. The patients ranged in age from 12 to 65 years (mean: 50 years), and 11 were female patients. Postoperatively, Doppler ultrasonography was performed daily to measure PVV (cm/s), and liver function parameters were measured daily. The change in PVV (ΔPVV) was defined as follows: ΔPVV = PVV on postoperative day (POD) 1 - PVV on POD 7. Maximal value of serum aspartate aminotransferase (ASTmax) and maximal value of serum alanine transaminase (ALTmax) at 24 hours after graft reperfusion were used as parameters of reperfusion injury. Correlation analyses were performed as follows: (1) correlation of ΔPVV and PVV on POD 1 (PVV-POD 1) with the values such as ASTmax, ALTmax, other liver function parameters on POD 7 and graft regeneration rate; (2) correlation of ASTmax and ALTmax with other liver function parameters on POD 7.

RESULTS

ΔPVV significantly correlated with the values of serum total bilirubin (P < .01), prothrombin time (P < .01), and platelet count (P < .05), and PVV-POD 1 significantly correlated with the values of serum total bilirubin (P < .05) and prothrombin time (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

ΔPVV and PVV-POD 1 may be useful parameters of short-term functional recovery of the transplant liver in LDLT.