Landscape of Kidney Transplantation in Patients With Compensated Liver Disease: Results of a Survey of Transplant Surgeons in the United States

Kidney transplant candidacy evaluation and waitlisting practices in the United States and their association with access to transplantation

There are limited data on the degree of variability in practices surrounding prioritization of referrals for transplant evaluation and criteria for transplant candidacy and their association with transplantation rates. We surveyed transplant programs across the United States between January 2020 and May 2020 to determine current pre-transplantation practices. We examined the relation between these reported practices and the outcomes of waitlisted patients at responding programs between January 2015 and March 2021 using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data. We used adjusted Cox models with random effects to accommodate clustering by program. Primary outcomes included living or deceased donor transplantation. Of 172 surveyed programs, 90 participated. Substantial variations were noted in when the candidacy evaluation began (13% reported when eGFR was <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 17% reported no set policy) and the approach to pre-transplantation cardiac workup (multi-modality [58%], stress echocardiogram [20%]). Using adjusted models, a program policy of using other measures of body habitus to determine transplant candidacy rather than requiring patients to meet a body mass index (BMI) threshold of ≤35 kg/m2 (reference group) for candidacy was associated with a higher hazard of living donor transplantation (HR 1.83 [95% CI 1.10-3.03]). Pre-transplant practices vary substantially across the United States, and select practices were associated with transplantation rates.

The prognostic impact of cirrhosis on patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Further study is needed on the prognostic impact of cirrhosis on haemodialysis patients.

AIM

To evaluate cirrhosis' impact according to severity on survival and to provide therapeutic guidelines for haemodialysis cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

Patients with end-stage renal failure treated with haemodialysis were included retrospectively from 01/01/2000 to 31/12/2004 and prospectively from 01/01/2005 to 31/12/2014 in our French Region. Clinical data, presence of cirrhosis and its severity were recorded at the beginning of haemodialysis. The primary endpoint was 2-year survival.

RESULTS

Seven thousand three hundred and fifty-four patients (96%) without cirrhosis and 304 patients (4%) with cirrhosis were included. Two-year survival in noncirrhotic patients was higher than in cirrhotic patients (71.7% vs 54.4%, P < 0.0001). Patients with decompensated cirrhosis had a worse 2-year outcome (44.1%) as compared to compensated cirrhotic (62.8%, P = 0.002) and noncirrhotic patients (71.7%, P < 0.0001). Compensated and decompensated cirrhosis were independent predictive factors of 2-year mortality. In sensitivity analysis restricted to cirrhotic patients, 2-year survival of Child-Pugh A patients was higher than in Child-Pugh B and C patients (65.5% vs 27.7% vs 0%, P < 0.0001). Development of predictive models based either on severity scores (MELD and Child-Pugh) and extrahepatic comorbidities allowed correct classification of around 70% of patients in terms of mortality and may help to better stratify mortality risk in this population.

CONCLUSIONS

Cirrhosis is independently associated with mortality in haemodialysis patients. Patients with severe cirrhosis have a poor 2-year outcome. Severity of cirrhosis and presence of extrahepatic comorbidities should be considered when deciding to initiate renal replacement therapy.