1
|
Tosi D, Brivio M, Franzi S, Palleschi A, Bonitta G, Lopez G, Righi I, Mendogni P, Cattaneo M, Damarco F, Morlacchi L, Rossetti V, Rosso L. Transition from Transbronchial Forceps to Cryobiopsy After Lung Transplantation: A Single-Centre Experience. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:1474. [PMID: 39598272 PMCID: PMC11595684 DOI: 10.3390/life14111474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2024] [Revised: 11/07/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The gold standard for histological acute cellular rejection diagnosis is transbronchial forceps biopsy (FB), but in recent years, transbronchial cryobiopsy (CB) has been increasingly used. This study aims to compare the diagnostic rate and safety of FBs and CBs performed in two different periods. We retrospectively reviewed our case history for the two biopsy procedures: 251 FBs (223 for surveillance purposes and 28 for clinical indication) and 218 consecutive CBs (159 for surveillance purposes and 59 for clinical indication). All biopsies were scored according to the ISHLT criteria. Diagnostic yield was higher in the CB group for all the parameters considered: a grade of acute rejection (AR) was detected in 95.0% vs. 84.5% in the CB vs. FB groups (p < 0.001). The diagnostic rate of airway inflammation was 65.1% vs. 51.8% (p = 0.005), and 89.0% vs. 64.9% (p < 0.001) for chronic rejection. Pneumothorax requiring chest drainage occurred in 4% of the CB group and 3% of the FB group. Moderate and severe bleeding complicated CB and FB procedures in seven (3%) and three cases (1%), respectively. Transbronchial cryobiopsies improved the diagnostic yield in the monitoring of the lung allograft. The complication rate did not increase significantly in CBs vs. FBs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Tosi
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy; (D.T.); (M.B.); or (A.P.); (I.R.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (F.D.); or (L.R.)
| | - Margherita Brivio
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy; (D.T.); (M.B.); or (A.P.); (I.R.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (F.D.); or (L.R.)
| | - Sara Franzi
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy; (D.T.); (M.B.); or (A.P.); (I.R.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (F.D.); or (L.R.)
| | - Alessandro Palleschi
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy; (D.T.); (M.B.); or (A.P.); (I.R.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (F.D.); or (L.R.)
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 12, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.B.);
| | - Gianluca Bonitta
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 12, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.B.);
| | - Gianluca Lopez
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Ilaria Righi
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy; (D.T.); (M.B.); or (A.P.); (I.R.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (F.D.); or (L.R.)
| | - Paolo Mendogni
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy; (D.T.); (M.B.); or (A.P.); (I.R.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (F.D.); or (L.R.)
| | - Margherita Cattaneo
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy; (D.T.); (M.B.); or (A.P.); (I.R.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (F.D.); or (L.R.)
| | - Francesco Damarco
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy; (D.T.); (M.B.); or (A.P.); (I.R.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (F.D.); or (L.R.)
| | - Letizia Morlacchi
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 12, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.B.);
- Respiratory Unit and Cystic Fibrosis Adult Center, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Valeria Rossetti
- Respiratory Unit and Cystic Fibrosis Adult Center, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Lorenzo Rosso
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy; (D.T.); (M.B.); or (A.P.); (I.R.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (F.D.); or (L.R.)
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 12, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.B.);
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Garcia Rueda JE, Botero Bahamón JD, Cardona Palacio A, Campo Campo FDJ, Palacio Mejía MI. Cryobiopsy as a Diagnostic Tool in Lung Transplantation: A Case Report. Cureus 2024; 16:e68554. [PMID: 39364498 PMCID: PMC11449401 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Lung transplantation is an option for patients with advanced lung pathologies. Transbronchial biopsies are routinely conducted during the first year to manage acute rejection episodes, with chronic rejection, particularly bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, becoming a significant concern thereafter. A 34-year-old patient with a diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia was admitted to the emergency room due to a severe exacerbation that caused mixed respiratory failure. He required intubation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support as a bridge to bilateral lung transplantation. Post-transplantation, cryobiopsy was implemented according to local protocol, revealing A3 rejection without microbiological isolations. The implementation of cryobiopsy in lung transplantation proves to be an effective diagnostic strategy, offering enhanced tissue evaluation and improved diagnostic performance in both acute and chronic cellular rejection.
Collapse
|
3
|
Tache-Codreanu DL, David I, Popp CG, Bobocea L, Trăistaru MR. Successfully physical therapy program for functional respiratory rehabilitation after lung transplant surgery - case report. ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY = REVUE ROUMAINE DE MORPHOLOGIE ET EMBRYOLOGIE 2024; 65:331-340. [PMID: 39020549 PMCID: PMC11384042 DOI: 10.47162/rjme.65.2.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
The first lung transplant (LT) was made in Romania in 2018 at a 36-year-old male patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The study follows the first LT rehabilitation by describing the physical therapy program (PTP), the measurements of body mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) by bio-impedancemetry analysis (BIA) and the functional capacity assessment realized by the six-minute walk test (6MWT) and by the functional respiratory tests (FRTs) in order to evaluate the effectiveness of functional respiratory rehabilitation in this case during a period of one year. In parallel, repeated transbronchial biopsies were performed after six weeks, three months, six months and one year since the transplant. Only the first biopsies showed injuries suggesting an acute rejection, all the rest revealing mild, unspecific lesions. The patient followed 15 sessions of respiratory exercises, joints mobilizations and progressive global muscle strength started one month after LT surgery and was also instructed to perform the exercises at home, using a tablet given at discharge and under monthly guidance through telemedicine. All the measurements were performed before and after the rehabilitation cure, and it was repeated at three different evaluations for one year. The results showed that at the end of follow-up, the 6MWT was significantly increased from 59% of predicted distance at the intake in post-acute hospitalization to 166% at one year after LT, without desaturation that represent a very good evolution; the FRTs increased to normal, and the body weight increased with 18 kg (from severe underweight to normal weight) with constant increasement of skeletal muscle mass. The use of PTP after LT surgery significantly improves functional capacity and increases body mass and skeletal muscle mass.
Collapse
|
4
|
Pradère P, Zajacova A, Bos S, Le Pavec J, Fisher A. Molecular monitoring of lung allograft health: is it ready for routine clinical use? Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32:230125. [PMID: 37993125 PMCID: PMC10663940 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0125-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Maintenance of long-term lung allograft health in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) requires a fine balancing act between providing sufficient immunosuppression to reduce the risk of rejection whilst at the same time not over-immunosuppressing individuals and exposing them to the myriad of immunosuppressant drug side-effects that can cause morbidity and mortality. At present, lung transplant physicians only have limited and rather blunt tools available to assist them with this task. Although therapeutic drug monitoring provides clinically useful information about single time point and longitudinal exposure of LTRs to immunosuppressants, it lacks precision in determining the functional level of immunosuppression that an individual is experiencing. There is a significant gap in our ability to monitor lung allograft health and therefore tailor optimal personalised immunosuppression regimens. Molecular diagnostics performed on blood, bronchoalveolar lavage or lung tissue that can detect early signs of subclinical allograft injury, differentiate rejection from infection or distinguish cellular from humoral rejection could offer clinicians powerful tools in protecting lung allograft health. In this review, we look at the current evidence behind molecular monitoring in lung transplantation and ask if it is ready for routine clinical use. Although donor-derived cell-free DNA and tissue transcriptomics appear to be the techniques with the most immediate clinical potential, more robust data are required on their performance and additional clinical value beyond standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Pradère
- Newcastle University Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph and Paris Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Zajacova
- Prague Lung Transplant Program, Department of Pneumology, Motol University Hospital and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Saskia Bos
- Newcastle University Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Transplantation, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jérôme Le Pavec
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph and Paris Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Andrew Fisher
- Newcastle University Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Transplantation, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mondoni M, Rinaldo RF, Solidoro P, Di Marco F, Patrucco F, Pavesi S, Baccelli A, Carlucci P, Radovanovic D, Santus P, Raimondi F, Vedovati S, Morlacchi LC, Blasi F, Sotgiu G, Centanni S. Interventional pulmonology techniques in lung transplantation. Respir Med 2023; 211:107212. [PMID: 36931574 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
Lung transplantation is a key therapeutic option for several end-stage lung diseases. Interventional pulmonology techniques, mostly bronchoscopy, play a key role throughout the whole path of lung transplantation, from donor evaluation to diagnosis and management of post-transplant complications. We carried out a non-systematic, narrative literature review aimed at describing the main indications, contraindications, performance characteristics and safety profile of interventional pulmonology techniques in the context of lung transplantation. We highlighted the role of bronchoscopy during donor evaluation and described the debated role of surveillance bronchoscopy (with bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsy) to detect early rejection, infections and airways complications. The conventional (transbronchial forceps biopsy) and the new techniques (i.e. cryobiopsy, biopsy molecular assessment, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy) can detect and grade rejection. Several endoscopic techniques (e.g. balloon dilations, stent placement, ablative techniques) are employed in the management of airways complications (ischemia and necrosis, dehiscence, stenosis and malacia). First line pleural interventions (i.e. thoracentesis, chest tube insertion, indwelling pleural catheters) may be useful in the context of early and late pleural complications occurring after lung transplantation. High quality studies are advocated to define endoscopic standard protocols and thus help improving long-term prognostic outcomes of lung transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Mondoni
- Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Rocco Francesco Rinaldo
- Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Solidoro
- S.C. Pneumologia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Fabiano Di Marco
- Pulmonary Medicine Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy; Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Patrucco
- Respiratory Diseases Unit, Medical Department, AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Stefano Pavesi
- Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Baccelli
- Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Carlucci
- Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Dejan Radovanovic
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Pierachille Santus
- Division of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Polo Universitario, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Sergio Vedovati
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Blasi
- Respiratory Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy; Department Pathophysiology and Trasplantation, Università degli studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Sotgiu
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical, Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Stefano Centanni
- Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Usefulness of autofluorescence bronchoscopy in early diagnosis of airway complications after lung transplantation. Sci Rep 2020; 10:22316. [PMID: 33339959 PMCID: PMC7749104 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79442-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the promising results achieved so far in long-term survival after lung transplantation (LuTx), airway complications (ACs) still arise in the post-operative period. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of ACs play a critical role in preventing their onset. Specifically, large bronchi ischemia has been recognized as a triggering factor for ACs. Autofluorescence bronchoscopy, which was first introduced for early cancer diagnosis, displays ischemic mucosae as red spots, while normal vascularized mucosae appear in green. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a significant correlation exists between ACs and the red/green (RG) ratio detected on scheduled autofluorescence bronchoscopy up to 1 year after LuTx. This prospective, observational, single-center cohort study initially considered patients who underwent LuTx between July 2014 and February 2016. All patients underwent concomitant white-light and autofluorescence bronchoscopy at baseline (immediately after LuTx), on POD7, POD14, POD21, POD28, POD45, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after LuTx. An autofluorescence image of the first bronchial carina distal to the anastomosis was captured and analyzed using histograms for red and green pixels; the R/G ratio was then recorded. Potential ACs were classified according according to the presence of a white-light following the MDS (macroscopic aspect, diameter and suture) criteria. The authors assessed the association between the R/G ratio and the ACs occurrence using a generalized estimating equations model. Thirty-one patients met the inclusion criteria and were therefore selected. Out of a total of 53 bronchial anastomoses, 8 developed complications (late bronchial stenosis), with an average onset time of 201 days after LuTx. ACs showed a similar baseline covariate value when compared to anastomoses that involved no complication. Generalized estimating equations regression indicated a clear association over time between the R/G ratio and the rise of complications (p = 0.023). The authors observed a significant correlation between post-anastomotic stenosis and the delayed decrease of the R/G ratio. Preliminary outcomes suggest that autofluorescence bronchoscopy may be an effective and manageable diagnostic tool, proving complementary to other instruments for early diagnosis of ACs after LuTx. Further research is needed to confirm and detail preliminary findings.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mohamed S, Mendogni P, Tosi D, Carrinola R, Palleschi A, Righi I, Vaira V, Ferrero S, Daffrè E, Bonitta G, Diotti C, Pieropan S, Nosotti M, Rosso L. Transbronchial Cryobiopsies in Lung Allograft Recipients for Surveillance Purposes: Initial Results. Transplant Proc 2020; 52:1601-1604. [PMID: 32224013 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Transbronchial biopsy (TBB) using standard forceps is the main procedure to establish the presence of lung allograft rejection (AR) after lung transplantation. Few studies report the use of the transbronchial cryobiopsy (TCB) as a scheduled procedure for surveillance purposes in lung allograft, despite this the technique yields larger biopsies. We aimed to analyze the diagnostic yield and potential complications of TCB compared with conventional forceps biopsy for acute rejection surveillance in lung transplantation. In our center, TCBs are performed to monitor lung allografts at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. From March 2018 to September 2019 TCBs were performed in 54 lung transplanted patients for surveillance purposes. Clinical and functional data, complications, and histologic results were collected. We analyzed through a retrospective study our first 75 cases of cryobiopsies for surveillance purposes in lung allograft recipients. The diagnostic rate of AR using TCB was 100% compared with 83% using conventional TBB. Also, diagnostic rate of airway inflammation and chronic rejection was 17% and 21% higher, respectively, for TCB compared with TBB. The overall major complication rate was 9%: 1 pneumothorax case required chest tube drainage and 6 moderate bleedings. Bleeding rate in the scheduled TCB group (8%) seems to be higher if compared with scheduled TBB group (1%). TCB seems to be safe and effective for diagnosis of lung AR compared with transbronchial conventional forceps biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shehab Mohamed
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Mendogni
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Tosi
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosaria Carrinola
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Palleschi
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Righi
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Vaira
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Ferrero
- Division of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Daffrè
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Bonitta
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Diotti
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Pieropan
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Nosotti
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Rosso
- Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant Unit Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|