Effect of Institutional Case Volume on In-Hospital Mortality After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in Korea

Mortality and associated factors among patients who underwent liver transplantation in South Korea from 2017 to 2021: a retrospective observational study

Purpose

Liver transplantation (LT) in South Korea dates back to 1988. However, Asians may be reluctant to donate their organs because of the influence of their traditional religious and philosophical beliefs. We aimed to investigate the mortality and associated factors among patients admitted after LT in South Korea.

Methods

The South Korean National Health Insurance Service database was used as a data source. All adult patients who underwent LT between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021 (5 years) were included in the study.

Results

A total of 7,316 patients were included in the analysis (living donor LT [LDLT], 5,412; deceased donor LT [DDLT], 1,904). The 1-year mortality rate was 12.8% (LDLT, 8.2%; DDLT, 25.9%; P < 0.001), and the postoperative complication rate was 26.8% (LDLT, 16.7%; DDLT, 55.6%; P < 0.001). The average length of hospital stay was 30.8 days, and that in the intensive care unit was 6.1 days. The total mean cost was 69,954 US dollars, and the self-cost was 6,008 US dollars. After adjusting confounders, DDLT (hazard ratio [HR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79-5.20; P < 0.001), re-LDLT (HR, 4.82; 95% CI, 3.10-7.40; P < 0.001), re-DDLT (HR, 4.65; 95% CI, 3.55-7.12; P < 0.001), and postoperative complications (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.39-2.12; P < 0.001) were potential risk factors for higher 1-year mortality after transplantation.

Conclusion

LDLT was performed at a higher rate in South Korea and was associated with lower mortality and fewer postoperative complications than DDLT. Redo LT led to higher mortality rates.

Hospital Mortality and Current Trends in Liver Transplantation in Germany—a Systematic Analysis of Standardized Hospital Discharge Data, 2008–2017

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) has undergone dynamic developments in recent decades. In Germany, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) recently tightened the guidelines regarding the minimum number of transplantations a center should perform annually. The aim of the study presented here, was to analyze recent trends in hospital mortality due to LT in Germany.

METHODS

Standardized hospital discharge data (2008-2017) from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany were used to establish hospital mortality after LT and case volume distribution among centers performing <20 LT annually (low volume centers, LVC), 20-49 LT (medium volume centers, MVC), and ≥ 50 LT (high volume centers, HVC).

RESULTS

Data from 9254 LT procedures were evaluated. The annual frequency of LT fell from n = 984 (2008) to n = 747 (2017), and over the same period the hospital mortality for all LT procedures went down from 15.8% to 11.0%. Hospital mortality was associated with age (<16 years: 5.3% to 60-69 years: 17.4%); however, there was no further increase in patients ≥ 70 years (16.5%). Univariate analysis revealed association of increased hospital mortality with liver disease etiology, the necessity for relaparotomy, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. The proportion of LT procedures performed in LVC and MVC increased and that in HVC decreased. LVC had higher hospital mortality than MVC/HVC, but this effect was dependent on patient age and disease etiology.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that differences in mortality rate after LT among centers (LVC vs. MVC/HVC) were dependent on patient age and disease etiology. This should be taken into account when discussing the overall organization of LT in Germany.

Association between surgical volumes and hospital mortality in patients: a living donor liver transplantation single center experience

Background

Many factors cause hospital mortality (HM) after liver transplantation (LT).

Methods

We performed a retrospective research in a single center from October 2005 to June 2019. The study included 463 living donor LT patients. They were divided into a no-HM group (n = 433, 93.52%) and an HM group (n = 30, 6.48%). We used logistic regression analysis to determine how clinical features and surgical volume affected HM. We regrouped patients based on periods of surgical volume and analyzed the clinical features.

Results

Multivariate analysis revealed that donor age (OR = 1.050, 95% CI 1.011–1.091, p = 0.012), blood loss (OR = 1.000, 95% CI 1.000–1.000, p = 0.004), and annual surgical volumes being < 30 LTs (OR = 2.540, 95% CI 1.011–6.381, p = 0.047) were significant risk factors. A comparison of years based on surgical volume found that when the annual surgical volumes were at least 30 the recipient age (p = 0.023), donor age (p = 0.026), and ABO-incompatible operations (p < 0.001) were significantly higher and blood loss (p < 0.001), operative time (p < 0.001), intensive care unit days (p < 0.001), length of stay (p = 0.011), rate of re-operation (p < 0.001), and HM (p = 0.030) were significantly lower compared to when the annual surgical volumes were less than 30.

Conclusions

Donor age, blood loss and an annual surgical volume < 30 LTs were significant pre- and peri-operative risk factors. Hospital mortality and annual surgical volume were associated with statistically significant differences; surgical volume may impact quality of care and transplant outcomes.

Effect of institutional case volume on mid-term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

OBJECTIVE

The impact of center case volume on mid-term postoperative outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) is still controversial and requires investigation. The aim of this study was to compare mid-term survival after CABG according to the institutional annual CABG case volume.

METHODS

Adult patients (≥ 18 years) who underwent CABG from 2009 to 2016 were identified by searching National Health Insurance database of Korea for CABG procedure codes. Hospitals were classified into three groups based on annual case volume; low-volume centers (< 20 cases/year), medium-volume centers (20-50 cases/year), and high-volume centers (> 50 cases/year).

RESULTS

A total of 22,575 CABG were performed in 95 centers during the study period, and 14,697 (65.1%) cases performed at 15 high-volume centers, 5,262 (23.3%) cases at 26 medium-volume centers, and 2,616 (11.6%) cases at 54 low-volume centers. The overall 1-year mortality rate was the lowest in high-volume centers (6.5%), followed by medium-volume centers (10.6%) and low-volume centers (15.2%). Logistic regression identified medium-volume centers (adjusted OR 1.30 [95% CI 1.15-1.49], P < 0.01) and low-volume centers (adjusted OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.51-2.03], P < 0.01) as risk factors for 1-year mortality after CABG compared to high-volume centers. In the Cox proportional hazard model, low- and medium-volume centers were significantly risk factors for poor survival (adjusted HR 1.41 [95% CI 1.31-1.54], P < 0.01 and HR 1.26 [95% CI 1.17-1.35], P < 0.01 for low- and medium-volume centers, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher institutional case volume of CABG was associated with lower mid-term mortality.

500 Consecutive Liver Transplants: The Outcomes of a New Transplantation Program in the Middle West of Brazil

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation is the standard treatment for end-stage liver disease. Brazil holds the third highest number of liver transplants performed per year, but center maldistribution results in high discrepancies in accessing this treatment. In 2012, an interstate partnership successfully implemented a new liver transplantation program in the middle west of Brazil. Here, we report the results of the first 500 liver transplants performed in this new program and discuss the impacts of a new transplant center in regional transplantation dynamics.

METHODS

We reviewed data from the first 500 consecutive deceased donor liver transplants performed in the new program during an 8-year period. We analyzed data on patients' clinical and demographic profiles, postoperative outcomes, and graft and recipient survival rates. Univariate survival analysis was conducted using log-rank tests to compare the groups.

RESULTS

Almost half (48%) of the procured organs and 40% of the recipients transplanted in our center were from outside our state. Recipient 30-day mortality was 9%. Overall recipient survival at 1 year and 5 years was 85% and 80%, respectively. Mortality was significantly associated with higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (P < .001) but not with the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (P = .795).

DISCUSSION

The new transplantation program treated patients from different regions of Brazil and became the reference center in liver transplantation for the middle west region. Despite the recent implementation, our outcomes are comparable to experienced centers around the world. This model can inspire the creation of new transplantation programs aiming to democratize access to liver transplantation nationwide.