Comparison Between Phenotypic Bead Assay and Single Antigen Bead Assay for Determining Specificity of HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Waiting List

Impact of HLA Eplet Mismatch on De Novo Donor Specific Antibody Formation After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

HLA eplet mismatching is an alternative approach to assess the risk of developing de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) in kidney transplantation. This strategy may offer more precise risk stratification than conventional approaches. This study aimed to find the association between HLA eplet mismatches and dnDSA formation in Thai kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2021 at Ramathibodi Hospital was performed. Recipients with pretransplant panel reactive antibody >0% or without DSA testing post-transplant were excluded. One hundred fifty recipients were included in the final study. High-resolution HLA typing was imputed by the HaploStat application. HLA eplet mismatch analysis was conducted using HLAMatchmaker. The association between the number of eplet mismatches and the risk of dnDSA formation was assessed by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 150 recipients, 43 were dnDSA-positive, and 107 were dnDSA-negative patients. Compared with the dnDSA-negative group, patients with class II dnDSA had significantly more HLA-DR/DQ antibody (Ab)-verified eplet mismatches (6 [IQR 4-8] vs 4 [IQR 1-7], P = .045). The receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that the HLA-DQ Ab-verified eplet mismatches ≥2 were the best predictive of HLA class II dnDSA development. The number of HLA-DQ Ab-verified eplet mismatches ≥2 had the highest hazard rate of HLA class II dnDSA occurrence (adjusted HR, 3.74; 95%CI, 1.24-11.24, P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

HLA-DQ Ab-verified eplet mismatches are significantly associated with class II dnDSA development. Our data supports the utility of HLA eplet mismatching for donor-recipient risk assessment.

The correlation of results of panel reactive antibody, identification, and single antigen beads in detection of anti-HLA antibodies: Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, tissue typing laboratory experience

BACKGROUND

We have performed a retrospective analysis of anti-HLA class I MHC and class II MHC antibodies measured using a single antigen bead (SAB) assay and a panel reactive antibody (PRA) assay.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A group of 256 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was tested for anti-HLA antibodies in the tissue typing laboratory between 2017 and 2020. In the cohort, the serum samples of patients waiting for transplantation were tested. Both the PRA and SAB tests of these patients were analyzed using the Luminex (Immucor) method. The threshold of positivity was accepted as median fluorescence intensities (MFI) ≥1000 for PRA screening and MFI ≥750 for SAB screening.

RESULTS

Overall, antibodies to HLA antigens were detected in 202 (78.9%) out of 256 patients in the PRA study. Antibodies against both class I/II antigens were detected only in 15.6% of these patients, whereas antibodies against only against class I HLA in 31.3% and only against class II HLA in 32.0%. By comparison, the SAB study found that 66.8% of patients were positive for HLA antigens. Furthermore, donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were detected in 52.0% of PRA-positive patients and 52.6% of SAB-positive patients. It was shown that 168 patients (83.2%) out of 202 PRA-positive patients were found to be SAB-positive. In addition, 51 patients negative in the SAB assay (94.4%) were also negative in the PRA assay. Statistical analysis established a significant correlation between the PRA and SAB positivity (p > 0.001). It was also shown that MFI ≥3000 PRA positivity for class I HLA antigens (p = 0.049) and MFI ≥5000 PRA positivity for class II antigens (p < 0.001) correlated with the SAB positivity in patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed the importance of both PRA and SAB assays to define the status of sensitization in patients.

Misidentification of preformed anti-HLA-DP antibodies leads to antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection: a case report

Background

Patients who are HLA-sensitized are at high risk for early antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and worse outcomes. Therefore, it is crucial to detect the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) using pretransplant antibody identification and crossmatch assays. An error in antibody identification can lead to disastrous clinical outcomes. We present a case of acute AMR associated with preformed HLA-DPα and HLA-DPβ DSAs that were not identified before transplantation.

Case presentation

A 27-year-old woman received a second kidney transplant from a deceased donor. Her pretransplant panel-reactive antibody level was 94%. The complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative for T and B cells at the time of transplantation. She experienced early acute AMR proven by a kidney biopsy. Single antigen bead testing of the patient’s serum at the time of rejection as well as the pre-second transplant serum revealed strong antibodies against the DPA1*01:03 and DPB1*02:01 alleles in the second donor. These antibodies were not identified by phenotypic bead assay during the patient’s time on the waiting list. The patient was treated with plasmapheresis and anti-thymocyte globulin. However, she experienced abdominal pain on day 37 post-transplantation. Surgical exploration revealed a laceration on the transplanted kidney, which was then repaired. Subsequently, infected hematoma was suspected and the transplanted kidney was removed.

Conclusion

The present case highlights the clinical significance of preformed HLA-DPα and HLA-DPβ DSAs. Accuracy in determination of HLA antibodies before transplantattion is critical for transplant outcome. HLA-DP typing and single antigen bead testing are recommended for a precise antibody interpretation, especially in highly sensitized patients. Careful interpretation of antibody testing results is essential for the success of organ transplantation.