Critical Behavior and Psychopathologic Variables of the Parent-Child Couple in Living Kidney Transplantation

Depression in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review and summarize the literature published between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2022, on the prevalence, risk factors and impact of depression in transplant population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Depression is common in transplantation candidates and recipients, with a prevalence up to 85.8% in kidney recipients. Multiple studies have indicated after transplantation depression correlates with increased mortality and with higher healthcare utilization. Social risk factors for posttransplant depression include financial difficulties and unemployment, while less is understood about the biological substrate of depression in this population. There is evidence that dynamic psychotherapy is effective for depression in organ transplant recipients, while cognitive behavioral therapy or supportive therapy did not lead to improvement of depression in transplant recipients. For living organ donors, the rates of depression are similar to the general population, with financial factors and the clinical status of the recipient playing a significant role.

SUMMARY

Depression is a common finding in transplant population. More research is needed to understand the biological substrate and risk factors and to develop effective treatment interventions.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Outcomes of living unrelated donor kidney transplants in children: An Organ Procurement and Transplant Network database analysis

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting data on long-term outcomes of pediatric LURD renal Txs compared to Txs of kidneys from other donor sources.

METHODS

An analysis of the OPTN database was conducted in children (<18 years) who had received their 1st kidney-only Tx between January 1, 2000, and September 30, 2021. The primary outcome measure was time to graft failure or death. Cox event history regression model for time to primary outcome, categorized by donor source and adjusting for confounders was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 12 089 subjects, 327 (2.7%) received kidneys from LURDs, 4349 (36%) from LRDs and 7413 (61%) from DD. One year graft failure rate was 3.56%. On regression analyses, compared to LRD kidney recipients, LURD recipients had comparable graft survival (graft failure AHR 1.15, 95th percentile confidence interval 0.87-1.51; p .31) and DD recipients had lower graft survival (graft failure hazard ratio 1.26, 95th percentile confidence interval 1.10-1.43; p < .001). When using living unrelated kidney recipients as the reference group, DD kidney recipients had comparable graft survival, with a wide confidence interval (hazard ratio for graft failure 1.09; 0.83-1.43, p .53).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric LURD kidney recipients have comparable graft survival to LRD kidney recipients; DD kidney recipients had the poorest survival. Our study, the largest to date, should encourage centers to embrace non-commercial living-unrelated transplantation as a viable option for children, preferable to DD kidneys.

Effectiveness of Expressive Writing in Kidney Transplanted Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study

The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an expressive writing (EW) intervention on psychological and physiological variables after kidney transplant. The final sample of 26 were randomly assigned to an expressive writing group (EWG) and control group (CG). Outcomes were focused on depression, anxiety, alexithymia, empathy, resilience, locus of control, creatinine, CDK-EPI, and azotemia. Depressive symptoms and alexithymia levels decreased in the EWG, with better adherence. Resilience declined over time in both groups. The EWG showed a significantly higher CDK-EPI, indicating better renal functioning. EW seems an effective intervention to improve the psychological health of transplanted patients, with a possible effect on renal functioning. These findings open the possibility of planning brief psychological interventions aimed at processing emotional involvement, in order to increase adherence, the acceptance of the organ, and savings in healthcare costs.