Delayed Calcineurin Inhibitor Introduction Without Antibody Induction in Liver Transplantation Is Safe and Helps Preserve Kidney Function

Incidence and Risk Factors Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease After Liver Transplantation: A Review of a 20-Year Experience at a Single Center

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the major complications after liver transplantation (LT), with a significant impact on patient outcomes. This study aims to investigate the incidence and risk factors of CKD in LT recipients at Siriraj Hospital over the past 20 years.

METHODS

There were 366 adult patients undergoing LT at Siriraj Hospital between January 2002 and December 2021. After excluding patients with pretransplant CKD stages 4 to 5, simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation, and patients who died after LT within 90 days, we retrospectively reviewed a total of 288 patients. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors of post-transplant CKD.

RESULTS

Of the 288 patients, 171 (59.4%) developed CKD after LT. The median time to develop CKD was 5.8 months (IQR, 3.8-15.3). Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that age ≥55 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.34-4.42; P = .003), pretransplant kidney dysfunction defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR = 2.23; 95% CI, 1.16-4.27; P = .016), and postoperative acute kidney injury (OR = 3.06; 95% CI, 1.73-5.42; P < .001) were significantly associated with post-transplant CKD. Patients with preexisting kidney dysfunction who received delayed calcineurin inhibitor introduction without antibody induction protocol had a significantly lower incidence of post-transplant CKD (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.70; P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age, pre-transplant kidney dysfunction, and postoperative acute kidney injury are risk factors for CKD after LT. Importantly, delayed calcineurin inhibitor introduction can protect patients with pretransplant kidney dysfunction from developing post-transplant CKD. These results may have important clinical implications in reducing the incidence of CKD after LT.

Application of various surgical techniques in liver transplantation: a retrospective study

Background

Surgical techniques of liver transplantation have continually evolved and have been modified. We retrospectively analyzed a single-center case series and compared the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Methods

Six-hundred and seventy-four recipients’ perioperative data were assessed and analyzed stratified by different surgical technics [modified classic (MC), modified piggyback (MPB) and classic piggyback (CPB)].

Results

MELD score and Child-Pugh scores was significantly higher in CPB groups (P=0.008 and 0.003, respectively). Anhepatic time in MPB group was longer than those in CPB group (P<0.05). The operation duration in MPB group was significantly longer than those in MC group and CPB group (P=0.003). Three patients had outflow obstruction (P=0.035). The overall survival in MPB group were better than those in MC group and CPB group in general comparison (P<0.001). In patients with preoperative creatine >120 µmol/L, the overall survival in MC group was worst (P<0.001). In patients with a high MELD score (>24), the overall survival in MPB group tended to be the best (P<0.001).

Conclusions

The advantages and disadvantages are different for these three surgical techniques. A reasonable operation technique should be adopted considering the patient's unique condition to ensure the stability of hemodynamics.