The Implication of Center Volumes in Donation After Circulatory Death for Liver Transplantation: Donor-Recipient Selection and Outcomes

Challenges and opportunities in organ donation after circulatory death

In recent years, there has been resurgence in donation after circulatory death (DCD). Despite that, the number of organs transplanted from these donors remains low due to concerns about their function and a lack of an objective assessment at the time of donation. This overview examines the current DCD practices and the classification modifications to accommodate regional perspectives. Several risk factors underscore the reluctance to accept DCD organs, and we discuss the modern strategies to mitigate them. The advent of machine perfusion technology has revolutionized the field of DCD transplantation, leading to improved outcomes and better organ usage. With many strategies at our disposal, there is an urgent need for comparative trials to determine the optimal use of perfusion technologies for each donated organ type. Additional progress in defining therapeutic strategies to repair the damage sustained during the dying process should further improve DCD organ utilization and outcomes. However, there remains wide variability in access to DCD donation and transplantation, and organizational efforts should be doubled up with consensus on key ethical issues that still surround DCD donation in the era of machine perfusion.

Current Understanding of Marginal Grafts in Liver Transplantation

End-stage liver disease (ESLD), stemming from a spectrum of chronic liver pathologies including chronic liver failure, acute cirrhosis decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma, imposes a significant global healthcare burden. Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only treatment for ESLD. However, the escalating mortality on transplant waitlists has prompted the utilization of marginal liver grafts in LT procedures. These grafts primarily encompass elderly livers, steatotic livers, livers from donation after circulatory death, split livers and those infected with the hepatitis virus. While the expansion of the donor pool offers promise, it also introduces concomitant risks. These encompass graft failure, biliary and cardiovascular complications, the recurrence of liver disease and reduced patient and graft survival. Consequently, various established strategies, ranging from improved donor-recipient matching to surgical interventions, have emerged to mitigate these risks. This article undertakes a comprehensive assessment of the current landscape, evaluating the viability of diverse marginal liver grafts. Additionally, it synthesizes approaches aimed at enhancing the quality of such marginal liver grafts. The overarching objective is to augment the donor pool and ameliorate the risk factors associated with the shortage of liver grafts.

Waitlist and Transplant Outcomes in Organ Donation After Circulatory Death: Trends in the United States

OBJECTIVES

To summarize waitlist and transplant outcomes in kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplantation using organ donation after circulatory death (DCD).

BACKGROUND

DCD has expanded the donor pool for solid organ transplantation, most recently for heart transplantation.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was used to identify adult transplant candidates and recipients in the most recent allocation policy eras for kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplantation. Transplant candidates and recipients were grouped by acceptance criteria for DCD versus brain-dead donors [donation after brain death (DBD)] only and DCD versus DBD transplant, respectively. Propensity matching and competing-risks regression was used to model waitlist outcomes. Survival was modeled using propensity matching and Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

DCD transplant volumes have increased significantly across all organs. Liver candidates listed for DCD organs were more likely to undergo transplantation compared with propensity-matched candidates listed for DBD only, and heart and liver transplant candidates listed for DCD were less likely to experience death or clinical deterioration requiring waitlist inactivation. Propensity-matched DCD recipients demonstrated an increased mortality risk up to 5 years after liver and kidney transplantation and up to 3 years after lung transplantation compared with DBD. There was no difference in 1-year mortality between DCD and DBD heart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

DCD continues to expand access to transplantation and improves waitlist outcomes for liver and heart transplant candidates. Despite an increased risk for mortality with DCD kidney, liver, and lung transplantation, survival with DCD transplant remains acceptable.

DCD Hepatitis C Virus-positive Donor Livers Can Achieve Favorable Outcomes With Liver Transplantation and Are Underutilized

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive donors (antibody-positive [Ab + ] or nucleic acid test positive [NAT + ] donors) have been underutilized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utilization of livers from HCV-positive with donation after circulatory death (DCD) and to assess outcomes in recipients of these grafts.

METHODS

Data between 2015 and 2019 were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. The utilization rates and graft survival among 8455 DCD liver and nonliver donors and 2278 adult DCD liver transplantation (LT) recipients were reviewed on the basis of donor HCV Ab/NAT status.

RESULTS

The utilization of Ab + /NAT - donors <40 y and Ab + /NAT + donors ≥40 y was low than utilization of HCV-negative donors ( P  < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified HCV status (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.48 in Ab + /NAT - , and OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.09-2.05 in Ab + /NAT + ) as an independent predictor of nonutilization of liver grafts. The rate of significant liver fibrosis was comparable in Ab + /NAT - (3.5%; P  = 0.84) but was higher in Ab + /NAT + (8.7%; P  = 0.03) than that in Ab - /NAT - donors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated comparable 3-y patient survival in recipients of HCV-positive grafts compared with recipients of HCV-negative grafts ( P  = 0.63; 85.6% in Ab - /NAT - , 80.4% in Ab + /NAT - , and 88.7% in Ab + /NAT + ).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and graft survival rates are similar between HCV-positive and HCV-negative DCD LT. However, HCV-positive donors are particularly underutilized for DCD LT.