Quality of Life Outcomes and Associated Symptoms Reported by Lung Transplant Recipients Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: Applying a Novel Assessment Tool

Assessing quality of life in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review of the development, content, and quality of available condition- and transplant-specific patient-reported outcome measures

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify the condition- and transplant-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) available to measure quality of life (QoL) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, examine their development and content, and critically appraise the quality of their measurement properties, to inform recommendations for clinical and research use.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception to 27th January 2023. Search hits were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers; papers reporting the development and/or validation of condition- and transplant-specific PROMs measuring QoL in adult SOT recipients were considered eligible. We abstracted and synthesised data on PROM characteristics, development (item generation and/or reduction), and content (QoL dimensions). Quality appraisal and synthesis were informed by the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines, and included methodological and quality assessment of measurement properties, GRADE levels of evidence, feasibility and interpretability.

RESULTS

We identified 33 papers reporting 26 QoL PROMs validated in SOT recipients (kidney n = 10 PROMs; liver n = 6; lung n = 3; heart n = 2; pancreas n = 1; multiple organs n = 4). Patient discussions (n = 17 PROMs) and factor analysis (n = 11) were the most common item generation and reduction techniques used, respectively. All PROMs measured ≥3 of nine QoL dimensions (all measured emotional functioning); KDQoL-SF and NIDDK-QA measured all nine. Methodological quality was variable; no PROM had low evidence or better for all measurement properties. All PROMs were COSMIN recommendation category 'B', primarily because none had sufficient content validity.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many condition- and transplant-specific QoL PROMs validated in SOT recipients, particularly kidney. These findings can help inform PROM selection for clinicians and researchers. However, caution is required when adopting measures, due to the substantial heterogeneity in development, content, and quality. Each PROM has potential but requires further research to be recommendable. Greater consideration of patient and professional involvement in PROM development in this setting is needed to ensure sufficient content validity.

Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life in Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients

OBJECTIVES

Health-related quality of life has been well studied across transplantation fields, but factors associated with lung transplant preoperative and postoperative quality of life remain unknown. Here, we determine factors associated with health-related quality of life in lung transplant candidates and recipients to identify patients at risk of lower health-related quality of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2021 to May 2022, health-related quality of life was measured in candidates and recipients using the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire. We reviewed demographic parameters and clinical information and scored frailty according to the modified 5-item frailty index. We performed Fisher exact test and the Pearson chi-square test and used linear regression models to determine covariate associations on physical component summary, mental component summary, and self-reported health scores (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Eleven candidates and 17 recipients comp-leted the survey. Compared with candidates, transplant recipients reported significantly higher scores in 4 of the 8 health domains and in the physical component summary (P < .01), mental component summary (P = .05), and self-reported health score (P < .01). In candidates, higher body mass index and higher modified 5-item frailty index scores were negatively associated with the physical component summary and mental component summary, respec-tively (P < .05). In recipients, higher body mass index and higher lung allocation scores were associated with lower values for the physical component summary (-2.29; P < .05) and self-reported health score (-0.33; P < .05), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Body mass index, the modified 5-item frailty index, and the lung allocation score were significantly associated with health-related quality of life in lung transplant recipients. Future interventions should target these modifiable associations to maximize candidate and recipient health-related quality of life.