Potential Role of Computed Tomography Volumetry in Size Matching in Lung Transplantation

Size-matching in lung transplantation by computed tomography for end-stage interstitial disease: a retrospective analysis

Background

Size matching between donors and recipients is a major issue in lung transplantation (LTx), especially in patients with restrictive lung disease (RLD). This study aims to evaluate computed tomography (CT) as an additional method for defining the total lung capacity (TLC) in patients with end-stage interstitial disease awaiting LTx.

Methods

Clinical data and CT scans from patients who underwent a first LTx from January 2014 to July 2018 in Bichat Hospital, Paris, were prospectively included in a database. CT TLC (ctTLC) was retrospectively calculated after semi-automatic contouring of the parenchyma and compared with measured TLC (mTLC) and predicted TLC (pTLC) values.

Results

The study group included 89 patients (male:female =68:21; mean age, 59.5±10.0 years). The time between pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and CT scan was 162±270 days [median, 67 days; interquartile range (IQR), 0-233 days]. ctTLC was inferior to mTLC and pTLC (respectively 2,979±1,001 mL, 3,530±1,077 and 6,381±955 mL, P<0.001). The relative difference between CT lung volume (ctLV) and measured lung volume (mLV) was higher on the left than on the right side (25.4% vs. 16.3%, respectively, P=0.11). After exclusion of two outliers, we found a significant correlation between ctTLC and mTLC (r=0.762, P<0.001).

Conclusions

CT volume is a feasible method to assess TLC in patients with end-stage interstitial disease awaiting LTx. This study highlights potential size-mismatch for graft selection before LTx and opens the perspective of a prospective trial evaluating impact of size-matching by donor-recipient (D-R) ctTLC ratio on postoperative outcomes.

"Horses for courses" computed tomography or predicted total lung capacity for size matching in lung transplantation

Size-matching donors to recipients in lung transplantation continues to be a clinical challenge. Predicted total lung capacity equations, or more simply, donor and recipient heights, while widely used, are imprecise and may not be representative of the pool of donors and recipients. These inherent limitations may result in size discrepancies. The advent of easily accessible software and the widespread availability of computed tomography (CT) imaging in donor assessments have made it possible to directly measure lung volumes in donors and recipients. As a result, there is a growing interest in adopting personalized CT volumetry as an alternative. This article explores both methods and underscores the potential benefits and precision offered by CT.