1
|
Saperstein AM, Subhan BA, Golub JS, Medalia A. Hearing Loss in Older People With Schizophrenia: Audiologic Characteristics and Association With Psychosocial Functioning. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2024; 32:489-496. [PMID: 38030420 PMCID: PMC10950537 DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The severity and impact of hearing deficits among adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders may become increasingly relevant with advancing age. This study evaluated hearing ability and associated psychosocial functioning among older adults aged 50-70. DESIGN Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING Four outpatient psychiatry clinics in New York City. PARTICIPANTS Individuals aged 50-70 years with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. MEASUREMENTS Unaided pure tone air conduction audiometry conducted using a portable audiometry system determined the pure tone average (PTA) hearing threshold across four frequencies: 500, 1k, 2k, and 4k Hz. Better ear PTA defined the hearing threshold. Audiometry data retrieved from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey aided interpretation of sample hearing loss rates. Standard measures evaluated psychiatric symptoms, perceived impact of hearing impairment, loneliness, and quality of life. RESULTS Among audiometry completers (N = 40), 35% (n = 14) demonstrated subclinical hearing loss (16-25 dB) and 35% (n = 14) had mild or worse hearing loss (≥26 dB). Rates were higher than expected based on age-based population data. Those who perceived hearing handicap rated it moderate (12.2%) or severe (7.3%); those who perceived tinnitus rated the impact as mild to moderate (12.2%) or catastrophic (2.4%). Neither psychiatric symptoms nor interviewer-rated quality of life was associated with hearing ability. Greater loneliness was significantly correlated with worse audiologic performance (r = 0.475, p <0.01) and greater perceived hearing handicap (r = 0.480, p <0.01). CONCLUSION Identifying the need for hearing loss treatment among aging adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders is important given the potential implications for social functioning, cognitive, and mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice M Saperstein
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry (AMS, AM), Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY.
| | - Bibi A Subhan
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry (BAS), Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Justin S Golub
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery (JSG), Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Alice Medalia
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry (AMS, AM), Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pyer M, Ward A. Developing a dementia friendly approach to consent in dementia research. Aging Ment Health 2024; 28:294-301. [PMID: 37885301 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2264216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This paper explores the process of gaining consent from the perspectives of people living with dementia, their relatives/carers, and service providers. This is developed based on new primary qualitative research and addresses a gap in critical reflection on the practice and ethical process of research consent. METHODS A qualitative approach was used to conduct this research through the implementation of four focus groups run with people living with dementia (n = 12), two focus groups with family members (n = 6), two focus groups with service staff (n = 5). RESULTS Data was analysed thematically, to identify two core themes: consent as a journey and the flexible consent approach. These identified concerns with autonomy, decision making and placing people living with dementia at the centre of the consent process. The journey of consent emerged as central to supporting participation and enhancing the consent process. CONCLUSION The paper presents new evidence about the lived experience of research consent in the field of dementia, presenting the process of collecting consent in research as a flexible process that is best supported through a growing knowledge of participants and participation sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Pyer
- Faculty of Health, Education and Society, University Drive, University of Northampton, Northampton, UK
| | - Alison Ward
- Faculty of Health, Education and Society, University Drive, University of Northampton, Northampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lapid MI, Clarke BL, Ho JB, Ouellette Y, Armbrust TL, Wright RS. Research Involving Participants With Impaired Consent Capacity: An Examination of Methods to Determine Capacity to Consent. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96:2806-2822. [PMID: 34736608 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine methods of assessing consent capacity in research protocols involving participants with impaired consent capacity, and examine instruments used to evaluate research consent capacity. METHODS A retrospective review of 330 active research protocols involving participants lacking capacity to consent over a 10-year period (January 1, 2009, through March 1, 2019) was conducted to collect protocol characteristics (medical specialty, level of risk and type of study, consent and assent procedures, and type of vulnerable or protected population). Methods to assess consent capacity are described, and instruments to assess consent capacity are summarized. RESULTS The specialties most frequently involving participants with impaired consent capacity in research were Neurology (27.3%), Critical Care (16.7%), and Surgery (10%). Type of studies are observational (43.9%), clinical trials (33%), chart review (11.5%), biobank (6.1%), and biomarker (5.5%). Minimal risk (53.3%) outnumbered greater than minimal risk (46.7%) studies. Most obtained written informed consent (77%) and assent (40.9%). The most common method to assess consent capacity was direct assessment by investigators (32.7%). Only 86 (26%) studies used instruments to assess consent capacity. Of the 13 instruments used, the most common was the Evaluation of Decision-Making Capacity for Consent to Act as a Research Subject, and is the only instrument that assesses all four components of decisional capacity: understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and choice. CONCLUSION Generally, there was lack of uniformity in determining capacity to consent to research participation. Very few studies used instruments to assess consent capacity. Institutional review boards can provide greater guidance for research consent capacity determination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria I Lapid
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and Office of Human Research Protection Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Bart L Clarke
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and Office of Human Research Protection Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jacqueline B Ho
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic Undergraduate Research Employment Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Yves Ouellette
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and Office of Human Research Protection Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tamyra L Armbrust
- Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and Office of Human Research Protection Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - R Scott Wright
- Department of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and Office of Human Research Protection Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Greimel S, Wyman JF, Zhang L, Yu F. Recruitment and Screening Methods in Alzheimer's Disease Research: The FIT-AD Trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021; 77:547-553. [PMID: 33780529 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glab092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruiting older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia into clinical trials is challenging requiring multiple approaches. We describe recruitment and screening processes and results from the FIT-AD Trial, a single site, pilot randomized controlled trial testing the effects of a 6-month aerobic exercise intervention on cognition and hippocampal volume in community-dwelling older adults with mild-to moderate AD dementia. METHODS Ten recruitment strategies and a four-step screening process were used to ensure a homogenous sample and exercise safety. The initial target sample was 90 participants over 48 months which was increased to 96 to allow those in the screening process to enroll if qualified. A tertiary analysis of recruitment and screening rates, recruitment yields and costs, and demographic characteristics of participants was conducted. RESULTS During the 48-month recruiting period, 396 potential participants responded to recruitment efforts, 301 individuals were reached and 103 were tentatively qualified. Of these, 67 (69.8%) participants completed the optional magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging and seven were excluded due to abnormal MRI findings. As a result, we enrolled 96 participants with a 2.92 screen ratio, 2.14 recruitment rate, and 31.9% recruitment yield. Referrals (28.1%) and Alzheimer's Association events/services (21.9%) yielded over 49% of the enrolled participants. Total recruitment cost was $ 38,246 or $ 398 per randomized participant. CONCLUSIONS A multi-prong approach involving extensive community outreach was essential in recruiting older adults with AD dementia into a single-site trial. For every randomized participant, three individuals needed to be screened. Referrals were the most cost-effective recruitment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Greimel
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Jean F Wyman
- School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Lin Zhang
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Fang Yu
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Phillips MCL, Deprez LM, Mortimer GMN, Murtagh DKJ, McCoy S, Mylchreest R, Gilbertson LJ, Clark KM, Simpson PV, McManus EJ, Oh JE, Yadavaraj S, King VM, Pillai A, Romero-Ferrando B, Brinkhuis M, Copeland BM, Samad S, Liao S, Schepel JAC. Randomized crossover trial of a modified ketogenic diet in Alzheimer's disease. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY 2021; 13:51. [PMID: 33622392 PMCID: PMC7901512 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-021-00783-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain energy metabolism is impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD), which may be mitigated by a ketogenic diet. We conducted a randomized crossover trial to determine whether a 12-week modified ketogenic diet improved cognition, daily function, or quality of life in a hospital clinic of AD patients. METHODS We randomly assigned patients with clinically confirmed diagnoses of AD to a modified ketogenic diet or usual diet supplemented with low-fat healthy-eating guidelines and enrolled them in a single-phase, assessor-blinded, two-period crossover trial (two 12-week treatment periods, separated by a 10-week washout period). Primary outcomes were mean within-individual changes in the Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination - III (ACE-III) scale, AD Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) inventory, and Quality of Life in AD (QOL-AD) questionnaire over 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes considered changes in cardiovascular risk factors and adverse effects. RESULTS We randomized 26 patients, of whom 21 (81%) completed the ketogenic diet; only one withdrawal was attributed to the ketogenic diet. While on the ketogenic diet, patients achieved sustained physiological ketosis (12-week mean beta-hydroxybutyrate level: 0.95 ± 0.34 mmol/L). Compared with usual diet, patients on the ketogenic diet increased their mean within-individual ADCS-ADL (+ 3.13 ± 5.01 points, P = 0.0067) and QOL-AD (+ 3.37 ± 6.86 points, P = 0.023) scores; the ACE-III also increased, but not significantly (+ 2.12 ± 8.70 points, P = 0.24). Changes in cardiovascular risk factors were mostly favourable, and adverse effects were mild. CONCLUSIONS This is the first randomized trial to investigate the impact of a ketogenic diet in patients with uniform diagnoses of AD. High rates of retention, adherence, and safety appear to be achievable in applying a 12-week modified ketogenic diet to AD patients. Compared with a usual diet supplemented with low-fat healthy-eating guidelines, patients on the ketogenic diet improved in daily function and quality of life, two factors of great importance to people living with dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered on the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12618001450202 . The trial was registered on August 28, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura M Deprez
- Department of Neurology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand.,Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Stacey McCoy
- Department of Dietetics Services, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Ruth Mylchreest
- Department of Neurology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | - Karen M Clark
- Department of Neurology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | | | - Eileen J McManus
- Department of Neurology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Jee-Eun Oh
- Department of Neurology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Satish Yadavaraj
- Department of Neurology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Vanessa M King
- LINC Mental Health Services, Tauranga Hospital, Tauranga, New Zealand
| | - Avinesh Pillai
- Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Martijn Brinkhuis
- Mental Health Services for Older People, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Bronwyn M Copeland
- Mental Health Services for Older People, Tauranga Hospital, Tauranga, New Zealand
| | - Shah Samad
- Older Persons and Rehabilitation Service, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Shenyang Liao
- Older Persons and Rehabilitation Service, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Jan A C Schepel
- Department of Neurology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jaramillo Vélez AG, Aguas Compaired M, Granados Plaza M, Mariño EL, Modamio P. Assessment of the quality of patient information sheets and informed consent forms for clinical trials at a hospital neurology service. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27:1825-1831. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.14420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. G. Jaramillo Vélez
- Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care Unit Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology and Physical Chemistry Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - M. Aguas Compaired
- Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care Unit Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology and Physical Chemistry Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
- Research Ethics Committee (CEIm) Idcsalud a Catalunya Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya Barcelona Spain
| | - M. Granados Plaza
- Research Ethics Committee (CEIm) Idcsalud a Catalunya Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya Barcelona Spain
| | - E. L. Mariño
- Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care Unit Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology and Physical Chemistry Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| | - P. Modamio
- Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Care Unit Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology and Physical Chemistry Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pace A, Koekkoek JAF, van den Bent MJ, Bulbeck HJ, Fleming J, Grant R, Golla H, Henriksson R, Kerrigan S, Marosi C, Oberg I, Oberndorfer S, Oliver K, Pasman HRW, Le Rhun E, Rooney AG, Rudà R, Veronese S, Walbert T, Weller M, Wick W, Taphoorn MJB, Dirven L. Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how? Neurooncol Pract 2020; 7:599-612. [PMID: 33312674 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Brain tumor patients are at high risk of impaired medical decision-making capacity (MDC), which can be ethically challenging because it limits their ability to give informed consent to medical treatments or participation in research. The European Association of Neuro-Oncology Palliative Care Multidisciplinary Task Force performed a systematic review to identify relevant evidence with respect to MDC that could be used to give recommendations on how to cope with reduced MDC in brain tumor patients. Methods A literature search in several electronic databases was conducted up to September 2019, including studies with brain tumor and other neurological patients. Information related to the following topics was extracted: tools to measure MDC, consent to treatment or research, predictive patient- and treatment-related factors, surrogate decision making, and interventions to improve MDC. Results A total of 138 articles were deemed eligible. Several structured capacity-assessment instruments are available to aid clinical decision making. These instruments revealed a high incidence of impaired MDC both in brain tumors and other neurological diseases for treatment- and research-related decisions. Incapacity appeared to be mostly determined by the level of cognitive impairment. Surrogate decision making should be considered in case a patient lacks capacity, ensuring that the patient's "best interests" and wishes are guaranteed. Several methods are available that may help to enhance patients' consent capacity. Conclusions Clinical recommendations on how to detect and manage reduced MDC in brain tumor patients were formulated, reflecting among others the timing of MDC assessments, methods to enhance patients' consent capacity, and alternative procedures, including surrogate consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Pace
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Johan A F Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, The Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Helen J Bulbeck
- Brainstrust (The Brain Cancer People), Cowes, Isle of Wight, UK
| | - Jane Fleming
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - Robin Grant
- Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Heidrun Golla
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roger Henriksson
- Department of Radiation Sciences and Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Christine Marosi
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Clinical Division of Medical Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ingela Oberg
- Department of Neuroscience, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stefan Oberndorfer
- Department Neurology, University Clinic St Pölten, KLPU and KLI-Neurology and Neuropsychology, St Pölten, Austria
| | - Kathy Oliver
- International Brain Tumour Alliance, Tadworth, UK
| | - H Roeline W Pasman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alasdair G Rooney
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Veronese
- Department of Palliative Care, Fondazione FARO, Turin, Italy
| | - Tobias Walbert
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, US
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Neurology Clinic and National Centre for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Consortium of Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ries N, Mansfield E, Sanson-Fisher R. Planning Ahead for Dementia Research Participation: Insights from a Survey of Older Australians and Implications for Ethics, Law and Practice. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2019; 16:415-429. [PMID: 31297689 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-019-09929-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
People with dementia have commonly been excluded from research. The adverse impacts of this exclusion are now being recognized and research literature, position statements, and ethics guidelines increasingly call for inclusion of people with dementia in research. However, few published studies investigate the views of potential participants on taking part in research should they experience dementia-related cognitive impairment. This cross-sectional survey examined the views of people aged sixty and older (n=174) attending hospital outpatient clinics about clinical research participation if they had dementia and impaired decision-making ability. Over 90 percent of respondents were agreeable to participating in a wide range of research activities, such as cognitive testing, physical measurements, imaging procedures, and blood draws. For drug studies, however, agreement dropped to 60 percent. Altruism was a strong motivator for research participation. In regard to who should be involved in decisions about their participation in research during periods of incapacity, respondents mostly preferred the person they appoint as their substitute decision-maker for healthcare matters (88%) or a doctor or health professional on the research team (78%). Over three-quarters (79%) expressed interest in making an advance research directive. The study findings are discussed in relation to law reforms in Australia that aim to strengthen respect and inclusion for people with impaired decision-making capacity, especially by providing frameworks for advance planning for research participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nola Ries
- Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
| | - Elise Mansfield
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gold M, Amatniek J, Carrillo MC, Cedarbaum JM, Hendrix JA, Miller BB, Robillard JM, Rice JJ, Soares H, Tome MB, Tarnanas I, Vargas G, Bain LJ, Czaja SJ. Digital technologies as biomarkers, clinical outcomes assessment, and recruitment tools in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials. ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA-TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS 2018; 4:234-242. [PMID: 29955666 PMCID: PMC6021547 DOI: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Digital technology is transforming the development of drugs for Alzheimer's disease and was the topic of the Alzheimer's Association's Research Roundtable on its May 23–24, 2017 meeting. Research indicates that wearable devices and unobtrusive passive sensors that enable the collection of frequent or continuous, objective, and multidimensional data during daily activities may capture subtle changes in cognition and functional capacity long before the onset of dementia. The potential to exploit these technologies to improve clinical trials as both recruitment and retention tools as well as for potential end points was discussed. The implications for the collection and use of large amounts of data, lessons learned from other related disease areas, ethical concerns raised by these new technologies, and regulatory issues were also covered in the meeting. Finally, the challenges and opportunities of these new technologies for future use were discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joan Amatniek
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Julie M Robillard
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia and Children's and Women's Hospital and Health Centres, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - J Jeremy Rice
- Healthcare and Life Science Research, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Ioannis Tarnanas
- Altoida Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA.,Scripps Memorial Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA.,Atlantic Fellow for Equity in Brain Health with the Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI) at UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Lisa J Bain
- Independent Science Writer, Elverson, PA, USA
| | - Sara J Czaja
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|