Redefining precision cancer prevention to promote health equity

Cancer prevention at the microscopic level with the potent power of micronutrients

Cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating ongoing exploration of effective prevention strategies. Micronutrients, vital for maintaining cellular health, offer promising avenues for cancer prevention. This review delineates the critical roles of micronutrients in cancer prevention, elucidating their mechanisms at the cellular level. Focusing on essential vitamins and minerals like Vitamins A, C, D, E, selenium, and zinc, we explore their profound effects on fundamental cellular processes such as DNA repair, oxidative stress regulation, cellular proliferation, and immune surveillance. These nutrients, characterized by their antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and immune-enhancing properties, have shown potential in reducing the risk of cancer. The article synthesizes outcomes from a broad spectrum of clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and systematic reviews to evaluate the efficacy of micronutrients in thwarting cancer development. This critical analysis explores significant trials, addresses controversies in nutrient efficacy, and highlights the implications for clinical practice and public health policy. The review underscores the importance of integrating nutritional strategies into comprehensive cancer prevention frameworks and suggests directions for future research to optimize the preventive potentials of micronutrients.

The "Latines Lideres En Salud (LaLiSa)" study: Rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Latines suffer from breast cancer (BC), due to elevated biological and social determinants of health (SDOH) risks. This study compares the effects of different strategies on uptake of cancer genetic services, specifically hereditary cancer risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing, and risk-based BC care.

DESIGN/METHODS

In Chicago, Illinois, Aim 1 participants are recruited from a federally qualified health center (FQHC) and community venues. For Aim 1, eligible participants: (1) are female; (2) are Latine; (3) are 30+ years old; (4) have personal or family history of BC or cancers with shared hereditary mutations; (5) have at least one SDOH risk; and (6) have not received any cancer genetic services. Participants are randomly assigned to different study arms. Both arms include phone-based sessions, FQHC-based navigation for SDOH, and low- or no-cost cancer genetic services. The educate sessions focus on risk assessment and prevention. The empower sessions focus on risk assessment and equip participants with the skills to share information about FQHC-based cancer genetic services. For Aim 2, eligible participants are: (1) female; (2) network members of Aim 1 participants; and (3) eligible for BC screening based on guidelines recommended by the American Cancer Society (ACS). Primary outcomes include uptake of any cancer genetic services. Analyses will also explore intervention differences by neighborhood context.

DISCUSSION

This is one of the first trials focused on Latines' participation in cancer genetic services and risk-based BC care within the context of SDOH - which has major implications for equity in precision cancer prevention.

A Proposed Framework and Lexicon for Cancer Prevention

SUMMARY

Cancer prevention is central to efforts to control the burden of cancer. We propose a new terminology framework to help guide these efforts and promote a key equity principle: "equal care for equal risk."

Communicating risk and the landscape of cancer prevention - an exploratory study that examines perceptions of cancer-related genetic counseling and testing among African Americans and Latinos in the Midwest

African American (AA) and Latino populations are impacted disproportionately by cancer incidence and mortality compared to the general US population. Contributing to these rates are multiple inheritable cancers that impact both men and women. Some of these diseases may be detected through genetic counseling and germline DNA testing; however, AA and Latinos are unaware and have limited knowledge and thus significantly underutilize these services and technologies. Research to detect influencing factors to testing uptake has also been slow due to multiple factors. The research team followed a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach and worked with a Community Advisory Board composed of cancer survivors and co-survivors to design the exploratory study. Six focus groups were held with a pilot sample of African Americans and Latinos who self-reported to be at-risk for cancer (N = 53). The study was held over a 2-month period where attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs about cancer risk and preference regarding cancer-related genetic counseling and testing risk communication were explored. Themes that emerged included (1) the lack of knowledge about cancer-related genetic counseling and testing; (2) cancer is feared often; (3) cancer-related genetic testing was perceived as something that could help but was also perceived as unnecessary testing that exposed individuals to medical harm; and (4) benefits to test were perceived as favorable for medical personnel but not for the patient. Implications of the study provide a unique lens to explore how lived experiences among AA and Latinos may inform strategic risk communication about cancer-related genetic counseling and testing and help advance cancer health equity. Participants viewed cancer genetic testing as important cancer risk prevention strategies. Identification of perceptions of cancer risk and cancer-related genetic counseling and testing in collaboration with members of the community is needed to bolster communication efforts among these populations.