Changes in anti-HLA antibody titers more than 1year after desensitization therapy with rituximab in living-donor kidney transplantation

Immune landscape of the kidney allograft in response to rejection

Preventing kidney graft dysfunction and rejection is a critical step in addressing the nationwide organ shortage and improving patient outcomes. While kidney transplants (KT) are performed more frequently, the overall number of patients on the waitlist consistently exceeds organ availability. Despite improved short-term outcomes in KT, comparable progress in long-term allograft survival has not been achieved. Major cause of graft loss at 5 years post-KT is chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) characterized by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Accordingly, proactive prevention of CAD requires a comprehensive understanding of the immune mechanisms associated with either further dysfunction or impaired repair. Allograft rejection is primed by innate immune cells and carried out by adaptive immune cells. The rejection process is primarily facilitated by antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). It is essential to better elucidate the actions of individual immune cell subclasses (e.g. B memory, Tregs, Macrophage type 1 and 2) throughout the rejection process, rather than limiting our understanding to broad classes of immune cells. Embracing multi-omic approaches may be the solution in acknowledging these intricacies and decoding these enigmatic pathways. A transition alongside advancing technology will better allow organ biology to find its place in this era of precision and personalized medicine.

Combined induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin and rituximab in highly sensitized renal recipients

Compared to non-sensitized renal transplant recipients, patients with preformed alloantibodies are at greater risk of cellular and humoral rejection and premature graft failure. We explored the effects of adding B-cell depleting agent (rituximab) to standard rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction regimen for patients with panel reactive antibody levels >50%. Following induction therapy, 14 recipients were given two doses of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) within the first month post-transplantation. Their long-term outcomes were compared to a historical control group of 23 recipients who received rATG alone. Graft survival at 5 years was superior with combination therapy compared to induction therapy alone (92.9 versus 48.3%, respectively, p = 0.02). While 30% of the rATG alone group experienced cellular rejection and 26% humoral rejection, none of rituximab plus rATG renal transplant recipients group had rejection. Thus, addition of rituximab to rATG provided superior outcomes to rATG alone. This combination induction therapy should be considered for a high-risk population.

High B-cell activating factor is not associated with worse 3-year graft outcome in blood group-incompatible kidney transplantation with rituximab induction

B cells and their regulation by B-cell activating factor BAFF are of growing interest in kidney transplantation (KTx). There is evidence that high serum (s) BAFF leads to increased allosensitization and impaired long-term graft function. We prospectively investigated sBAFF, peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), and donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in patients after ABOi with B-cell depleting rituximab induction treatment and compared them to a group of blood group-compatible (ABOc) living donor kidney recipients. Twelve patients after ABOi and 18 after ABOc were included. After rituximab treatment prior to ABOi, B cells remained significantly lower 1 year after KTx (1.2% (0.0-17.8) compared to ABOc of 8.6% (2.8-35.0), p = 0.0004, and also BAFF-R expression was significantly lower in ABOi (p < 0.006). sBAFF remained elevated 1 year post-Tx compared to ABOc (3615 ± 1800 vs. 1394 ± 493 pg/mL, p < 0.004). Kidney function was not significantly different between both groups after 1, 2, and 3 years. The use of rituximab in ABOi together with maintenance immunosuppression leads to significant elevation of sBAFF and lowering of B-cell numbers for more than 1 year, and this does not correlate with worse 3-year graft outcome.

Transplantation: rituximab induction for prevention of HLA-antibody rebound

Desensitization therapy enables HLA-incompatible transplantation. However, desensitized patients have an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection, and the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) is associated with poor outcomes. A new study has assessed the effect of rituximab induction on DSA production in kidney transplant recipients with high immunological risk.

A closer look at rituximab induction on HLA antibody rebound following HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation

Rituximab has been used to increase the efficacy of desensitization protocols for HLA incompatible kidney transplantation, however, controlled comparisons have not been reported. Here we examined 256 post-transplant HLA antibody levels in 25 recipients desensitized with or 25 without rituximab induction, to determine the impact of B cell depletion. We found significantly less HLA antibody rebound in the rituximab-treated patients (7% of donor specific antibodies (DSAs) and 33% of non-DSAs) compared to a control cohort desensitized and transplanted without rituximab (32% DSAs and 55% non-DSAs). The magnitude of the increase was significantly larger among patients who did not receive rituximab. Interestingly, in rituximab treated patients, of the 39 HLA antibodies that increased post-transplant, 34 were specific for HLA mismatches present in previous allografts or pregnancies, implying limited efficacy in memory B cell depletion. Compared to controls, rituximab-treated patients had a significantly greater mean reduction in DSA (−2505 versus −292 mean fluorescence intensity), but a similar rate of DSA persistence (52% in rituximab treated and 40% in non-treated recipients). Thus, rituximab induction in HLA incompatible recipients reduced the incidence and magnitude of HLA antibody rebound, but did not impact DSA elimination, antibody mediated rejection, or 5 year allograft survival when compared to recipients desensitized and transplanted without rituximab.

Polyomavirus BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients after desensitization with IVIG and rituximab

BACKGROUND

Desensitization with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and rituximab improves transplantation rates. It is unclear if desensitization increases the risk of polyomavirus BK (BKV) viremia. Here, BKV viremia in HLA-sensitized patients after desensitization with IVIG and rituximab was analyzed.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared in the desensitized group (N=187) and the non-desensitized group (N=284). Surveillance for BKV viremia was done at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttransplant. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

BKV viremia was observed in 20% of the desensitized and 10% of the non-desensitized (P<0.001) groups by 2 years posttransplant. The desensitized group had more lymphocyte depleting induction and more rejection. They also had a greater degree of viremia with more patients having a peak viral load greater than 10,000 copies per milliliter (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in BKV-associated nephropathy or graft loss in the two groups. There was an association of BKV viremia with desensitization and lymphocyte induction. Only desensitization remained a significant predictor in the multivariable model with an adjusted HR of 2.13 (95% CI 1.21-3.77, P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Desensitization with IVIG and rituximab is associated with a higher incidence of BKV viremia with high viral copies and was the major predictor of BKV viremia in the multivariable model. More frequent surveillance for BKV viremia and an early, aggressive treatment strategy are essential for preventing high BKV viral loads in this patient population.

Histopathologic features of transplant glomerulopathy associated with response to therapy with intravenous immune globulin and rituximab

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is associated with poor long-term allograft survival and is often accompanied by microcirculation inflammation. Histopathologic scoring may inform prognosis and help guide therapy. We retrospectively assessed 33 patients with biopsy-proven TG. All biopsies were given a glomerulitis (g) and peritubular capillaritis (ptc) score. We determined allograft survival and serum creatinine stability in three different score groups: g < 2 and ≥ 2, ptc < 2 and ≥ 2, and (g + ptc) < 4 and ≥ 4. We assessed the impact of treatment with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and rituximab on outcomes. Graft survival and serum creatinine stability did not differ in each of the histopathologic score groups. Higher-score groups were associated with the presence of concomitant antibody-mediated rejection and were more likely to receive IVIG and rituximab. Treatment with IVIG and rituximab resulted in stability of serum creatinine within the higher-score groups, but not in the lower-score groups. Stabilization of serum creatinine was associated with an improvement in donor-specific antibody. Histopathologic scoring in kidney allograft biopsies with TG may help guide treatment. The combination of IVIG and rituximab appears to be beneficial in patients whose biopsies have moderate or severe microvascular injury.

The paradoxical functions of B cells and antibodies in transplantation

Scarcely anyone would dispute that donor-specific B cells and the Abs that they produce can cause rejection of transplants. Less clear and more controversial, however, is the possibility that donor-specific B cells and the Abs that they produce are one or more means by which transplants can be protected from injury. In this article, we review and discuss this possibility and consider how less well-known functions of B cells and Abs might impact on the design of therapeutics and the management of transplant recipients.

Recent advances in immunosuppressive therapy for prevention of renal allograft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current immunosuppressive therapies are highly successful at regulating acute allograft rejection and inducing long-term transplanted kidney survival; however, currently available medications are associated with generalized immune suppression and drug toxicities, including nephrotoxicity. In recent years, advances in immunosuppression that target specific pathways involved in immune activation have been developed.

RECENT FINDINGS

In particular, promising medications are currently under evaluation that target ischemia-reperfusion injury as well as the cellular and humoral branches of the adaptive immune response. Targets of T-cell-mediated activation include antibodies and fusion proteins interfering with LFA-1/ICAM-1, CD2/LFA-3, CD40/CD154, and CD28/B7.1 and B7.2 interactions. Intracellular targets involved in T- and B-cell activation pathways are being evaluated, including protein kinase C inhibitors, Janus-associated kinase (JAK) inhibitors, and proteasome inhibitors. Several new medications demonstrate promise in inhibiting donor-directed humoral immunity by targeting B-cell-activating factor (BAFF) and complement activation pathways.

SUMMARY

The present review evaluates the recent clinical advances in immunosuppressive therapies for kidney transplantation. Publications regarding advances in immunosuppressive therapies over the past year were evaluated in the context of the specific immune pathways involved in allograft rejection.