A Decision Support System Based on Electre III for Safety Analysis in a Suburban Road Network

Systematic review, evaluation and comparison of different approaches for the implementation of road network safety analysis

Introduction

Road safety is still a major issue all around the world. The capability to analyze the road network and identify high risk sections is crucial in road safety management. Therefore, it is essential for road administrations, practitioners, and researcher to have a clear and practical framework of the available road network safety analysis procedures. The aim of this study is to provide such a framework by carrying out an exhaustive analysis of the main procedures available all around the world.

Method

The proposed literature review has started considering a web search on Web of Science (WoS). Then, a systematic review of each publication has been carried out using the Bibliometrix software, to identify the main characteristics of the publications within the specific topic. Then, the most relevant and widespread safety analysis procedures have been considered and the following aspects have been analyzed: the type of approach (crash analysis, crash prediction models procedures, based on road safety inspections, etc.), which and how many data are required (crashes, traffic, visual inspections, geometrical data, etc.), which is the effectiveness of the procedure, and which are the segmentation criteria used (fixed length, variable length based on geometry, traffic, etc.).

Results

Ten different procedures for road network safety analysis have been considered for detailed analysis. The research findings highlight that each procedure has its own pros and cons.

Conclusions

The choice of the best procedure to use is highly related to the characteristics of the road network that need to be analyzed, to the availability of data, and to the main elements the Road Authorities (RA) wants to give priority to.

Practical applications

This collection and review of different procedures will be of great interest for RAs, practitioners, and researchers in the process of selecting the most useful procedure to use to carry out a road network safety analysis.

A multidimensional and multi-period analysis of safety on roads

This paper proposes a multidimensional and multi-period analysis of safety on roads. It aggregates different road safety performance indicators observed over different periods for which multicriteria and multi-period approaches are used. The criticality of a road depends on the interaction of various factors, such as human factors, causes of accidents and their severity levels, and the characteristics/states of the roads. Therefore, there is a need for a multidimensional view of risk and its consequences concerning traffic accidents. Furthermore, using the Multiple Criteria Decision Making/Aid methods (MCDM/A) allows the performance of roads in the multiple criteria to be considered according to the decision maker's preferences. On the other hand, the temporal approach reflects the performance of roads and their accidents in different periods, enabling the information on the temporal behavior of accidents to be aggregated to the result. Given that Brazil has a vast road network, there is thus the problem of prioritizing road segments to allocate resources for traffic accident prevention and mitigation actions, especially as these resources are usually limited and scarce. For that, a case study is developed in the state of Pernambuco in Brazil. Eleven road segments are analyzed. The strategic objective of the decision-maker is to have a broader view, initially, of the criticality of these road segments in terms of safety so that strategically he can allocate resources to prevent and mitigate the risks of traffic accidents. For this, the decision-maker considered eleven criteria. These represent the different dimensions that can influence traffic accidents, such as the damage (impacts) to human beings or other consequences resulting from traffic accidents and issues related to the characteristics/state of the road and its traffic. Five periods of time were considered to incorporate the temporal influence of these dimensions (2015 to 2019). As a result, it is seen that, for a more comprehensive assessment, it is essential to consider a multidimensional view of risk and a multi-period evaluation, thus incorporating more information into the decision model and thereby making its results more assertive.

A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm

This paper intends to contribute with a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework to support risk evaluation for maintenance activities carried out on critical systems in industry. We propose to first select the best maintenance strategy tailored to companies' requirements and systems' features, and second to perform a risk prioritisation aimed at highlighting priorities of intervention. The Analytic Network Process (ANP) is suggested to select the maintenance policy representing the best trade-off considering the complex and varied interdependencies amongst a diversity of clustered elements characterising the system. Then, the main risks related to the interventions associated to the selected maintenance policy are ranked using the ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité III (ELECTRE III) method, using the same criteria weighted by the previous ANP application. This hybrid MCDM framework is applied to a core subsystem of a real-world marine salt manufacture firm.

An integrated group FWA-ELECTRE III approach based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets for solving the MCDM problems using limit distance mean

The material handling equipment (MHE) has a close connection with layout of machinery and plays the important role in productivity of servicing or manufacturing systems. Since each of MHE has distinct characteristics than the others with respect to conflicting criteria and design experts may state the different subjective judgments with respect to qualitative criteria, the material handling equipment selection problem (MHESP) can be taken into account as a group multi-criteria decision-making (GMCDM) problem. In this paper, a version of type-2 fuzzy sets (T2FSs), named Gaussian interval type-2 fuzzy sets (GIT2FSs), is first used as an alternative to the traditional triangular membership functions (MFs) to weight criteria and sub-criteria and also evaluate of alternatives with respect to sub-criteria. The synthetic value method of GIT2FSs is then carried out to convert the assessments stated as GIT2FSs for each alternative with respect to each sub-criterion and also weights of criteria (sub-criteria) into the single fuzzy rating and weight, respectively. Then, the fuzzy weighted average (FWA) approach is adopted to integrate the single fuzzy ratings of each alternative with respect to sub-criteria and the single fuzzy weights of sub-criteria under each criterion with the aggregated weighted ratings. In next stage, ELECTRE III (ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realite´—elimination and choice translation reality) is generalized with GIT2FSs to select the optimal MHE through a new ranking approach. Moreover, some arithmetic operations and properties are extended to GIT2FSs. In addition, to demonstrate its potential applications, the proposed methodology is implemented in a real case study and an illustrative example, and then, the ranking results are compared with those of the others in the literature. Finally, the sensitivity analysis is carried out to show robustness and stability of the obtained results.